Model comparison

Claude Opus 4.6 vs MiMo-V2.5

Pricing, context window and real answers (October 2026)

Claude Opus 4.6 (Anthropic) and MiMo-V2.5 (Xiaomi), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

anthropic logoClaude Opus 4.6MiMo-V2.5
ProviderAnthropicXiaomi
Input (per 1M tokens)$5.42$0.1477
Output (per 1M tokens)$26.77$0.2954
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)$18.80$0.2954
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,050,000 tokens
Release date2/4/20264/22/2026
Input modalitiestext, imagetext, audio, image, video
Throughput (p50)152 tokens/s (n=26)74 tokens/s (n=25)
Arena · overall#7 · ELO 1,498#107 · ELO 1,434
Arena · Japanese#17 · ELO 1,484#151 · ELO 1,322
Arena · coding#6 · ELO 1,548#93 · ELO 1,491

Prices are FastMetal's rates, before tax.

Rankings: LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), CC BY 4.0, snapshot 2026-10-08; category names mapped and ratings rounded by FastMetal.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, MiMo-V2.5: $0.2954 per 1M output tokens, 99% less than Claude Opus 4.6.
  • On the Overall arena board, Claude Opus 4.6 ranks higher (#7; MiMo-V2.5 is #107).
  • On the Japanese arena board, Claude Opus 4.6 ranks higher (#17; MiMo-V2.5 is #151).
  • On the Coding arena board, Claude Opus 4.6 ranks higher (#6; MiMo-V2.5 is #93).
  • For long documents, MiMo-V2.5: a 1,050,000-token context window against 1,000,000 for Claude Opus 4.6.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Claude Opus 4.6

I need to count the number of 'r's in the word 'strawberry'. Let me go through it letter by letter. **s** - not an r **t** - not an r **r** - this is an r ✓ (count: 1) **a** - not an r **w** - not an r **b** - not an r **e** - not an r **r** - this is an r ✓ (count: 2) **r** - this is an r ✓ (count: 3) **y** - not an r There are **3** r's in 'strawberry'.
3.2s158 output tokens

MiMo-V2.5

# Counting the 'r's in 'strawberry' Let me spell the word out letter by letter: | Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? | |----------|--------|------------| | 1 | **s** | ❌ | | 2 | **t** | ❌ | | 3 | **r** | ✅ (1) | | 4 | **a** | ❌ | | 5 | **w** | ❌ | | 6 | **b** | ❌ | | 7 | **e** | ❌ | | 8 | **r** | ✅ (2) | | 9 | **r** | ✅ (3) | | 10 | **y** | ❌ | ## Answer: **3** 'r's The three r's are found at positions **3**, **8**, and **9** in the word.
14.9s313 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Claude Opus 4.6

# Understanding the Error The error `Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')` means that **`users` is `undefined`** when the component renders. You're trying to call `.map()` on a value that doesn't exist yet. This typically happens when: - The parent component doesn't pass the `users` prop - The data is being fetched asynchronously and hasn't loaded yet - The prop name is misspelled ## Solutions ### 1. Add a Default Parameter Value (Simplest Fix) ```javascript function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` ### 2. Add a Guard with Optional Chaining ```javascript function UserList({…
10.5s599 output tokens

MiMo-V2.5

This error occurs because your `users` prop is `undefined` when the component tries to call `.map()` on it. This usually happens when: 1. The parent component doesn't pass a `users` prop 2. The `users` data is still loading (asynchronous operation) 3. There's a typo in the prop name when passing from parent ## How to Fix It ### 1. Add Default Props or Prop Validation Add a default value for the `users` prop: ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } // Or with PropTypes import PropTypes from 'prop-types'; function UserList({ users }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key…
11.2s808 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Claude Opus 4.6

# Code Review: `get_data` Function ## Original Issues Identified 1. **Imports inside function** – reduces clarity and adds per-call overhead 2. **Bare `except`** – catches everything including `KeyboardInterrupt` and `SystemExit` 3. **`== True` comparison** – non-Pythonic 4. **Manual list building** – could use a list comprehension 5. **No logging** – failures happen silently 6. **No response validation** – assumes JSON is always a list of dicts with specific keys 7. **Magic numbers** – `timeout=10`, `sleep(2)` unexplained 8. **Vague function/variable names** – `r`, `data`, `get_data` --- ## Improved Version ```python import logging import time from typing import Any import requests fr…
19.9s1223 output tokens

MiMo-V2.5

# Code Review: `get_data` Function ## Issues Identified | Category | Issue | Severity | |----------|-------|----------| | Style | Imports inside function body | Medium | | Reliability | Bare `except` catches `KeyboardInterrupt`/`SystemExit` | High | | Reliability | Silent failures — no logging | Medium | | Readability | `== True` comparison (redundant) | Low | | Readability | No docstring or type hints | Medium | | Performance | Could use list comprehension | Low | | Robustness | No exponential backoff on retries | Medium | | Robustness | `r.json()` can fail silently under bare except | High | | Style | Uninformative variable names (`r`, `i`) | Low | | Config | Magic numbers hardcoded (`ti…
33.6s1854 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or MiMo-V2.5?
Per 1M output tokens, Claude Opus 4.6 is $26.77 and MiMo-V2.5 is $0.2954 on FastMetal (US dollars, before tax), so MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Claude Opus 4.6 and MiMo-V2.5 compare?
Claude Opus 4.6 takes 1,000,000 tokens; MiMo-V2.5 takes 1,050,000.
Which ranks higher, Claude Opus 4.6 or MiMo-V2.5?
Claude Opus 4.6 ranks higher on the public arena (Claude Opus 4.6 #17, MiMo-V2.5 #151). Ranks move as the leaderboard updates.
Can I use Claude Opus 4.6 and MiMo-V2.5 with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "anthropic-claude-opus-4-6" or "mimo-v2.5" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Claude Opus 4.6 and MiMo-V2.5 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Claude Opus 4.6

More comparisons with MiMo-V2.5