Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-4.1 Nano
Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)
Claude Opus 4.6 (Anthropic) and GPT-4.1 Nano (OpenAI), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.
Specs and pricing
 Claude Opus 4.6 |  GPT-4.1 Nano | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Input (per 1M tokens) | ¥850 | ¥17.87 |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | ¥4,200 | ¥71.48 |
| Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls) | ¥2,950 | ¥54 |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,047,576 tokens |
| Release date | 2/4/2026 | 4/14/2025 |
| Input modalities | text, image | image, text, file |
| Throughput (p50) | — | — |
| Arena · overall | #6 · ELO 1,497 | #243 · ELO 1,322 |
| Arena · Japanese | #15 · ELO 1,480 | #195 · ELO 1,234 |
| Arena · coding | #5 · ELO 1,546 | #226 · ELO 1,374 |
Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.
Which should you pick?
- On price, GPT-4.1 Nano: ¥71.48 per 1M output tokens, 98% less than Claude Opus 4.6.
- On the Overall arena board, Claude Opus 4.6 ranks higher (#6; GPT-4.1 Nano is #243).
- On the Japanese arena board, Claude Opus 4.6 ranks higher (#15; GPT-4.1 Nano is #195).
- On the Coding arena board, Claude Opus 4.6 ranks higher (#5; GPT-4.1 Nano is #226).
- For long documents, GPT-4.1 Nano: a 1,047,576-token context window against 1,000,000 for Claude Opus 4.6.
- If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.
Real answers to the same prompts
Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.
Claude Opus 4.6
I need to count the number of 'r's in the word 'strawberry'. Let me go through it letter by letter.
**s** - not an r
**t** - not an r
**r** - this is an r ✓ (count: 1)
**a** - not an r
**w** - not an r
**b** - not an r
**e** - not an r
**r** - this is an r ✓ (count: 2)
**r** - this is an r ✓ (count: 3)
**y** - not an r
There are **3** r's in 'strawberry'.
3.2s158 output tokens
GPT-4.1 Nano
Let's analyze the word "strawberry" step by step to count the number of 'r's.
1. Write down the word: **strawberry**
2. Examine each letter one by one:
- s: no
- t: no
- r: yes (first 'r')
- a: no
- w: no
- b: no
- e: no
- r: yes (second 'r')
- r: yes (third 'r')
- y: no
3. Counting the 'r's found:
- First 'r' (at position 3)
- Second 'r' (at position 8)
- Third 'r' (at position 9)
So, there are **3** 'r's in "strawberry."
**Final answer: 3**
2.0s183 output tokens
Debug This Error
I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…
Claude Opus 4.6
# Understanding the Error
The error `Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')` means that **`users` is `undefined`** when the component renders. You're trying to call `.map()` on a value that doesn't exist yet.
This typically happens when:
- The parent component doesn't pass the `users` prop
- The data is being fetched asynchronously and hasn't loaded yet
- The prop name is misspelled
## Solutions
### 1. Add a Default Parameter Value (Simplest Fix)
```javascript
function UserList({ users = [] }) {
return (
<ul>
{users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)}
</ul>
);
}
```
### 2. Add a Guard with Optional Chaining
```javascript
function UserList({…
10.5s599 output tokens
GPT-4.1 Nano
The error:
```
TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')
```
indicates that `users` is `undefined` at the time your `UserList` component is rendering, and you're trying to call `map` on it.
### Why is this happening?
In React, if a prop (`users` in this case) is not provided or is undefined, trying to do `users.map(...)` causes this error. This can happen if:
- The parent component does not pass `users`.
- `users` might be `null` or `undefined` initially, especially if data fetching is involved.
### How to fix it
**Option 1: Provide a default value for `users`**
Ensure that `users` defaults to an empty array if it is not provided:
```jsx
function UserList({ users…
4.3s514 output tokens
Code Review
Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…
Claude Opus 4.6
# Code Review: `get_data` Function
## Original Issues Identified
1. **Imports inside function** – reduces clarity and adds per-call overhead
2. **Bare `except`** – catches everything including `KeyboardInterrupt` and `SystemExit`
3. **`== True` comparison** – non-Pythonic
4. **Manual list building** – could use a list comprehension
5. **No logging** – failures happen silently
6. **No response validation** – assumes JSON is always a list of dicts with specific keys
7. **Magic numbers** – `timeout=10`, `sleep(2)` unexplained
8. **Vague function/variable names** – `r`, `data`, `get_data`
---
## Improved Version
```python
import logging
import time
from typing import Any
import requests
fr…
19.9s1223 output tokens
GPT-4.1 Nano
Here's a review and an improved version of your function:
### Key improvements:
1. **Move imports to the top**: Imports should generally be at the top of the file, not inside functions.
2. **Specify exception types**: Catch specific exceptions rather than a generic `except`.
3. **Use context managers if needed**: Not necessary here, but good to consider.
4. **Avoid repeated code**: The sleep statement is the same whether there is a request exception or a non-200 status.
5. **Simplify filtering**: Use list comprehensions for clarity.
6. **Improve variable names**: For readability.
7. **Add optional headers or parameters** if needed (not required here).
8. **Optional:** Add more descriptive e…
3.4s391 output tokens
Frequently asked questions
- Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT-4.1 Nano?
- Per 1M output tokens, Claude Opus 4.6 is ¥4,200 and GPT-4.1 Nano is ¥71.48 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so GPT-4.1 Nano is cheaper.
- How do the context windows of Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-4.1 Nano compare?
- Claude Opus 4.6 takes 1,000,000 tokens; GPT-4.1 Nano takes 1,047,576.
- Which ranks higher, Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT-4.1 Nano?
- Claude Opus 4.6 ranks higher on the public arena (Claude Opus 4.6 #15, GPT-4.1 Nano #195). Ranks move as the leaderboard updates.
- Can I use Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-4.1 Nano with the same API key?
- Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "anthropic-claude-opus-4-6" or "gpt-4.1-nano" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.
Try both on one API key
Create an account and add credit to call Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-4.1 Nano from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.