Model comparison

GLM 4.7 vs gpt-oss-120b

Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)

GLM 4.7 (Z.ai) and gpt-oss-120b (OpenAI), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

z-ai logoGLM 4.7openai logogpt-oss-120b
ProviderZ.aiOpenAI
Input (per 1M tokens)¥107.22¥16
Output (per 1M tokens)¥393.14¥79
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥304¥56
Context window202,752 tokens131,072 tokens
Release date12/22/20258/5/2025
Input modalitiestexttext
Arena · overall#79 · ELO 1,442#196 · ELO 1,352
Arena · JapaneseUnranked#133 · ELO 1,328
Arena · coding#87 · ELO 1,485#203 · ELO 1,391

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, gpt-oss-120b: ¥79 per 1M output tokens, 80% less than GLM 4.7.
  • On the Overall arena board, GLM 4.7 ranks higher (#79; gpt-oss-120b is #196).
  • On the Coding arena board, GLM 4.7 ranks higher (#87; gpt-oss-120b is #203).
  • For long documents, GLM 4.7: a 202,752-token context window against 131,072 for gpt-oss-120b.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

GLM 4.7

There are **3** "r"s in "strawberry". Here is the step-by-step reasoning: 1. **Break down the word into individual letters:** s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y 2. **Identify the position of each 'r':** * The 3rd letter is **r**. * The 8th letter is **r**. * The 9th letter is **r**. 3. **Count the total occurrences:** 1 + 1 + 1 = 3.
23.3s685 output tokens

gpt-oss-120b

**Step‑by‑step count of the letter “r” in the word “strawberry”** 1. Write out the word with each letter in order, labeling its position: | Position | Letter | |----------|--------| | 1 | s | | 2 | t | | 3 | **r** | | 4 | a | | 5 | w | | 6 | b | | 7 | e | | 8 | **r** | | 9 | **r** | |10 | y | 2. Scan the list and mark every occurrence of the letter **r**. - Position 3 → r (first occurrence) - Position 8 → r (second occurrence) - Position 9 → r (third occurrence) 3. Count the marked entries: there are **3** marked positions. **Result:** The word “strawberry” contains **3** occurrences of the letter **r**…
1.7s332 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

GLM 4.7

### The Cause The error `TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')` means that the variable `users` is `undefined` when the component tries to render. In React, this typically happens for one of two reasons: 1. The **Parent Component** is not passing the `users` prop to `UserList`. 2. The **Parent Component** passed the prop, but the data hasn't loaded yet (e.g., an API call is still pending), so the value is initially `undefined`. Since `undefined` does not have a `.map()` method, the application crashes. --- ### How to Fix It There are two main ways to fix this: handling it inside the `UserList` component (defensive coding) or fixing the parent component passing…
42.0s1384 output tokens

gpt-oss-120b

### Why the `map` can’t be called `Array.prototype.map` is a method that exists only on **arrays** (or array‑like objects). When you see ``` TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (...) ``` it means that the variable you think is an array – `users` in this case – is actually **`undefined`** (or `null`). React is trying to evaluate this line: ```jsx {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} ``` and it crashes because you can’t read `.map` from `undefined`. --- ## Common reasons `users` ends up undefined | Reason | Typical scenario | How it shows up | |--------|------------------|-----------------| | **Prop not passed** | `<Use…
7.3s1610 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

GLM 4.7

Here is a review of your function with suggestions for improving readability, performance, and best practices, followed by a refactored version of the code. ### Code Review 1. **Import Placement:** You import `requests` and `time` inside the function. Imports should generally be placed at the top of the file so they are loaded once when the module starts, rather than every time the function is called. 2. **Bare `except:`:** You used `except:` without specifying an exception type. This is dangerous because it catches *everything*, including `KeyboardInterrupt` (Ctrl+C) and `SystemExit`, preventing your program from terminating when needed. You should specifically catch `requests.exception…
24.5s2951 output tokens

gpt-oss-120b

Below is a **step‑by‑step review** of the original `get_data` implementation followed by a **refactored version** that addresses readability, performance, and modern Python best‑practice concerns. --- ## 1. What the original function does ```python def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries): try: r = requests.get(url, timeout=10) if r.status_code == 200: data = r.json() result = [] for item in data: if item["active"] == True: result.append({"name": item["name"], "id": item["id"]}) return result…
14.4s3132 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GLM 4.7 or gpt-oss-120b?
Per 1M output tokens, GLM 4.7 is ¥393.14 and gpt-oss-120b is ¥79 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so gpt-oss-120b is cheaper.
How do the context windows of GLM 4.7 and gpt-oss-120b compare?
GLM 4.7 takes 202,752 tokens; gpt-oss-120b takes 131,072.
Which ranks higher, GLM 4.7 or gpt-oss-120b?
GLM 4.7 ranks higher on the public arena (GLM 4.7 #79, gpt-oss-120b #133). Ranks move as the leaderboard updates.
Can I use GLM 4.7 and gpt-oss-120b with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "glm-4.7" or "gpt-oss-120b" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call GLM 4.7 and gpt-oss-120b from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with GLM 4.7

More comparisons with gpt-oss-120b