Model comparison

Ember-1 vs Qwen3.8 27B

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

Ember-1 (Fireworks) and Qwen3.8 27B (Qwen), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

Ember-1qwen logoQwen3.8 27B
ProviderFireworksQwen
Input (per 1M tokens)¥536.1¥80.41
Output (per 1M tokens)¥2,680.5¥571.84
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥1,876¥366
Context window1,048,576 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Release date9/24/20268/14/2026
Input modalitiestext, imagetext, image, video
Throughput (p50)——
Arena · overallUnranked#90 · ELO 1,437
Arena · JapaneseUnranked#91 · ELO 1,383
Arena · codingUnranked#67 · ELO 1,499

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, Qwen3.8 27B: ¥571.84 per 1M output tokens, 79% less than Ember-1.
  • For long documents, Ember-1: a 1,048,576-token context window against 1,000,000 for Qwen3.8 27B.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Ember-1

# Counting the 'r's in "strawberry" **Step 1: Write out the word letter by letter** s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y **Step 2: Examine each letter one at a time** | Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? | |----------|--------|------------| | 1 | s | No | | 2 | t | No | | 3 | r | ✅ Yes (1) | | 4 | a | No | | 5 | w | No | | 6 | b | No | | 7 | e | No | | 8 | r | ✅ Yes (2) | | 9 | r | ✅ Yes (3) | | 10 | y | No | **Step 3: Verify by splitting the word into parts** - "straw" → contains **1** r - "berry" → contains **2** r's - Total: 1 + 2 = **3** ## Answer The word "strawberry" contains **3** r's.
8.2s482 output tokens

Qwen3.8 27B

The word is: **strawberry** Break it into letters: 1. s 2. t 3. r 4. a 5. w 6. b 7. e 8. r 9. r 10. y Now count the **r**’s: - 3rd letter: **r** - 8th letter: **r** - 9th letter: **r** So, there are **3** r’s in **strawberry**.
3.6s239 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Ember-1

## The Cause The error means `users` is `undefined` when the component renders, so calling `.map()` on it fails. The component itself is fine — the problem is that the `users` prop isn't being provided (or isn't ready yet). The most common reasons this happens: 1. **Async data hasn't loaded yet** — the parent fetches users from an API, and the component renders before the fetch completes: ```jsx const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // undefined initially! ``` 2. **The prop isn't passed or is misspelled** in the parent: ```jsx <UserList user={users} /> // typo: should be "users" ``` 3. **Wrong data shape** — e.g., passing the whole response object instead of `response…
18.2s960 output tokens

Qwen3.8 27B

The error means that `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders: ```jsx {users.map(...)} ``` JavaScript cannot call `.map()` on `undefined`. For example, this would cause the error: ```jsx <UserList /> ``` because `users` is not being passed in. ## Simple fix: give `users` a default value ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` Now if `users` is not passed in, it defaults to an empty array. ## Better fix: make sure the parent passes an array Wherever you use `UserList`, pass `users`: ```jsx <UserList users={users} /> ``` If `users` comes from an API or state, make sure it…
9.5s601 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Ember-1

# Code Review ## Bugs and correctness issues - **Bare `except:`** catches *everything* — including `KeyboardInterrupt` and, critically, `KeyError` from `item["active"]`. A malformed item in the response would be misinterpreted as a network failure, wasting all your retries on a data problem that retrying can't fix. - **Retrying all non-200 statuses** — a 404 or 401 will never succeed on retry. Only transient errors (connection failures, timeouts, 429, 5xx) are worth retrying. - **Wasted sleep on the final attempt** — the loop sleeps 2 seconds even after the last failure, before returning `[]`. - **Ambiguous return value** — `[]` means both "request failed" and "no active items." Callers ca…
95.0s5356 output tokens

Qwen3.8 27B

The function works at a basic level, but it has several readability, reliability, and best-practice issues. ## Main issues 1. **Imports inside the function** ```python import requests import time ``` Imports should normally be at the top of the module unless there is a specific reason to lazy-load them. 2. **Bare `except` is too broad** ```python except: time.sleep(2) ``` This catches almost everything, including `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, `KeyError`, `TypeError`, and other programming errors. It makes debugging harder and can retry failures that should not be retried. 3. **It retries on every non-`200` status** Retrying `401 Unauthorized`, `4…
205.9s13103 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Ember-1 or Qwen3.8 27B?
Per 1M output tokens, Ember-1 is ¥2,680.5 and Qwen3.8 27B is ¥571.84 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Ember-1 and Qwen3.8 27B compare?
Ember-1 takes 1,048,576 tokens; Qwen3.8 27B takes 1,000,000.
Can I use Ember-1 and Qwen3.8 27B with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "ember-1" or "qwen3.8-27b" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Ember-1 and Qwen3.8 27B from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Ember-1

More comparisons with Qwen3.8 27B