Model comparison

Claude Opus 5 vs MiMo-V2.5

Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)

Claude Opus 5 (Anthropic) and MiMo-V2.5 (Xiaomi), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

anthropic logoClaude Opus 5MiMo-V2.5
ProviderAnthropicXiaomi
Input (per 1M tokens)¥893.5¥25.02
Output (per 1M tokens)¥4,467.5¥50.04
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥3,127¥50
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,050,000 tokens
Release date7/24/20264/22/2026
Input modalitiestext, image, filetext, audio, image, video
Arena · overall#7 · ELO 1,492#92 · ELO 1,434
Arena · Japanese#8 · ELO 1,495#137 · ELO 1,322
Arena · coding#8 · ELO 1,533#76 · ELO 1,491

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, MiMo-V2.5: ¥50.04 per 1M output tokens, 99% less than Claude Opus 5.
  • On the Overall arena board, Claude Opus 5 ranks higher (#7; MiMo-V2.5 is #92).
  • On the Japanese arena board, Claude Opus 5 ranks higher (#8; MiMo-V2.5 is #137).
  • On the Coding arena board, Claude Opus 5 ranks higher (#8; MiMo-V2.5 is #76).
  • For long documents, MiMo-V2.5: a 1,050,000-token context window against 1,000,000 for Claude Opus 5.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Claude Opus 5

## Counting the 'r's in "strawberry" **Step 1: Break the word into individual letters** | Position | Letter | |----------|--------| | 1 | s | | 2 | t | | 3 | **r** | | 4 | a | | 5 | w | | 6 | b | | 7 | e | | 8 | **r** | | 9 | **r** | | 10 | y | **Step 2: Identify each occurrence of 'r'** - Position 3: the 'r' in the "str-" beginning - Position 8: the first 'r' in the "-rry" ending - Position 9: the second 'r' in the "-rry" ending **Step 3: Tally them up** 3 + 8 + 9 → that's **3 occurrences**. ## Answer: 3 The tricky part is that "strawberry" contains a *double* 'r' near the end ("berry"), which is easy to skim over as a single letter. Splitting the word into "straw" (1 'r') + "berry"…
7.1s466 output tokens

MiMo-V2.5

# Counting the 'r's in 'strawberry' Let me spell the word out letter by letter: | Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? | |----------|--------|------------| | 1 | **s** | ❌ | | 2 | **t** | ❌ | | 3 | **r** | ✅ (1) | | 4 | **a** | ❌ | | 5 | **w** | ❌ | | 6 | **b** | ❌ | | 7 | **e** | ❌ | | 8 | **r** | ✅ (2) | | 9 | **r** | ✅ (3) | | 10 | **y** | ❌ | ## Answer: **3** 'r's The three r's are found at positions **3**, **8**, and **9** in the word.
14.9s313 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Claude Opus 5

## What's happening The error means `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders — so calling `.map()` on it throws. React isn't the problem; the prop simply isn't there yet (or ever). The three most common causes: 1. **The parent isn't passing the prop** (or passes it under a different name / typo): ```jsx <UserList /> // users is undefined <UserList user={data} /> // wrong name ``` 2. **The data is fetched asynchronously**, and the first render happens before it arrives: ```jsx const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // undefined on first render! useEffect(() => { fetch('/api/users').then(r => r.json()).then(setUsers); }, []); return <UserList user…
15.1s1191 output tokens

MiMo-V2.5

This error occurs because your `users` prop is `undefined` when the component tries to call `.map()` on it. This usually happens when: 1. The parent component doesn't pass a `users` prop 2. The `users` data is still loading (asynchronous operation) 3. There's a typo in the prop name when passing from parent ## How to Fix It ### 1. Add Default Props or Prop Validation Add a default value for the `users` prop: ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } // Or with PropTypes import PropTypes from 'prop-types'; function UserList({ users }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key…
11.2s808 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Claude Opus 5

# Code Review: `get_data` Overall, the function works for the happy path, but there are several issues worth addressing — the most serious being the bare `except`, the silent failure mode, and the conflation of two responsibilities (fetching and transforming). ## Critical Issues ### 1. Bare `except` swallows everything ```python except: time.sleep(2) ``` This catches `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, `MemoryError`, and — importantly — bugs in your own code. If `item["active"]` raises a `KeyError` because the API changed its schema, you'll retry three times and return `[]`, giving you no indication anything went wrong. Catch `requests.RequestException` instead (the base class for all…
34.7s2823 output tokens

MiMo-V2.5

# Code Review: `get_data` Function ## Issues Identified | Category | Issue | Severity | |----------|-------|----------| | Style | Imports inside function body | Medium | | Reliability | Bare `except` catches `KeyboardInterrupt`/`SystemExit` | High | | Reliability | Silent failures — no logging | Medium | | Readability | `== True` comparison (redundant) | Low | | Readability | No docstring or type hints | Medium | | Performance | Could use list comprehension | Low | | Robustness | No exponential backoff on retries | Medium | | Robustness | `r.json()` can fail silently under bare except | High | | Style | Uninformative variable names (`r`, `i`) | Low | | Config | Magic numbers hardcoded (`ti…
33.6s1854 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5 or MiMo-V2.5?
Per 1M output tokens, Claude Opus 5 is ¥4,467.5 and MiMo-V2.5 is ¥50.04 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Claude Opus 5 and MiMo-V2.5 compare?
Claude Opus 5 takes 1,000,000 tokens; MiMo-V2.5 takes 1,050,000.
Which ranks higher, Claude Opus 5 or MiMo-V2.5?
Claude Opus 5 ranks higher on the public arena (Claude Opus 5 #8, MiMo-V2.5 #137). Ranks move as the leaderboard updates.
Can I use Claude Opus 5 and MiMo-V2.5 with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "anthropic-claude-opus-5" or "mimo-v2.5" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Claude Opus 5 and MiMo-V2.5 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Claude Opus 5

More comparisons with MiMo-V2.5