Model comparison

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (Google) and MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Xiaomi), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

google logoGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewMiMo-V2.5-Pro
ProviderGoogleXiaomi
Input (per 1M tokens)¥357.4¥77.73
Output (per 1M tokens)¥2,144.4¥155.47
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥1,430¥155
Context window1,048,576 tokens1,050,000 tokens
Release date2/19/20264/22/2026
Input modalitiesaudio, file, image, text, videotext
Throughput (p50)
Arena · overall#15 · ELO 1,487#44 · ELO 1,467
Arena · Japanese#9 · ELO 1,494#52 · ELO 1,426
Arena · coding#28 · ELO 1,520#25 · ELO 1,521

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: ¥155.47 per 1M output tokens, 93% less than Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.
  • On the Overall arena board, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ranks higher (#15; MiMo-V2.5-Pro is #44).
  • On the Japanese arena board, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ranks higher (#9; MiMo-V2.5-Pro is #52).
  • On the Coding arena board, MiMo-V2.5-Pro ranks higher (#25; Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is #28).
  • For long documents, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: a 1,050,000-token context window against 1,048,576 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

There are **3** 'r's in the word 'strawberry'. Here is the step-by-step breakdown of the spelling: 1. **s** - not an 'r' 2. **t** - not an 'r' 3. **r** - **1st 'r'** 4. **a** - not an 'r' 5. **w** - not an 'r' 6. **b** - not an 'r' 7. **e** - not an 'r' 8. **r** - **2nd 'r'** 9. **r** - **3rd 'r'** 10. **y** - not an 'r' Therefore, the total count is 3.
5.3s503 output tokens

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

## Counting the r's in "strawberry" Let me go through each letter one by one: | Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? | |----------|--------|------------| | 1 | s | No | | 2 | t | No | | 3 | **r** | ✅ Yes (#1) | | 4 | a | No | | 5 | w | No | | 6 | b | No | | 7 | e | No | | 8 | **r** | ✅ Yes (#2) | | 9 | **r** | ✅ Yes (#3) | | 10 | y | No | **There are 3 r's in "strawberry."** The word breaks down as **straw·ber·ry**, and the r's appear at the end of "staw" and then twice in the double-r of "rry."
8.3s313 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

### The Cause This error occurs because the `users` prop being passed to your `UserList` component is currently `undefined`. In JavaScript, you can only use the `.map()` method on arrays. Because `users` is `undefined` (often due to data not finishing an API fetch yet, or the parent component forgetting to pass the prop), Node/React throws an error when it tries to read `.map`. ### How to Fix It You can fix this in a few different ways, depending on how you want your application to behave. #### Fix 1: Assign a Default Value (Recommended) The cleanest way to handle this is to assign a default empty array to `users` in your component's parameters. If `users` is undefined, it defaults to…
13.2s1511 output tokens

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

# Fixing `Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')` ## The Problem The error means `users` is `undefined` when the component first renders. This typically happens when: 1. **The parent component hasn't passed the `users` prop** 2. **The data is being fetched asynchronously and isn't available yet** 3. **The prop name is misspelled in the parent** For example, the parent might be rendering it like this: ```jsx // ❌ No users prop passed — `users` will be undefined <UserList /> ``` ## Solutions ### 1. Add a Default Prop Value (Simple Fix) ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); }…
14.4s680 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Here is a review of your function. While the original code works, there are several areas where it can be improved regarding **best practices**, **readability**, and **performance**. ### 1. Refactored Code Here is the improved version of your function. I will explain the specific changes below. ```python import time import requests import logging from typing import Any # Optional: Set up a logger logger = logging.getLogger(__name__) def get_data(url: str, retries: int = 3, delay: int = 2, timeout: int = 10) -> list[dict[str, Any]]: """ Fetches JSON data from a URL and extracts active items. Args: url: The API endpoint to fetch data from. retries: Number o…
23.6s3094 output tokens

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

# Code Review: `get_data` Function ## Issues Identified ``` ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ ISSUE SEVERITY MAP │ ├──────────────────┬────────────┬──────────────────────────────┤ │ Issue │ Severity │ Category │ ├──────────────────┼────────────┼──────────────────────────────┤ │ Bare except │ 🔴 High │ Error Handling / Best Prac. │ │ Silent failures │ 🔴 High │ Debuggability │ │ == True check │ 🟡 Medium │ Readability / PEP 8 │ │ Inline imports │ 🟡 Medium │ Best Practice │ │ No type hints │ 🟡 Medium │ Best Practice…
10.4s1572 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
Per 1M output tokens, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is ¥2,144.4 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro is ¥155.47 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and MiMo-V2.5-Pro compare?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview takes 1,048,576 tokens; MiMo-V2.5-Pro takes 1,050,000.
Which ranks higher, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ranks higher on the public arena (Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview #9, MiMo-V2.5-Pro #52). Ranks move as the leaderboard updates.
Can I use Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and MiMo-V2.5-Pro with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "gemini-3.1-pro-preview" or "mimo-v2.5-pro" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and MiMo-V2.5-Pro from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

More comparisons with MiMo-V2.5-Pro