MiMo-V2.5 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)
MiMo-V2.5 (Xiaomi) and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (Qwen), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.
Specs and pricing
| MiMo-V2.5 |  Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Qwen |
| Input (per 1M tokens) | ¥25.02 | ¥351.83 |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | ¥50.04 | ¥1,055.5 |
| Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls) | ¥50 | ¥880 |
| Context window | 1,050,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Release date | 4/22/2026 | 8/12/2026 |
| Input modalities | text, audio, image, video | text |
| Arena · overall | #92 · ELO 1,434 | Unranked |
| Arena · Japanese | #137 · ELO 1,322 | Unranked |
| Arena · coding | #76 · ELO 1,491 | Unranked |
Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.
Which should you pick?
- On price, MiMo-V2.5: ¥50.04 per 1M output tokens, 95% less than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B.
- For long documents, MiMo-V2.5: a 1,050,000-token context window against 1,048,576 for Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B.
- If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.
Real answers to the same prompts
Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.
MiMo-V2.5
# Counting the 'r's in 'strawberry'
Let me spell the word out letter by letter:
| Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? |
|----------|--------|------------|
| 1 | **s** | ❌ |
| 2 | **t** | ❌ |
| 3 | **r** | ✅ (1) |
| 4 | **a** | ❌ |
| 5 | **w** | ❌ |
| 6 | **b** | ❌ |
| 7 | **e** | ❌ |
| 8 | **r** | ✅ (2) |
| 9 | **r** | ✅ (3) |
| 10 | **y** | ❌ |
## Answer: **3** 'r's
The three r's are found at positions **3**, **8**, and **9** in the word.
14.9s313 output tokens
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
To count the number of **“r”**s in **“strawberry”**, spell it out letter by letter:
**s t r a w b e r r y**
Now check each letter:
1. s — not r
2. t — not r
3. r — yes, count 1
4. a — not r
5. w — not r
6. b — not r
7. e — not r
8. r — yes, count 2
9. r — yes, count 3
10. y — not r
So there are **3** “r”s in **strawberry**.
1.3s203 output tokens
Debug This Error
I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…
MiMo-V2.5
This error occurs because your `users` prop is `undefined` when the component tries to call `.map()` on it. This usually happens when:
1. The parent component doesn't pass a `users` prop
2. The `users` data is still loading (asynchronous operation)
3. There's a typo in the prop name when passing from parent
## How to Fix It
### 1. Add Default Props or Prop Validation
Add a default value for the `users` prop:
```jsx
function UserList({ users = [] }) {
return (
<ul>
{users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)}
</ul>
);
}
// Or with PropTypes
import PropTypes from 'prop-types';
function UserList({ users }) {
return (
<ul>
{users.map(user => <li key…
11.2s808 output tokens
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
The error happens because `users` is `undefined` when React tries to render this line:
```js
{users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)}
```
JavaScript cannot call `.map()` on `undefined`.
In your component:
```js
function UserList({ users }) {
return (
<ul>
{users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)}
</ul>
);
}
```
React expects `users` to be an array, but something is rendering `<UserList />` without providing a valid `users` prop.
---
## Common causes
### 1. The parent component is not passing `users`
For example:
```js
<UserList />
```
Instead of:
```js
<UserList users={users} />
```
---
### 2. The data has not loaded yet
If `users…
10.9s1318 output tokens
Professional Email
Write a professional email to a client explaining that the project delivery will be delayed by two weeks due to unexpected technical challenges discovered during integration testing. The tone should be apologetic but con…
MiMo-V2.5
**Subject:** Update on [Project Name] Delivery Timeline
Dear [Client Name],
I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to provide you with an important update regarding the timeline for [Project Name].
During recent integration testing, our team identified some unexpected technical challenges that require additional attention to ensure the quality and reliability you expect from our partnership. While we had initially planned to deliver the final product by [Original Delivery Date], we now anticipate a revised delivery date of **[New Delivery Date]** — a delay of approximately two weeks.
Please know that we take full responsibility for this adjustment and sincerely apologiz…
8.3s523 output tokens
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Subject: Updated Project Timeline – Revised Delivery Date
Dear [Client Name],
I hope this message finds you well.
I’m writing to provide an important update regarding the delivery timeline for [Project Name]. During our recent integration testing phase, we identified several unexpected technical challenges that require additional resolution to ensure the final deliverable meets the quality and performance standards we committed to.
After carefully reviewing the scope of these items with our technical team, we have determined that the project delivery will need to be extended by two weeks. I sincerely apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. Please be assured that we are taking imm…
4.6s449 output tokens
Frequently asked questions
- Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5 or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
- Per 1M output tokens, MiMo-V2.5 is ¥50.04 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is ¥1,055.5 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper.
- How do the context windows of MiMo-V2.5 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B compare?
- MiMo-V2.5 takes 1,050,000 tokens; Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B takes 1,048,576.
- Can I use MiMo-V2.5 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B with the same API key?
- Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "mimo-v2.5" or "qwen3.8-2.4t-a95b" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.
Try both on one API key
Create an account and add credit to call MiMo-V2.5 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.