Model comparison

MiMo-V2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

MiMo-V2.5 (Xiaomi) and MiMo-V2.6-Flash (Xiaomi), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

MiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.6-Flash
ProviderXiaomiXiaomi
Input (per 1M tokens)¥25.02¥25.02
Output (per 1M tokens)¥50.04¥50.04
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥50¥50
Context window1,050,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Release date4/22/20269/21/2026
Input modalitiestext, audio, image, videotext, image, video, audio
Throughput (p50)
Arena · overall#96 · ELO 1,434Unranked
Arena · Japanese#141 · ELO 1,321Unranked
Arena · coding#81 · ELO 1,491Unranked

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • Output pricing is identical (¥50.04 per 1M tokens).
  • For long documents, MiMo-V2.5: a 1,050,000-token context window against 1,048,576 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

MiMo-V2.5

# Counting the 'r's in 'strawberry' Let me spell the word out letter by letter: | Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? | |----------|--------|------------| | 1 | **s** | ❌ | | 2 | **t** | ❌ | | 3 | **r** | ✅ (1) | | 4 | **a** | ❌ | | 5 | **w** | ❌ | | 6 | **b** | ❌ | | 7 | **e** | ❌ | | 8 | **r** | ✅ (2) | | 9 | **r** | ✅ (3) | | 10 | **y** | ❌ | ## Answer: **3** 'r's The three r's are found at positions **3**, **8**, and **9** in the word.
14.9s313 output tokens

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

## Counting the 'r's in 'strawberry' **Step 1: Write out each letter of the word individually:** `s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y` **Step 2: Go through each letter one by one and check if it's an 'r':** | Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? | Running Count | |----------|--------|------------|---------------| | 1 | s | ❌ | 0 | | 2 | t | ❌ | 0 | | 3 | **r** | ✅ | **1** | | 4 | a | ❌ | 1 | | 5 | w | ❌ | 1 | | 6 | b | ❌ | 1 | | 7 | e | ❌ | 1 | | 8 | **r** | ✅ | **2** | | 9 | **r** | ✅ | **3** | | 10 | y | ❌ | 3 | **Answer: There are 3 'r's in 'strawberry'.** 🍓 The first 'r' appears at position 3 (after "st"), and the remaining two are the double 'rr' near the end of the word.
6.5s379 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

MiMo-V2.5

This error occurs because your `users` prop is `undefined` when the component tries to call `.map()` on it. This usually happens when: 1. The parent component doesn't pass a `users` prop 2. The `users` data is still loading (asynchronous operation) 3. There's a typo in the prop name when passing from parent ## How to Fix It ### 1. Add Default Props or Prop Validation Add a default value for the `users` prop: ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } // Or with PropTypes import PropTypes from 'prop-types'; function UserList({ users }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key…
11.2s808 output tokens

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

## Cause of the Error The error occurs because the `users` prop is `undefined` when the component first renders. When you try to call `.map()` on `undefined`, it throws: ``` TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') ``` This typically happens when: 1. The **parent component** hasn't passed `users` yet (e.g., data is still loading from an API) 2. The prop name **doesn't match** between parent and child 3. The prop is **intentionally optional** but used unconditionally ## Fixes ### 1. Default parameter value (simplest fix) Set a default value for `users` so it's always an array: ```js function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user =>…
7.6s547 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

MiMo-V2.5

# Code Review: `get_data` Function ## Issues Identified | Category | Issue | Severity | |----------|-------|----------| | Style | Imports inside function body | Medium | | Reliability | Bare `except` catches `KeyboardInterrupt`/`SystemExit` | High | | Reliability | Silent failures — no logging | Medium | | Readability | `== True` comparison (redundant) | Low | | Readability | No docstring or type hints | Medium | | Performance | Could use list comprehension | Low | | Robustness | No exponential backoff on retries | Medium | | Robustness | `r.json()` can fail silently under bare except | High | | Style | Uninformative variable names (`r`, `i`) | Low | | Config | Magic numbers hardcoded (`ti…
33.6s1854 output tokens

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

# Code Review: `get_data` ## Issues Identified | Category | Issue | |----------|-------| | **Readability** | Imports inside function, vague names (`i`, `r`), no docstring/type hints | | **Performance** | Manual loop instead of list comprehension, no `requests.Session` (no connection reuse) | | **Best Practices** | Bare `except`, `== True`, silent failures, no backoff, no error propagation | --- ## Improved Version ```python import time import logging import requests from typing import Optional logger = logging.getLogger(__name__) def get_data( url: str, retries: int = 3, timeout: float = 10, backoff_factor: float = 2.0, ) -> Optional[list[dict]]: """ Fetch dat…
18.9s1208 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
Both are ¥50.04 per 1M output tokens on FastMetal (yen, before tax).
How do the context windows of MiMo-V2.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash compare?
MiMo-V2.5 takes 1,050,000 tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Flash takes 1,048,576.
Can I use MiMo-V2.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "mimo-v2.5" or "mimo-v2.6-flash" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call MiMo-V2.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with MiMo-V2.5

More comparisons with MiMo-V2.6-Flash