Model comparison

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Inkling

Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)

GPT-5.6 Luna (OpenAI) and Inkling (Thinkingmachines), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

openai logoGPT-5.6 LunaInkling
ProviderOpenAIThinkingmachines
Input (per 1M tokens)¥35.74¥178.7
Output (per 1M tokens)¥214.44¥723.74
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥143¥541
Context window1,050,000 tokens524,288 tokens
Release date7/9/20267/17/2026
Input modalitiesfile, image, texttext, image, audio
Arena · overall#63 · ELO 1,452#81 · ELO 1,439
Arena · Japanese#36 · ELO 1,444#52 · ELO 1,425
Arena · coding#69 · ELO 1,496#80 · ELO 1,489

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, GPT-5.6 Luna: ¥214.44 per 1M output tokens, 70% less than Inkling.
  • On the Overall arena board, GPT-5.6 Luna ranks higher (#63; Inkling is #81).
  • On the Japanese arena board, GPT-5.6 Luna ranks higher (#36; Inkling is #52).
  • On the Coding arena board, GPT-5.6 Luna ranks higher (#69; Inkling is #80).
  • For long documents, GPT-5.6 Luna: a 1,050,000-token context window against 524,288 for Inkling.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

GPT-5.6 Luna

The word **“strawberry”** is spelled: **s – t – r – a – w – b – e – r – r – y** The letter **“r”** appears at positions **3, 8, and 9**. **Answer: 3**
3.0s120 output tokens

Inkling

Let's break down the word **"strawberry"** letter by letter: 1. **s** 2. **t** 3. **r** ← (1st 'r') 4. **a** 5. **w** 6. **b** 7. **e** 8. **r** ← (2nd 'r') 9. **r** ← (3rd 'r') 10. **y** So the spelling is: s-t-**r**-a-w-b-e-**r**-**r**-y Counting them up: - One 'r' in "str" (the 3rd letter) - Two 'r's in "berry" (the 8th and 9th letters) **Total: 3 'r's** in "strawberry".**
2.4s417 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

GPT-5.6 Luna

`users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so calling `.map()` on it fails. `.map()` only exists on arrays. Common causes include: - The parent does not pass a `users` prop. - The prop name differs, such as `userList` instead of `users`. - Users are loaded asynchronously and are initially undefined. - The API response has a different shape, such as `{ data: [...] }`. ### Provide a default value ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => ( <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li> ))} </ul> ); } ``` The parent should pass an array: ```jsx <UserList users={users} /> ``` If the list comes from state, initialize it as an empty…
4.8s507 output tokens

Inkling

The error occurs because `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so `users.map` fails. This usually happens when: - The parent doesn't pass the prop (`<UserList />` instead of `<UserList users={...} />`) - Data is still loading (e.g., API hasn't returned yet) ## Quick Fix Provide a default empty array so `.map` always has an array to work with: ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` Alternatively, guard against undefined explicitly: ```jsx function UserList({ users }) { if (!users) return null; // or a loading state return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={…
4.9s585 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

GPT-5.6 Luna

### Main issues - Imports should be at module level, not inside the function. - A bare `except:` catches everything, including programming errors and `KeyboardInterrupt`. - The function sleeps even after the final failed attempt. - It retries all HTTP statuses, including permanent errors such as `404`. - `status_code == 200` excludes other successful `2xx` responses. - `if item["active"] == True` should generally be `if item.get("active") is True`. - A `requests.Session` can reuse connections and improve performance. - Returning `[]` for every failure makes it impossible to distinguish “no active items” from “request failed.” - Retries should generally use backoff rather than a fixed delay.…
23.3s1978 output tokens

Inkling

Here is a review with an improved version followed by explanations. ### Issues in the original - **Imports inside the function**: Re-importing on every call is inefficient. - **Bare `except:`**: Catches `SystemExit`, `KeyboardInterrupt`, etc. - **Silent failures**: No logging; errors disappear. - **Magic numbers**: `10`, `2`, `200` are hard-coded. - **Data validation missing**: Assumes `data` is a list and every item has `"active"`, `"name"`, and `"id"` (will crash with `KeyError`). - **Performance**: Uses `.append()` in a loop instead of a list comprehension. - **Ambiguous return**: `[]` means both "success with no results" and "total failure". ### Improved version ```python import loggi…
54.1s5649 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.6 Luna or Inkling?
Per 1M output tokens, GPT-5.6 Luna is ¥214.44 and Inkling is ¥723.74 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper.
How do the context windows of GPT-5.6 Luna and Inkling compare?
GPT-5.6 Luna takes 1,050,000 tokens; Inkling takes 524,288.
Which ranks higher, GPT-5.6 Luna or Inkling?
GPT-5.6 Luna ranks higher on the public arena (GPT-5.6 Luna #36, Inkling #52). Ranks move as the leaderboard updates.
Can I use GPT-5.6 Luna and Inkling with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "gpt-5.6-luna" or "inkling" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call GPT-5.6 Luna and Inkling from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with GPT-5.6 Luna

More comparisons with Inkling