Model comparison

GLM 5.3 Flash vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)

GLM 5.3 Flash (Z.ai) and MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Xiaomi), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

z-ai logoGLM 5.3 FlashMiMo-V2.5-Pro
ProviderZ.aiXiaomi
Input (per 1M tokens)¥13.19¥77.73
Output (per 1M tokens)¥43.98¥155.47
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥35¥155
Context window1,310,720 tokens1,050,000 tokens
Release date8/26/20264/22/2026
Input modalitiestext, image, videotext
Arena · overall#38 · ELO 1,469#40 · ELO 1,468
Arena · JapaneseUnranked#61 · ELO 1,418
Arena · coding#11 · ELO 1,531#27 · ELO 1,520

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, GLM 5.3 Flash: ¥43.98 per 1M output tokens, 72% less than MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
  • On the Overall arena board, GLM 5.3 Flash ranks higher (#38; MiMo-V2.5-Pro is #40).
  • On the Coding arena board, GLM 5.3 Flash ranks higher (#11; MiMo-V2.5-Pro is #27).
  • For long documents, GLM 5.3 Flash: a 1,310,720-token context window against 1,050,000 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

GLM 5.3 Flash

# Counting 'r's in 'strawberry' **Step 1: Write out the word letter by letter** s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y **Step 2: Check each letter one at a time** | Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? | |----------|--------|-----------| | 1 | s | No | | 2 | t | No | | 3 | r | **Yes! (1)** | | 4 | a | No | | 5 | w | No | | 6 | b | No | | 7 | e | No | | 8 | r | **Yes! (2)** | | 9 | r | **Yes! (3)** | | 10 | y | No | **Step 3: Add up the matches** The 'r's appear at positions 3, 8, and 9. ## Answer: There are **3** 'r's in "strawberry" 🍓
7.2s449 output tokens

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

## Counting the r's in "strawberry" Let me go through each letter one by one: | Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? | |----------|--------|------------| | 1 | s | No | | 2 | t | No | | 3 | **r** | ✅ Yes (#1) | | 4 | a | No | | 5 | w | No | | 6 | b | No | | 7 | e | No | | 8 | **r** | ✅ Yes (#2) | | 9 | **r** | ✅ Yes (#3) | | 10 | y | No | **There are 3 r's in "strawberry."** The word breaks down as **straw·ber·ry**, and the r's appear at the end of "staw" and then twice in the double-r of "rry."
8.3s313 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

GLM 5.3 Flash

## What's happening The error means the `users` prop is `undefined` at the time `UserList` renders. Since you can't call `.map()` on `undefined`, JavaScript throws the TypeError. This usually happens for one of these reasons: 1. **The parent isn't passing the prop** — rendering `<UserList />` without `users`, or with a typo'd prop name like `user={users}`. 2. **Data hasn't loaded yet** — the parent fetches data asynchronously and its state starts as `undefined`: ```jsx const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // undefined until fetch resolves! return <UserList users={users} />; ``` 3. **API response shape mismatch** — the array is nested, e.g., you need `response.data.users` inst…
31.3s1639 output tokens

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

# Fixing `Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')` ## The Problem The error means `users` is `undefined` when the component first renders. This typically happens when: 1. **The parent component hasn't passed the `users` prop** 2. **The data is being fetched asynchronously and isn't available yet** 3. **The prop name is misspelled in the parent** For example, the parent might be rendering it like this: ```jsx // ❌ No users prop passed — `users` will be undefined <UserList /> ``` ## Solutions ### 1. Add a Default Prop Value (Simple Fix) ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); }…
14.4s680 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

GLM 5.3 Flash

Solid foundation — you're already passing an explicit `timeout` and implementing retries, which many people skip. Here's a breakdown by category: ## Correctness & robustness (most important) - **Bare `except:`** catches *everything*, including `KeyboardInterrupt` and `SystemExit`, and silently discards the error. Catch specific exceptions: `requests.RequestException` for network issues, `ValueError` for invalid JSON. - **Retrying non-retryable failures**: a 401/403/404 will never succeed on retry, so you're sleeping 6 seconds for nothing. Only retry transient errors (5xx, 429, timeouts/connection errors). - **`item["active"]` raises `KeyError`** on malformed data. Use `item.get("active")`…
116.1s6185 output tokens

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

# Code Review: `get_data` Function ## Issues Identified ``` ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ ISSUE SEVERITY MAP │ ├──────────────────┬────────────┬──────────────────────────────┤ │ Issue │ Severity │ Category │ ├──────────────────┼────────────┼──────────────────────────────┤ │ Bare except │ 🔴 High │ Error Handling / Best Prac. │ │ Silent failures │ 🔴 High │ Debuggability │ │ == True check │ 🟡 Medium │ Readability / PEP 8 │ │ Inline imports │ 🟡 Medium │ Best Practice │ │ No type hints │ 🟡 Medium │ Best Practice…
10.4s1572 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
Per 1M output tokens, GLM 5.3 Flash is ¥43.98 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro is ¥155.47 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so GLM 5.3 Flash is cheaper.
How do the context windows of GLM 5.3 Flash and MiMo-V2.5-Pro compare?
GLM 5.3 Flash takes 1,310,720 tokens; MiMo-V2.5-Pro takes 1,050,000.
Which ranks higher, GLM 5.3 Flash or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
GLM 5.3 Flash ranks higher on the public arena (GLM 5.3 Flash #38, MiMo-V2.5-Pro #61). Ranks move as the leaderboard updates.
Can I use GLM 5.3 Flash and MiMo-V2.5-Pro with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "glm-5.3-flash" or "mimo-v2.5-pro" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call GLM 5.3 Flash and MiMo-V2.5-Pro from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with GLM 5.3 Flash

More comparisons with MiMo-V2.5-Pro