Model comparison

Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Max

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

Grok 4.7 (xAI) and Qwen3.8 Max (Qwen), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

x-ai logoGrok 4.7qwen logoQwen3.8 Max
ProviderxAIQwen
Input (per 1M tokens)¥276.2¥357.4
Output (per 1M tokens)¥828.6¥1,072.2
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥691¥894
Context window500,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Release date9/21/20268/3/2026
Input modalitiestext, image, filetext, image
Throughput (p50)
Arena · overallUnranked#22 · ELO 1,481
Arena · JapaneseUnranked#18 · ELO 1,469
Arena · codingUnranked#24 · ELO 1,522

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, Grok 4.7: ¥828.6 per 1M output tokens, 23% less than Qwen3.8 Max.
  • For long documents, Qwen3.8 Max: a 1,000,000-token context window against 500,000 for Grok 4.7.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Grok 4.7

The word "strawberry" consists of the letters S-T-R-A-W-B-E-R-R-Y. - The 3rd letter is R. - The 8th letter is R. - The 9th letter is R. This gives a total of 3 R's.
4.7s299 output tokens

Qwen3.8 Max

The word **strawberry** is spelled: **s t r a w b e r r y** Now count the letter **r**: 1. s 2. t 3. **r** ← first r 4. a 5. w 6. b 7. e 8. **r** ← second r 9. **r** ← third r 10. y There are **3** letters **r** in **strawberry**.
3.5s156 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Grok 4.7

The error happens because `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so calling `.map` on it fails. That usually means the parent rendered `<UserList />` (or `<UserList users={undefined} />`) before data was loaded, or the prop name doesn’t match. **Fix it in the component** so it tolerates a missing list: ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` Or guard the call: ```jsx function UserList({ users }) { return ( <ul> {(users ?? []).map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` **Also check the parent** so you pass an array once data exists: `…
12.8s393 output tokens

Qwen3.8 Max

The error means `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` tries to render: ```js {users.map(user => ...)} ``` JavaScript cannot call `.map()` on `undefined`, so React throws: ```text Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') ``` ## Most likely cause The parent component is rendering `UserList` without passing a valid `users` array, or it is passing `users` before the data has loaded. For example: ```jsx <UserList /> ``` or: ```jsx <UserList users={undefined} /> ``` or: ```jsx const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // undefined initially ``` Then later: ```jsx <UserList users={users} /> ``` On the first render, `users` is still `undefined`. --- ## Fix 1: Give `users` a d…
17.7s1020 output tokens

Professional Email

Write a professional email to a client explaining that the project delivery will be delayed by two weeks due to unexpected technical challenges discovered during integration testing. The tone should be apologetic but con…

Grok 4.7

Subject: Update on [Project Name] Delivery Timeline Dear [Client Name], I am writing to inform you of a change to the delivery timeline for [Project Name]. During integration testing, we identified unexpected technical challenges that require additional resolution before we can responsibly hand over the final deliverable. As a result, we need to extend the delivery date by two weeks, with the revised completion date now set for [New Delivery Date]. I sincerely apologize for this delay and for any inconvenience it may cause. We take our commitments seriously, and this adjustment is being made to ensure the solution meets the quality and reliability standards you expect. To keep the projec…
9.1s517 output tokens

Qwen3.8 Max

Subject: Revised Project Delivery Timeline – Updated Schedule and Next Steps Dear [Client Name], I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to provide an update on the current status of the project and to inform you that, during our recent integration testing phase, we encountered several unexpected technical challenges that will impact the original delivery timeline. After careful review with the technical team, we now anticipate the revised delivery date will be [insert date – two weeks from original delivery date]. Please accept my sincere apologies for this delay. We understand the importance of this project and the expectations tied to the original schedule. While this situati…
11.9s547 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or Qwen3.8 Max?
Per 1M output tokens, Grok 4.7 is ¥828.6 and Qwen3.8 Max is ¥1,072.2 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so Grok 4.7 is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Grok 4.7 and Qwen3.8 Max compare?
Grok 4.7 takes 500,000 tokens; Qwen3.8 Max takes 1,000,000.
Can I use Grok 4.7 and Qwen3.8 Max with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "grok-4.7" or "qwen3.8-max" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Grok 4.7 and Qwen3.8 Max from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Grok 4.7

More comparisons with Qwen3.8 Max