Muse Glimmer 30B vs Pareto
Pricing, context window and real answers (November 2026)
Muse Glimmer 30B (Meta) and Pareto (Unbiased), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.
Specs and pricing
| Pareto | ||
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Unbiased |
| Input (per 1M tokens) | $0.3693 | $0.88 |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | $1.59 | $3.52 |
| Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls) | $1.17 | $2.64 |
| Context window | 131,072 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Release date | 8/10/2026 | 10/15/2026 |
| Input modalities | text, image | text, image |
| Throughput (p50) | — | 25000 tokens/s (n=18) |
| Arena · overall | Unranked | Unranked |
| Arena · Japanese | Unranked | Unranked |
| Arena · coding | Unranked | Unranked |
Prices are FastMetal's rates, before tax.
Rankings: LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), CC BY 4.0, snapshot 2026-10-28; category names mapped and ratings rounded by FastMetal.
Which should you pick?
- On price, Muse Glimmer 30B: $1.59 per 1M output tokens, 55% less than Pareto.
- For long documents, Pareto: a 1,048,576-token context window against 131,072 for Muse Glimmer 30B.
- If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.
Real answers to the same prompts
Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.
Muse Glimmer 30B
Pareto
Debug This Error
I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…
Muse Glimmer 30B
Pareto
Code Review
Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…
Muse Glimmer 30B
Pareto
Frequently asked questions
- Which is cheaper, Muse Glimmer 30B or Pareto?
- Per 1M output tokens, Muse Glimmer 30B is $1.59 and Pareto is $3.52 on FastMetal (US dollars, before tax), so Muse Glimmer 30B is cheaper.
- How do the context windows of Muse Glimmer 30B and Pareto compare?
- Muse Glimmer 30B takes 131,072 tokens; Pareto takes 1,048,576.
- Can I use Muse Glimmer 30B and Pareto with the same API key?
- Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "muse-glimmer-30b" or "pareto" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.
Try both on one API key
Create an account and add credit to call Muse Glimmer 30B and Pareto from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.