Model comparison

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)

GPT-5.6 Sol (OpenAI) and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (Qwen), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

openai logoGPT-5.6 Solqwen logoQwen3.8 2.4T A95B
ProviderOpenAIQwen
Input (per 1M tokens)¥893.5¥351.83
Output (per 1M tokens)¥5,361¥1,055.5
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥3,574¥880
Context window1,050,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Release date7/9/20268/12/2026
Input modalitiesfile, image, texttext
Arena · overall#17 · ELO 1,482Unranked
Arena · Japanese#1 · ELO 1,529Unranked
Arena · coding#15 · ELO 1,528Unranked

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: ¥1,055.5 per 1M output tokens, 80% less than GPT-5.6 Sol.
  • For long documents, GPT-5.6 Sol: a 1,050,000-token context window against 1,048,576 for Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

GPT-5.6 Sol

“strawberry” can be split into letters: s, t, **r**, a, w, b, e, **r**, **r**, y The letter **r** appears **3 times**.
3.0s78 output tokens

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

To count the number of **“r”**s in **“strawberry”**, spell it out letter by letter: **s t r a w b e r r y** Now check each letter: 1. s — not r 2. t — not r 3. r — yes, count 1 4. a — not r 5. w — not r 6. b — not r 7. e — not r 8. r — yes, count 2 9. r — yes, count 3 10. y — not r So there are **3** “r”s in **strawberry**.
1.3s203 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

GPT-5.6 Sol

The error occurs because `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so JavaScript cannot call `.map()` on it. This often happens when data is loaded asynchronously or the parent does not pass the prop. ### Fix options **1. Give `users` a default value:** ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => ( <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li> ))} </ul> ); } ``` Note that this handles `undefined`, but not an explicitly passed `null`. **2. Handle missing or invalid data explicitly:** ```jsx function UserList({ users }) { if (!Array.isArray(users)) { return <p>No users available.</p>; } return ( <ul> {users.m…
7.1s395 output tokens

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

The error happens because `users` is `undefined` when React tries to render this line: ```js {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} ``` JavaScript cannot call `.map()` on `undefined`. In your component: ```js function UserList({ users }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` React expects `users` to be an array, but something is rendering `<UserList />` without providing a valid `users` prop. --- ## Common causes ### 1. The parent component is not passing `users` For example: ```js <UserList /> ``` Instead of: ```js <UserList users={users} /> ``` --- ### 2. The data has not loaded yet If `users…
10.9s1318 output tokens

Professional Email

Write a professional email to a client explaining that the project delivery will be delayed by two weeks due to unexpected technical challenges discovered during integration testing. The tone should be apologetic but con…

GPT-5.6 Sol

**Subject: Project Delivery Update and Revised Timeline** Dear [Client Name], I’m writing to let you know that the delivery of [Project Name] will be delayed by two weeks, moving the target date from **[Original Delivery Date]** to **[Revised Delivery Date]**. During integration testing, our team identified unexpected technical challenges affecting [brief description of system/component, if appropriate]. Resolving these issues fully is essential to ensure the final solution meets the agreed performance, reliability, and quality standards. We sincerely apologize for the delay and any impact it may have on your plans. To minimize the delay and maintain delivery quality, we are taking the f…
6.9s395 output tokens

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Subject: Updated Project Timeline – Revised Delivery Date Dear [Client Name], I hope this message finds you well. I’m writing to provide an important update regarding the delivery timeline for [Project Name]. During our recent integration testing phase, we identified several unexpected technical challenges that require additional resolution to ensure the final deliverable meets the quality and performance standards we committed to. After carefully reviewing the scope of these items with our technical team, we have determined that the project delivery will need to be extended by two weeks. I sincerely apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. Please be assured that we are taking imm…
4.6s449 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.6 Sol or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
Per 1M output tokens, GPT-5.6 Sol is ¥5,361 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is ¥1,055.5 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is cheaper.
How do the context windows of GPT-5.6 Sol and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B compare?
GPT-5.6 Sol takes 1,050,000 tokens; Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B takes 1,048,576.
Can I use GPT-5.6 Sol and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "gpt-5.6-sol" or "qwen3.8-2.4t-a95b" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call GPT-5.6 Sol and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with GPT-5.6 Sol

More comparisons with Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B