Model comparison

GLM 4.7 vs GPT-5.6 Sol

Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)

GLM 4.7 (Z.ai) and GPT-5.6 Sol (OpenAI), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

z-ai logoGLM 4.7openai logoGPT-5.6 Sol
ProviderZ.aiOpenAI
Input (per 1M tokens)¥107.22¥893.5
Output (per 1M tokens)¥393.14¥5,361
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥304¥3,574
Context window202,752 tokens1,050,000 tokens
Release date12/22/20257/9/2026
Input modalitiestextfile, image, text
Arena · overall#79 · ELO 1,442#17 · ELO 1,482
Arena · JapaneseUnranked#1 · ELO 1,529
Arena · coding#87 · ELO 1,485#15 · ELO 1,528

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, GLM 4.7: ¥393.14 per 1M output tokens, 93% less than GPT-5.6 Sol.
  • On the Overall arena board, GPT-5.6 Sol ranks higher (#17; GLM 4.7 is #79).
  • On the Coding arena board, GPT-5.6 Sol ranks higher (#15; GLM 4.7 is #87).
  • For long documents, GPT-5.6 Sol: a 1,050,000-token context window against 202,752 for GLM 4.7.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

GLM 4.7

There are **3** "r"s in "strawberry". Here is the step-by-step reasoning: 1. **Break down the word into individual letters:** s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y 2. **Identify the position of each 'r':** * The 3rd letter is **r**. * The 8th letter is **r**. * The 9th letter is **r**. 3. **Count the total occurrences:** 1 + 1 + 1 = 3.
23.3s685 output tokens

GPT-5.6 Sol

“strawberry” can be split into letters: s, t, **r**, a, w, b, e, **r**, **r**, y The letter **r** appears **3 times**.
3.0s78 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

GLM 4.7

### The Cause The error `TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')` means that the variable `users` is `undefined` when the component tries to render. In React, this typically happens for one of two reasons: 1. The **Parent Component** is not passing the `users` prop to `UserList`. 2. The **Parent Component** passed the prop, but the data hasn't loaded yet (e.g., an API call is still pending), so the value is initially `undefined`. Since `undefined` does not have a `.map()` method, the application crashes. --- ### How to Fix It There are two main ways to fix this: handling it inside the `UserList` component (defensive coding) or fixing the parent component passing…
42.0s1384 output tokens

GPT-5.6 Sol

The error occurs because `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so JavaScript cannot call `.map()` on it. This often happens when data is loaded asynchronously or the parent does not pass the prop. ### Fix options **1. Give `users` a default value:** ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => ( <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li> ))} </ul> ); } ``` Note that this handles `undefined`, but not an explicitly passed `null`. **2. Handle missing or invalid data explicitly:** ```jsx function UserList({ users }) { if (!Array.isArray(users)) { return <p>No users available.</p>; } return ( <ul> {users.m…
7.1s395 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

GLM 4.7

Here is a review of your function with suggestions for improving readability, performance, and best practices, followed by a refactored version of the code. ### Code Review 1. **Import Placement:** You import `requests` and `time` inside the function. Imports should generally be placed at the top of the file so they are loaded once when the module starts, rather than every time the function is called. 2. **Bare `except:`:** You used `except:` without specifying an exception type. This is dangerous because it catches *everything*, including `KeyboardInterrupt` (Ctrl+C) and `SystemExit`, preventing your program from terminating when needed. You should specifically catch `requests.exception…
24.5s2951 output tokens

GPT-5.6 Sol

### Issues and suggested improvements - Move imports to module scope. - Avoid bare `except:`; it catches programming errors and interrupts such as `KeyboardInterrupt`. - Use `response.raise_for_status()` instead of manually checking only for `200`; other 2xx responses may also be valid. - Retry only transient failures, such as timeouts, connection errors, `429`, and selected `5xx` responses. Retrying most `4xx` errors is not useful. - Use exponential backoff rather than a fixed delay. - Avoid sleeping after the final failed attempt. - Replace `item["active"] == True` with `item.get("active") is True`. - Use a list comprehension for the transformation. - Add type hints and validate arguments…
33.1s1646 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GLM 4.7 or GPT-5.6 Sol?
Per 1M output tokens, GLM 4.7 is ¥393.14 and GPT-5.6 Sol is ¥5,361 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so GLM 4.7 is cheaper.
How do the context windows of GLM 4.7 and GPT-5.6 Sol compare?
GLM 4.7 takes 202,752 tokens; GPT-5.6 Sol takes 1,050,000.
Which ranks higher, GLM 4.7 or GPT-5.6 Sol?
GPT-5.6 Sol ranks higher on the public arena (GLM 4.7 #79, GPT-5.6 Sol #1). Ranks move as the leaderboard updates.
Can I use GLM 4.7 and GPT-5.6 Sol with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "glm-4.7" or "gpt-5.6-sol" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call GLM 4.7 and GPT-5.6 Sol from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with GLM 4.7

More comparisons with GPT-5.6 Sol