Model comparison

GPT-5.6 Sol vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

GPT-5.6 Sol (OpenAI) and MiMo-V2.6-Flash (Xiaomi), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

openai logoGPT-5.6 SolMiMo-V2.6-Flash
ProviderOpenAIXiaomi
Input (per 1M tokens)¥357.4¥25.02
Output (per 1M tokens)¥1,787¥50.04
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥1,251¥50
Context window1,050,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Release date7/9/20269/21/2026
Input modalitiesfile, image, texttext, image, video, audio
Throughput (p50)
Arena · overall#18 · ELO 1,483Unranked
Arena · Japanese#5 · ELO 1,503Unranked
Arena · coding#17 · ELO 1,528Unranked

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: ¥50.04 per 1M output tokens, 97% less than GPT-5.6 Sol.
  • For long documents, GPT-5.6 Sol: a 1,050,000-token context window against 1,048,576 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

GPT-5.6 Sol

“strawberry” can be split into letters: s, t, **r**, a, w, b, e, **r**, **r**, y The letter **r** appears **3 times**.
3.0s78 output tokens

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

## Counting the 'r's in 'strawberry' **Step 1: Write out each letter of the word individually:** `s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y` **Step 2: Go through each letter one by one and check if it's an 'r':** | Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? | Running Count | |----------|--------|------------|---------------| | 1 | s | ❌ | 0 | | 2 | t | ❌ | 0 | | 3 | **r** | ✅ | **1** | | 4 | a | ❌ | 1 | | 5 | w | ❌ | 1 | | 6 | b | ❌ | 1 | | 7 | e | ❌ | 1 | | 8 | **r** | ✅ | **2** | | 9 | **r** | ✅ | **3** | | 10 | y | ❌ | 3 | **Answer: There are 3 'r's in 'strawberry'.** 🍓 The first 'r' appears at position 3 (after "st"), and the remaining two are the double 'rr' near the end of the word.
6.5s379 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

GPT-5.6 Sol

The error occurs because `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so JavaScript cannot call `.map()` on it. This often happens when data is loaded asynchronously or the parent does not pass the prop. ### Fix options **1. Give `users` a default value:** ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => ( <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li> ))} </ul> ); } ``` Note that this handles `undefined`, but not an explicitly passed `null`. **2. Handle missing or invalid data explicitly:** ```jsx function UserList({ users }) { if (!Array.isArray(users)) { return <p>No users available.</p>; } return ( <ul> {users.m…
7.1s395 output tokens

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

## Cause of the Error The error occurs because the `users` prop is `undefined` when the component first renders. When you try to call `.map()` on `undefined`, it throws: ``` TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') ``` This typically happens when: 1. The **parent component** hasn't passed `users` yet (e.g., data is still loading from an API) 2. The prop name **doesn't match** between parent and child 3. The prop is **intentionally optional** but used unconditionally ## Fixes ### 1. Default parameter value (simplest fix) Set a default value for `users` so it's always an array: ```js function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user =>…
7.6s547 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

GPT-5.6 Sol

### Issues and suggested improvements - Move imports to module scope. - Avoid bare `except:`; it catches programming errors and interrupts such as `KeyboardInterrupt`. - Use `response.raise_for_status()` instead of manually checking only for `200`; other 2xx responses may also be valid. - Retry only transient failures, such as timeouts, connection errors, `429`, and selected `5xx` responses. Retrying most `4xx` errors is not useful. - Use exponential backoff rather than a fixed delay. - Avoid sleeping after the final failed attempt. - Replace `item["active"] == True` with `item.get("active") is True`. - Use a list comprehension for the transformation. - Add type hints and validate arguments…
33.1s1646 output tokens

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

# Code Review: `get_data` ## Issues Identified | Category | Issue | |----------|-------| | **Readability** | Imports inside function, vague names (`i`, `r`), no docstring/type hints | | **Performance** | Manual loop instead of list comprehension, no `requests.Session` (no connection reuse) | | **Best Practices** | Bare `except`, `== True`, silent failures, no backoff, no error propagation | --- ## Improved Version ```python import time import logging import requests from typing import Optional logger = logging.getLogger(__name__) def get_data( url: str, retries: int = 3, timeout: float = 10, backoff_factor: float = 2.0, ) -> Optional[list[dict]]: """ Fetch dat…
18.9s1208 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.6 Sol or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
Per 1M output tokens, GPT-5.6 Sol is ¥1,787 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is ¥50.04 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper.
How do the context windows of GPT-5.6 Sol and MiMo-V2.6-Flash compare?
GPT-5.6 Sol takes 1,050,000 tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Flash takes 1,048,576.
Can I use GPT-5.6 Sol and MiMo-V2.6-Flash with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "gpt-5.6-sol" or "mimo-v2.6-flash" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call GPT-5.6 Sol and MiMo-V2.6-Flash from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with GPT-5.6 Sol

More comparisons with MiMo-V2.6-Flash