Model comparison

GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Grok 4.6

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

GLM 5.3 FlashX (Z.ai) and Grok 4.6 (xAI), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

z-ai logoGLM 5.3 FlashXx-ai logoGrok 4.6
ProviderZ.aixAI
Input (per 1M tokens)¥66.12¥357.4
Output (per 1M tokens)¥223.38¥1,072.2
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥178¥894
Context window1,048,576 tokens500,000 tokens
Release date9/18/20268/12/2026
Input modalitiestext, image, videotext, image, file
Throughput (p50)
Arena · overallUnranked#63 · ELO 1,456
Arena · JapaneseUnranked#68 · ELO 1,412
Arena · codingUnranked#54 · ELO 1,506

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, GLM 5.3 FlashX: ¥223.38 per 1M output tokens, 79% less than Grok 4.6.
  • For long documents, GLM 5.3 FlashX: a 1,048,576-token context window against 500,000 for Grok 4.6.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

GLM 5.3 FlashX

# Counting 'r's in "strawberry" **Step 1: Write out each letter with its position** | Position | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |----------|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|----| | Letter | s | t | r | a | w | b | e | r | r | y | **Step 2: Check each letter one by one** - Position 1: **s** → not an 'r' - Position 2: **t** → not an 'r' - Position 3: **r** → ✅ 'r' found (count: 1) - Position 4: **a** → not an 'r' - Position 5: **w** → not an 'r' - Position 6: **b** → not an 'r' - Position 7: **e** → not an 'r' - Position 8: **r** → ✅ 'r' found (count: 2) - Position 9: **r** → ✅ 'r' found (count: 3) - Position 10: **y** → not an 'r' **Step 3: Tally the results** The 'r's a…
4.1s549 output tokens

Grok 4.6

The word "strawberry" consists of the following letters in order: s-t-r-a-w-b-e-r-r-y Checking each one: - s: not r - t: not r - r: yes (count = 1) - a: not r - w: not r - b: not r - e: not r - r: yes (count = 2) - r: yes (count = 3) - y: not r There are exactly 3 r's. Final answer: 3
3.9s451 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

GLM 5.3 FlashX

## What's Happening The error means `users` is `undefined` at the time `UserList` renders. You're calling `.map()` on `undefined`, which JavaScript doesn't allow. This almost always happens for one of these reasons: 1. **The parent isn't passing the prop** — `<UserList />` with no `users` prop 2. **Data hasn't loaded yet** — you're fetching asynchronously, so the first render happens before the data arrives 3. **Prop name mismatch** — e.g., passing `user` but reading `users` 4. **Parent state initialized to `undefined`** — e.g., `useState()` instead of `useState([])` ## Fixes ### Option 1: Default parameter (simplest) ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul>…
6.8s934 output tokens

Grok 4.6

**The error happens because `users` is `undefined` when `.map()` is called.** `UserList` destructures `{ users }` from its props. If the parent doesn't pass a `users` prop (or passes `undefined`/`null`), `users` is `undefined` and `undefined.map` throws. This is extremely common when: - Data is loaded asynchronously (initial render happens before the fetch finishes). - The parent component forgets to pass the prop or uses a different name. - The component is rendered before the data is ready (e.g. in a loading state). ### Quick fixes **1. Default to an empty array (recommended)** ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => ( <li key={us…
20.3s598 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

GLM 5.3 FlashX

# Code Review The function works, but there are several issues worth addressing — including one subtle bug caused by the bare `except`. ## Correctness issues (most important) 1. **Bare `except:` is dangerous and masks a bug.** It catches *everything*, including `KeyboardInterrupt` and `SystemExit` (so Ctrl+C during a retry sleep is swallowed). Worse: because your data-processing loop sits inside the `try`, a `KeyError` from a malformed item is treated as a network failure — triggering a pointless re-download of the URL and silently discarding the real error. Catch only `requests.RequestException` (and `ValueError` for JSON decode failures). 2. **Silent failure.** Returning `[]` on error…
36.9s5836 output tokens

Grok 4.6

Here is a focused review of the function, followed by a cleaned-up version. ## Issues **Imports inside the function** `requests` and `time` should live at module level. Importing on every call is slower, hides dependencies, and is harder to mock in tests. **Bare `except:`** This swallows `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, and programming errors. Catch `requests.RequestException` (network/timeout/HTTP adapter errors) and JSON/`KeyError`/`TypeError` separately. **Retrying the wrong things** A 404 or 400 will never succeed on retry. Retry transient failures (timeouts, connection errors, 429, 5xx). Fail fast on most 4xx responses. **Sleep after the last attempt** On the final failur…
27.9s1770 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 FlashX or Grok 4.6?
Per 1M output tokens, GLM 5.3 FlashX is ¥223.38 and Grok 4.6 is ¥1,072.2 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so GLM 5.3 FlashX is cheaper.
How do the context windows of GLM 5.3 FlashX and Grok 4.6 compare?
GLM 5.3 FlashX takes 1,048,576 tokens; Grok 4.6 takes 500,000.
Can I use GLM 5.3 FlashX and Grok 4.6 with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "glm-5.3-flashx" or "grok-4.6" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call GLM 5.3 FlashX and Grok 4.6 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with GLM 5.3 FlashX

More comparisons with Grok 4.6