Model comparison

Pareto vs Solar Pro 4

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

Pareto (Unbiased) and Solar Pro 4 (Upstage), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

ParetoSolar Pro 4
ProviderUnbiasedUpstage
Input (per 1M tokens)¥446.75¥16.08
Output (per 1M tokens)¥1,340.25¥64.33
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥1,117¥48
Context window262,144 tokens524,288 tokens
Release date9/17/20268/10/2026
Input modalitiestext, imagetext
Throughput (p50)
Arena · overallUnranked#177 · ELO 1,376
Arena · JapaneseUnrankedUnranked
Arena · codingUnranked#144 · ELO 1,449

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, Solar Pro 4: ¥64.33 per 1M output tokens, 95% less than Pareto.
  • For long documents, Solar Pro 4: a 524,288-token context window against 262,144 for Pareto.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Pareto

To count the number of 'r's in the word "strawberry," let's break it down letter by letter: 1. **s** - not an 'r' 2. **t** - not an 'r' 3. **r** - **Yes**, this is the first 'r'. 4. **a** - not an 'r' 5. **w** - not an 'r' 6. **b** - not an 'r' 7. **e** - not an 'r' 8. **r** - **Yes**, this is the second 'r'. 9. **r** - **Yes**, this is the third 'r'. 10. **y** - not an 'r' Counting the occurrences: - The 3rd letter is 'r'. - The 8th letter is 'r'. - The 9th letter is 'r'. There are **3** 'r's in "strawberry".
5.5s225 output tokens

Solar Pro 4

The word "strawberry" contains **3** 'r's. Here's the step-by-step breakdown: 1. **Spell out the word explicitly** to isolate each letter: `s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y` 2. **Scan through the letters in order** and count every instance of the lowercase letter `r`: - `s` → 0 - `t` → 0 - `r` → **1** - `a` → 0 - `w` → 0 - `b` → 0 - `e` → 0 - `r` → **2** - `r` → **3** - `y` → 0 3. **Total the count**: The three `r`s appear at positions 3, 8, and 9 in the 10-letter word. **Final count: 3**
11.4s215 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Pareto

The error means `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders. Destructuring a prop does **not** protect against it: ```jsx function UserList({ users }) { // users can still be undefined return <ul>{users.map(...)}</ul>; // 💥 } ``` This usually happens when: - The parent renders `<UserList />` without passing `users` - The parent’s state starts as `undefined` before an async fetch finishes - The API response is not an array, or `users` is passed as `undefined` ## Fix 1: Default the prop to an empty array ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => ( <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li> ))} </ul> ); } ``` This works when…
11.6s1478 output tokens

Solar Pro 4

### What's Causing the Error The error `TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')` means that the `users` prop being passed to your `UserList` component is `undefined`. Since you're calling `.map()` directly on it, JavaScript throws an error because `undefined` doesn't have a `map` method. This typically happens when: - The parent component hasn't passed the `users` prop - The prop is still loading (e.g., from an API call) - The prop is conditionally undefined --- ### How to Fix It You have a few options to handle this safely: #### ✅ Option 1: Add a Default Prop Value (Recommended) Provide a fallback empty array so `.map()` always has something to work with: ```j…
24.7s539 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Pareto

The function is straightforward, but its error handling hides failures and retries requests that may never succeed. ### Main improvements - **Move imports to module scope** for readability and conventional dependency management. - **Avoid bare `except:`.** It catches everything, including programming errors and `KeyboardInterrupt`. Catch specific request failures instead. - **Retry selectively.** Timeouts, connection failures, rate limits, and certain server errors may be temporary; most other HTTP errors should surface immediately. - **Use exponential backoff** and avoid sleeping after the last attempt. - **Use a list comprehension** to express the filtering and transformation directly. -…
30.3s1090 output tokens

Solar Pro 4

Here’s a breakdown of the issues in the original function, followed by a refactored version and a detailed explanation of the improvements. ### 🔍 Key Issues in the Original Code | Area | Problem | |------|---------| | **Import organization** | `import` inside the function is evaluated on every call. Imports should live at the top of the module. | | **Exception handling** | Bare `except:` catches `SystemExit`, `KeyboardInterrupt`, and other fatal errors. Always catch specific exceptions (`requests.RequestException`). | | **Loose equality** | `== True` is redundant and can cause subtle bugs. Use `if item["active"]:` or `.get()`. | | **HTTP status handling** | Calling `.json()` only on `200`…
17.5s1172 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Pareto or Solar Pro 4?
Per 1M output tokens, Pareto is ¥1,340.25 and Solar Pro 4 is ¥64.33 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so Solar Pro 4 is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Pareto and Solar Pro 4 compare?
Pareto takes 262,144 tokens; Solar Pro 4 takes 524,288.
Can I use Pareto and Solar Pro 4 with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "pareto" or "solar-pro4" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Pareto and Solar Pro 4 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Pareto

More comparisons with Solar Pro 4