Model comparison

Hy4 vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Pricing, context window and real answers (November 2026)

Hy4 (Tencent) and Kimi K2.7 Code (Moonshot), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

tencent logoHy4moonshotai logoKimi K2.7 Code
ProviderTencentMoonshot
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.8799$0.3505
Output (per 1M tokens)$2.64$3.38
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)$2.20$2.04
Context window1,000,000 tokens262,144 tokens
Release date11/4/20266/12/2026
Input modalitiestexttext, image
Throughput (p50)—106 tokens/s (n=27)
Arena · overallUnrankedUnranked
Arena · JapaneseUnrankedUnranked
Arena · codingUnrankedUnranked

Prices are FastMetal's rates, before tax.

Rankings: LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), CC BY 4.0, snapshot 2026-10-28; category names mapped and ratings rounded by FastMetal.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, Hy4: $2.64 per 1M output tokens, 22% less than Kimi K2.7 Code.
  • For long documents, Hy4: a 1,000,000-token context window against 262,144 for Kimi K2.7 Code.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Hy4 or Kimi K2.7 Code?
Per 1M output tokens, Hy4 is $2.64 and Kimi K2.7 Code is $3.38 on FastMetal (US dollars, before tax), so Hy4 is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Hy4 and Kimi K2.7 Code compare?
Hy4 takes 1,000,000 tokens; Kimi K2.7 Code takes 262,144.
Can I use Hy4 and Kimi K2.7 Code with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "hy4" or "japan-kimi-k2.7-code" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Hy4 and Kimi K2.7 Code from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Hy4

More comparisons with Kimi K2.7 Code