Model comparison

GPT-5.6 Terra vs Muse Glimmer 30B

Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)

GPT-5.6 Terra (OpenAI) and Muse Glimmer 30B (Meta), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

openai logoGPT-5.6 Terrameta logoMuse Glimmer 30B
ProviderOpenAIMeta
Input (per 1M tokens)¥357.4¥62.55
Output (per 1M tokens)¥2,144.4¥268.05
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥1,430¥197
Context window1,050,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Release date7/9/20268/10/2026
Input modalitiesfile, image, texttext, image
Arena · overall#34 · ELO 1,468Unranked
Arena · JapaneseUnrankedUnranked
Arena · coding#22 · ELO 1,521Unranked

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, Muse Glimmer 30B: ¥268.05 per 1M output tokens, 88% less than GPT-5.6 Terra.
  • For long documents, GPT-5.6 Terra: a 1,050,000-token context window against 131,072 for Muse Glimmer 30B.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

GPT-5.6 Terra

“strawberry” is spelled: s t **r** a w b e **r** **r** y There are **3** occurrences of the letter **r**.
3.6s71 output tokens

Muse Glimmer 30B

The word is 10 letters long. Scanning left to right: 1. **s** - not r 2. **t** - not r 3. **r** - 1st r 4. **a** - not r 5. **w** - not r 6. **b** - not r 7. **e** - not r 8. **r** - 2nd r 9. **r** - 3rd r 10. **y** - not r `s t r a w b e r r y` There is one r in `str-`, and a double `rr` in `-berry`. Total = 1 + 2 = 3 r's.
8.0s614 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

GPT-5.6 Terra

The error means `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so React tries to evaluate: ```js users.map(...) ``` But `.map()` only exists on arrays. Common causes: - The parent component does not pass a `users` prop. - The user data is loaded asynchronously and has not arrived on the first render. - The API response shape differs from what you expect, e.g. data is in `response.data.users` rather than `response.data`. - The parent initializes its user state as `undefined` or `null`. ## Fix options ### 1. Initialize users as an empty array In the parent component: ```jsx const [users, setUsers] = useState([]); ``` Then pass it normally: ```jsx <UserList users={users} /> ``` An e…
5.8s559 output tokens

Muse Glimmer 30B

The error is exactly what it says: you're trying to call `.map` on `users`, but `users` is `undefined` at render time. ```js {users.map(user => ...)} ^^^^^^ ``` `Cannot read properties of undefined [reading 'map']` means `users` was never defined / passed in, so `users.map` throws. This happens very commonly with React components that receive async data. The parent renders `UserList` before the data has loaded, so the prop is `undefined` / `null` on the first render. ### Fix it by guarding the prop **1. Default parameter to an empty array - simplest** ```js function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul>…
5.6s888 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

GPT-5.6 Terra

Here are the main areas to improve: ### Issues in the original code - **Imports inside the function**: Move `requests` and `time` imports to module scope. - **Bare `except:`**: This catches everything, including `KeyboardInterrupt` and programming errors. Catch `requests.RequestException` (and possibly JSON decoding errors) instead. - **Status code check**: Prefer `response.raise_for_status()` or `response.ok` over manually checking only for `200`. Successful responses can include other 2xx status codes. - **`== True`**: Use `if item.get("active"):` instead. - **Potential `KeyError`**: `item["name"]`, `item["id"]`, and `item["active"]` can fail if the API response is incomplete. Use `.get(…
10.6s939 output tokens

Muse Glimmer 30B

The function works but it mixes concerns and hides errors. Here are the main issues: **Readability** * Imports inside the function. `import requests` and `import time` should be at module level. * Bare `except:` catches `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit` and masks bugs. * Unused loop variable `i` and vague names `r`, `data`. * No docstring / type hints, so the contract is unclear. * `if item["active"] == True:` is redundant and will raise `KeyError` if the key is missing. **Correctness / Best practices** * `except:` should be `except requests.RequestException`. JSON parsing can also fail. * Check `r.status_code == 200` is too narrow. Use `raise_for_status` / `r.ok` for any 2xx. * Fixed 2 se…
12.0s1795 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.6 Terra or Muse Glimmer 30B?
Per 1M output tokens, GPT-5.6 Terra is ¥2,144.4 and Muse Glimmer 30B is ¥268.05 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so Muse Glimmer 30B is cheaper.
How do the context windows of GPT-5.6 Terra and Muse Glimmer 30B compare?
GPT-5.6 Terra takes 1,050,000 tokens; Muse Glimmer 30B takes 131,072.
Can I use GPT-5.6 Terra and Muse Glimmer 30B with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "gpt-5.6-terra" or "muse-glimmer-30b" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call GPT-5.6 Terra and Muse Glimmer 30B from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with GPT-5.6 Terra

More comparisons with Muse Glimmer 30B