Inkling vs LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4
Pricing, context window and real answers (October 2026)
Inkling (Thinking Machines) and LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 (LLM-jp), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.
Specs and pricing
| Inkling | LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Thinking Machines | LLM-jp |
| Input (per 1M tokens) | $1.01 | $0.102 |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | $4.28 | $0.5035 |
| Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls) | $3.14 | $0.3537 |
| Context window | 524,288 tokens | 4,096 tokens |
| Release date | 7/17/2026 | 3/21/2026 |
| Input modalities | text, image, audio | text |
| Throughput (p50) | 120 tokens/s (n=20) | 125 tokens/s (n=25) |
| Arena · overall | #95 · ELO 1,441 | Unranked |
| Arena · Japanese | #56 · ELO 1,430 | Unranked |
| Arena · coding | #91 · ELO 1,492 | Unranked |
Prices are FastMetal's rates, before tax.
Rankings: LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), CC BY 4.0, snapshot 2026-10-08; category names mapped and ratings rounded by FastMetal.
Which should you pick?
- On price, LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4: $0.5035 per 1M output tokens, 88% less than Inkling.
- For long documents, Inkling: a 524,288-token context window against 4,096 for LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4.
- If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.
Real answers to the same prompts
Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.
Inkling
Let's break down the word **"strawberry"** letter by letter:
1. **s**
2. **t**
3. **r** ← (1st 'r')
4. **a**
5. **w**
6. **b**
7. **e**
8. **r** ← (2nd 'r')
9. **r** ← (3rd 'r')
10. **y**
So the spelling is: s-t-**r**-a-w-b-e-**r**-**r**-y
Counting them up:
- One 'r' in "str" (the 3rd letter)
- Two 'r's in "berry" (the 8th and 9th letters)
**Total: 3 'r's** in "strawberry".**
2.4s417 output tokens
LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4
To count the number of 'r's in the word 'strawberry', follow these steps:
1. Identify the word: The word we are examining is 'strawberry'.
2. Understand the task: We need to find and count all occurrences of the letter 'r' in this word.
3. Begin with the first letter: The first letter is 's', which is not 'r', so we move on to the next letter.
4. Proceed to the second letter: The second letter is 't', which is also not 'r', so we continue to the third letter.
5. Reach the third letter: The third letter is 'r'. We have found one 'r'.
6. Continue to the fourth letter: The fourth letter is 'a', which is not 'r', so we move on to the fifth letter.
7. Examine the fifth letter: The fifth letter i…
4.0s400 output tokens
Debug This Error
I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…
Inkling
The error occurs because `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so `users.map` fails.
This usually happens when:
- The parent doesn't pass the prop (`<UserList />` instead of `<UserList users={...} />`)
- Data is still loading (e.g., API hasn't returned yet)
## Quick Fix
Provide a default empty array so `.map` always has an array to work with:
```jsx
function UserList({ users = [] }) {
return (
<ul>
{users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)}
</ul>
);
}
```
Alternatively, guard against undefined explicitly:
```jsx
function UserList({ users }) {
if (!users) return null; // or a loading state
return (
<ul>
{users.map(user => <li key={…
4.9s585 output tokens
LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4
The error TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') suggests that the 'users' argument passed to the UserList component is undefined or does not have a 'map' method.
The cause of the problem may be that the users variable is not being passed correctly or is not defined in the parent component. Check the props being passed to the UserList component to ensure that they are defined and contain the expected data.
To fix the issue, you can add some error handling and debugging to your component. Try logging the users variable to the console to verify that it is not undefined:
```jsx
function UserList({ users }) {
console.log("Users:", users);
if (!users) {
return <…
3.0s279 output tokens
Code Review
Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…
Inkling
Here is a review with an improved version followed by explanations.
### Issues in the original
- **Imports inside the function**: Re-importing on every call is inefficient.
- **Bare `except:`**: Catches `SystemExit`, `KeyboardInterrupt`, etc.
- **Silent failures**: No logging; errors disappear.
- **Magic numbers**: `10`, `2`, `200` are hard-coded.
- **Data validation missing**: Assumes `data` is a list and every item has `"active"`, `"name"`, and `"id"` (will crash with `KeyError`).
- **Performance**: Uses `.append()` in a loop instead of a list comprehension.
- **Ambiguous return**: `[]` means both "success with no results" and "total failure".
### Improved version
```python
import loggi…
54.1s5649 output tokens
LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4
The provided Python function aims to get data from a URL using the requests library, filter out specific items based on their "active" field, and return the result. Here are some suggestions to improve readability, performance, and adherence to best practices:
1. Configure the linter (e.g., flake8 or pylint) to ensure code quality and enforce a consistent coding style.
2. Use type hints to improve readability and maintainability.
3. Use context managers (with statement) for handling requests:
4. Rewrite the function using a more functional programming style:
Here's the improved version of the function:
```python
import requests
import time
from typing import List, Dict, Any
def get_da…
3.9s406 output tokens
Frequently asked questions
- Which is cheaper, Inkling or LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4?
- Per 1M output tokens, Inkling is $4.28 and LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 is $0.5035 on FastMetal (US dollars, before tax), so LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 is cheaper.
- How do the context windows of Inkling and LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 compare?
- Inkling takes 524,288 tokens; LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 takes 4,096.
- Can I use Inkling and LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 with the same API key?
- Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "inkling" or "llm-jp-3.1-8x13b-instruct4" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.
Try both on one API key
Create an account and add credit to call Inkling and LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.
More comparisons with Inkling
More comparisons with LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4
- LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 vs Claude Opus 5
- LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 vs Claude Sonnet 5
- LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
- LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 vs Claude Fable 5.1
- LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 vs Claude Fable 5
- LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 vs Claude Opus 4.8
- LLM-jp-3.1 8x13B instruct4 details