gpt-oss-20b vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
Pricing, context window and real answers (October 2026)
gpt-oss-20b (OpenAI) and Kimi K3.1 Pro (Moonshot), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.
Specs and pricing
 gpt-oss-20b |  Kimi K3.1 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Moonshot |
| Input (per 1M tokens) | $0.0317 | $2.11 |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | $0.1477 | $10.55 |
| Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls) | $0.1055 | $7.39 |
| Context window | 131,072 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Release date | 8/5/2025 | 10/23/2026 |
| Input modalities | text | text, image, video |
| Throughput (p50) | 114 tokens/s (n=21) | — |
| Arena · overall | #269 · ELO 1,317 | Unranked |
| Arena · Japanese | #195 · ELO 1,256 | Unranked |
| Arena · coding | #251 · ELO 1,368 | Unranked |
Prices are FastMetal's rates, before tax.
Rankings: LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), CC BY 4.0, snapshot 2026-10-22; category names mapped and ratings rounded by FastMetal.
Which should you pick?
- On price, gpt-oss-20b: $0.1477 per 1M output tokens, 99% less than Kimi K3.1 Pro.
- For long documents, Kimi K3.1 Pro: a 1,048,576-token context window against 131,072 for gpt-oss-20b.
- If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.
Real answers to the same prompts
Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.
gpt-oss-20b
**Count of ‘r’ in “strawberry”: 3**
---
### Step‑by‑step reasoning
1. **Write out the word in individual letters**
```
s t r a w b e r r y
```
2. **Identify each ‘r’**
- The first ‘r’: appears after the “t” → **r**
- The second ‘r’: appears in the part “berry” → **r**
- The third ‘r’: the next letter after that → **r**
3. **Verify there are no more letters left**
The remaining letters are “b”, “e”, “y”, none of which are “r”.
4. **Count the identified ‘r’s**
1 (first) + 1 (second) + 1 (third) = **3**
---
### Quick recap
- Word: **strawberry**
- Letters containing “r”: positions 3, 8, and 9.
- Total count: **3**.
11.6s371 output tokens
Kimi K3.1 Pro
There are **3** ‘r’s in **“strawberry.”**
1. Write out each letter: **s – t – r – a – w – b – e – r – r – y**
2. Locate the ‘r’s: positions **3, 8, and 9**.
3. Count them: **1 + 1 + 1 = 3**.
11.3s
Debug This Error
I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…
gpt-oss-20b
### Why does the error happen?
`users.map(...)` can only run when **`users` is an array**.
The stack trace shows that the crash happens on line 12 of `UserList.js`, which is the
exact spot where the code tries to call `.map`.
The value that is being passed to `UserList` (or the initial value that the parent
creates) is **`undefined`** (or it could be `null`/`{}`). When JavaScript tries to
read `users.map`, it throws:
```
TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')
```
Typical reasons for this are:
1. The parent component **didn’t pass the `users` prop** at all.
2. The parent passed it but the value was **`undefined` / `null`** because data
hasn’t been loaded ye…
11.4s1303 output tokens
Kimi K3.1 Pro
## What's causing the error
The error means `users` is `undefined` when the component renders, and you can't call `.map()` on `undefined`. The component itself is fine — the problem is that whatever renders `<UserList />` either isn't passing the prop, or is passing a value that isn't an array yet.
The most common cause is **async data fetching**: the parent renders `UserList` before the data has loaded.
```jsx
function App() {
const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // ❌ undefined on first render
useEffect(() => {
fetch('/api/users')
.then(res => res.json())
.then(setUsers);
}, []);
return <UserList users={users} />; // users is undefined here initially
}
```
On…
36.3s
Code Review
Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…
gpt-oss-20b
Below is a quick “code‑review” style list that touches the three axes you asked for – **readability**, **performance**, and **best practices**.
After the bullet‑list I’ll paste a refactored version that incorporates the most common fixes.
---
## 1. Readability
| Issue | Why it hurts | Quick fix |
|-------|--------------|-----------|
| **Imports inside the function** | Every call recompiles the import tables and makes the module’s top‑level slower. | Move `import requests` and `import time` to the module’s global header. |
| **Bare `except:`** | Catches *everything* (KeyboardInterrupt, SystemExit, MemoryError, etc.) and swallows useful tracebacks. | Catch only the expected network-relate…
24.6s2267 output tokens
Kimi K3.1 Pro
The timeout and bounded retry loop are good starting points. The biggest issue is that failures—and even programming errors—are silently converted into retries and then `[]`.
### Suggested improvements
- **Avoid bare `except:`**. It catches `KeyboardInterrupt`, `KeyError`, JSON/schema errors, and other bugs. Retry only expected transient network failures; let malformed responses fail visibly.
- **Use a deliberate retry policy**. Retrying `401`, `403`, or `404` usually wastes time. Retry only transient statuses, use exponential backoff, and avoid sleeping after the final attempt.
- **Do not use `[]` for both failure and no results**. Prefer raising the final exception so callers can disting…
560.2s
Frequently asked questions
- Which is cheaper, gpt-oss-20b or Kimi K3.1 Pro?
- Per 1M output tokens, gpt-oss-20b is $0.1477 and Kimi K3.1 Pro is $10.55 on FastMetal (US dollars, before tax), so gpt-oss-20b is cheaper.
- How do the context windows of gpt-oss-20b and Kimi K3.1 Pro compare?
- gpt-oss-20b takes 131,072 tokens; Kimi K3.1 Pro takes 1,048,576.
- Can I use gpt-oss-20b and Kimi K3.1 Pro with the same API key?
- Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "gpt-oss-20b" or "kimi-k3.1-pro" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.
Try both on one API key
Create an account and add credit to call gpt-oss-20b and Kimi K3.1 Pro from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.