Model comparison

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-6 Luna

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

Claude Opus 4.6 (Anthropic) and GPT-6 Luna (OpenAI), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

anthropic logoClaude Opus 4.6openai logoGPT-6 Luna
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input (per 1M tokens)¥850¥17.87
Output (per 1M tokens)¥4,200¥89.35
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥2,950¥63
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,050,000 tokens
Release date2/4/20269/22/2026
Input modalitiestext, imagefile, image, text
Throughput (p50)
Arena · overall#6 · ELO 1,497Unranked
Arena · Japanese#15 · ELO 1,480Unranked
Arena · coding#5 · ELO 1,546Unranked

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, GPT-6 Luna: ¥89.35 per 1M output tokens, 98% less than Claude Opus 4.6.
  • For long documents, GPT-6 Luna: a 1,050,000-token context window against 1,000,000 for Claude Opus 4.6.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Claude Opus 4.6

I need to count the number of 'r's in the word 'strawberry'. Let me go through it letter by letter. **s** - not an r **t** - not an r **r** - this is an r ✓ (count: 1) **a** - not an r **w** - not an r **b** - not an r **e** - not an r **r** - this is an r ✓ (count: 2) **r** - this is an r ✓ (count: 3) **y** - not an r There are **3** r's in 'strawberry'.
3.2s158 output tokens

GPT-6 Luna

In **“strawberry”**, the letter **r** appears at positions 3, 8, and 9. So there are **3** “r”s.
2.7s94 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Claude Opus 4.6

# Understanding the Error The error `Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')` means that **`users` is `undefined`** when the component renders. You're trying to call `.map()` on a value that doesn't exist yet. This typically happens when: - The parent component doesn't pass the `users` prop - The data is being fetched asynchronously and hasn't loaded yet - The prop name is misspelled ## Solutions ### 1. Add a Default Parameter Value (Simplest Fix) ```javascript function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` ### 2. Add a Guard with Optional Chaining ```javascript function UserList({…
10.5s599 output tokens

GPT-6 Luna

`users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so calling `users.map(...)` throws. This often happens because the parent didn’t pass the prop or because data hasn’t loaded yet. If an empty list is acceptable until the data arrives, provide a default: ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => ( <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li> ))} </ul> ); } ``` Also check that the parent passes `users`: ```jsx <UserList users={users} /> ``` If `users` is loaded asynchronously, initialize it as an array: ```jsx const [users, setUsers] = useState([]); ``` If `null` is also possible, normalize it before mapping, for example `(users ?? […
3.8s289 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Claude Opus 4.6

# Code Review: `get_data` Function ## Original Issues Identified 1. **Imports inside function** – reduces clarity and adds per-call overhead 2. **Bare `except`** – catches everything including `KeyboardInterrupt` and `SystemExit` 3. **`== True` comparison** – non-Pythonic 4. **Manual list building** – could use a list comprehension 5. **No logging** – failures happen silently 6. **No response validation** – assumes JSON is always a list of dicts with specific keys 7. **Magic numbers** – `timeout=10`, `sleep(2)` unexplained 8. **Vague function/variable names** – `r`, `data`, `get_data` --- ## Improved Version ```python import logging import time from typing import Any import requests fr…
19.9s1223 output tokens

GPT-6 Luna

Key improvements: - Move imports to module scope. - Catch `requests.RequestException` instead of using a bare `except`; the current handler can hide programming errors as well as network failures. - Call `raise_for_status()` so unsuccessful HTTP responses are handled explicitly. - Use a list comprehension instead of building the result manually. - Replace `item["active"] == True` with `item.get("active") is True` if the field is expected to be the Boolean `True`. - Add backoff between attempts. A fixed two-second delay can make retries slower than necessary. - Decide whether failures should raise an exception or return `[]`. Returning `[]` makes a failed request indistinguishable from a suc…
16.5s1713 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT-6 Luna?
Per 1M output tokens, Claude Opus 4.6 is ¥4,200 and GPT-6 Luna is ¥89.35 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so GPT-6 Luna is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-6 Luna compare?
Claude Opus 4.6 takes 1,000,000 tokens; GPT-6 Luna takes 1,050,000.
Can I use Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-6 Luna with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "anthropic-claude-opus-4-6" or "gpt-6-luna" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-6 Luna from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Claude Opus 4.6

More comparisons with GPT-6 Luna