Model comparison

Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol

Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)

Claude Opus 5 (Anthropic) and GPT-5.6 Sol (OpenAI), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

anthropic logoClaude Opus 5openai logoGPT-5.6 Sol
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input (per 1M tokens)¥893.5¥893.5
Output (per 1M tokens)¥4,467.5¥5,361
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥3,127¥3,574
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,050,000 tokens
Release date7/24/20267/9/2026
Input modalitiestext, image, filefile, image, text
Arena · overall#5 · ELO 1,495#13 · ELO 1,485
Arena · JapaneseUnrankedUnranked
Arena · coding#7 · ELO 1,535#16 · ELO 1,524

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, Claude Opus 5: ¥4,467.5 per 1M output tokens, 17% less than GPT-5.6 Sol.
  • On the Overall arena board, Claude Opus 5 ranks higher (#5; GPT-5.6 Sol is #13).
  • On the Coding arena board, Claude Opus 5 ranks higher (#7; GPT-5.6 Sol is #16).
  • For long documents, GPT-5.6 Sol: a 1,050,000-token context window against 1,000,000 for Claude Opus 5.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Claude Opus 5

## Counting the 'r's in "strawberry" **Step 1: Break the word into individual letters** | Position | Letter | |----------|--------| | 1 | s | | 2 | t | | 3 | **r** | | 4 | a | | 5 | w | | 6 | b | | 7 | e | | 8 | **r** | | 9 | **r** | | 10 | y | **Step 2: Identify each occurrence of 'r'** - Position 3: the 'r' in the "str-" beginning - Position 8: the first 'r' in the "-rry" ending - Position 9: the second 'r' in the "-rry" ending **Step 3: Tally them up** 3 + 8 + 9 → that's **3 occurrences**. ## Answer: 3 The tricky part is that "strawberry" contains a *double* 'r' near the end ("berry"), which is easy to skim over as a single letter. Splitting the word into "straw" (1 'r') + "berry"…
7.1s466 output tokens

GPT-5.6 Sol

“strawberry” can be split into letters: s, t, **r**, a, w, b, e, **r**, **r**, y The letter **r** appears **3 times**.
3.0s78 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Claude Opus 5

## What's happening The error means `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders — so calling `.map()` on it throws. React isn't the problem; the prop simply isn't there yet (or ever). The three most common causes: 1. **The parent isn't passing the prop** (or passes it under a different name / typo): ```jsx <UserList /> // users is undefined <UserList user={data} /> // wrong name ``` 2. **The data is fetched asynchronously**, and the first render happens before it arrives: ```jsx const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // undefined on first render! useEffect(() => { fetch('/api/users').then(r => r.json()).then(setUsers); }, []); return <UserList user…
15.1s1191 output tokens

GPT-5.6 Sol

The error occurs because `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so JavaScript cannot call `.map()` on it. This often happens when data is loaded asynchronously or the parent does not pass the prop. ### Fix options **1. Give `users` a default value:** ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => ( <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li> ))} </ul> ); } ``` Note that this handles `undefined`, but not an explicitly passed `null`. **2. Handle missing or invalid data explicitly:** ```jsx function UserList({ users }) { if (!Array.isArray(users)) { return <p>No users available.</p>; } return ( <ul> {users.m…
7.1s395 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Claude Opus 5

# Code Review: `get_data` Overall, the function works for the happy path, but there are several issues worth addressing — the most serious being the bare `except`, the silent failure mode, and the conflation of two responsibilities (fetching and transforming). ## Critical Issues ### 1. Bare `except` swallows everything ```python except: time.sleep(2) ``` This catches `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, `MemoryError`, and — importantly — bugs in your own code. If `item["active"]` raises a `KeyError` because the API changed its schema, you'll retry three times and return `[]`, giving you no indication anything went wrong. Catch `requests.RequestException` instead (the base class for all…
34.7s2823 output tokens

GPT-5.6 Sol

### Issues and suggested improvements - Move imports to module scope. - Avoid bare `except:`; it catches programming errors and interrupts such as `KeyboardInterrupt`. - Use `response.raise_for_status()` instead of manually checking only for `200`; other 2xx responses may also be valid. - Retry only transient failures, such as timeouts, connection errors, `429`, and selected `5xx` responses. Retrying most `4xx` errors is not useful. - Use exponential backoff rather than a fixed delay. - Avoid sleeping after the final failed attempt. - Replace `item["active"] == True` with `item.get("active") is True`. - Use a list comprehension for the transformation. - Add type hints and validate arguments…
33.1s1646 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5 or GPT-5.6 Sol?
Per 1M output tokens, Claude Opus 5 is ¥4,467.5 and GPT-5.6 Sol is ¥5,361 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so Claude Opus 5 is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Claude Opus 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol compare?
Claude Opus 5 takes 1,000,000 tokens; GPT-5.6 Sol takes 1,050,000.
Which ranks higher, Claude Opus 5 or GPT-5.6 Sol?
Claude Opus 5 ranks higher on the public arena (Claude Opus 5 #5, GPT-5.6 Sol #13). Ranks move as the leaderboard updates.
Can I use Claude Opus 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "anthropic-claude-opus-5" or "gpt-5.6-sol" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Claude Opus 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Claude Opus 5

More comparisons with GPT-5.6 Sol