Model comparison

GPT-5.4 Nano vs GPT-5 Mini

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

GPT-5.4 Nano (OpenAI) and GPT-5 Mini (OpenAI), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

openai logoGPT-5.4 Nanoopenai logoGPT-5 Mini
ProviderOpenAIOpenAI
Input (per 1M tokens)¥35.74¥44.68
Output (per 1M tokens)¥223.38¥357.4
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥147¥223
Context window400,000 tokens400,000 tokens
Release date3/17/20268/7/2025
Input modalitiesfile, image, texttext, image, file
Throughput (p50)
Arena · overall#146 · ELO 1,402#163 · ELO 1,390
Arena · Japanese#107 · ELO 1,368#109 · ELO 1,365
Arena · coding#128 · ELO 1,460#172 · ELO 1,431

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, GPT-5.4 Nano: ¥223.38 per 1M output tokens, 37% less than GPT-5 Mini.
  • On the Overall arena board, GPT-5.4 Nano ranks higher (#146; GPT-5 Mini is #163).
  • On the Japanese arena board, GPT-5.4 Nano ranks higher (#107; GPT-5 Mini is #109).
  • On the Coding arena board, GPT-5.4 Nano ranks higher (#128; GPT-5 Mini is #172).
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

GPT-5.4 Nano

**Step 1:** Write the word: **strawberry** **Step 2:** Count each letter **r** in the word: - s **t r** a w b e **r r** y There are **3** **r**’s in total (**one** after the **t**, and **two** near the end). ✅ **Answer: 3**
1.5s86 output tokens

GPT-5 Mini

We examine the word "strawberry" letter by letter: 1. s — not an r (count = 0) 2. t — not an r (count = 0) 3. r — an r (count = 1) 4. a — not an r (count = 1) 5. w — not an r (count = 1) 6. b — not an r (count = 1) 7. e — not an r (count = 1) 8. r — an r (count = 2) 9. r — an r (count = 3) 10. y — not an r (count = 3) Total number of 'r's = 3.
5.2s382 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

GPT-5.4 Nano

This error means that **`users` is `undefined` (or otherwise not an array)** when your component renders, so calling `users.map(...)` throws: ```js users.map(...) ^^^^ reading 'map' of undefined ``` ### Why it happens Common causes: - You render `<UserList />` before data has loaded (e.g., `users` comes from an async fetch). - The parent component passes the wrong prop name (e.g., `user` instead of `users`). - The API/parent state initializes `users` as `undefined` rather than `[]`. - You’re destructuring a prop incorrectly upstream. ### Fix options #### 1) Ensure `users` is always an array (recommended) Initialize/default it in the component: ```js function UserList({ users = []…
3.3s383 output tokens

GPT-5 Mini

That error means users is undefined when you call users.map(...). map is an Array method, so calling it on undefined throws "Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')". Common causes - The parent component didn't pass a users prop. - users is still loading (e.g. fetched asynchronously) and is null/undefined until the fetch completes. - The parent initialized users to null instead of an empty array. How to fix Choose one or more of these approaches depending on your app: 1) Initialize the parent state as an array If users is state in the parent, initialize it to [] so the child always receives an array: const [users, setUsers] = useState([]); // fetch and setUsers(data) 2) Give…
8.0s966 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

GPT-5.4 Nano

Here are key improvements (readability, performance, robustness, best practices) and a revised version of your function. ## What to improve 1. **Avoid bare `except:`** Catch specific exceptions from `requests` (e.g., `requests.exceptions.RequestException`) to avoid hiding bugs. 2. **Prefer `raise_for_status()` or check status codes clearly** `r.raise_for_status()` is a common pattern. 3. **Use exponential backoff (or at least a clear retry delay)** Instead of sleeping the same amount every time, consider increasing delay. 4. **Reuse a `requests.Session()` (optional but best practice)** If this function is called repeatedly, passing a session or creating one outside i…
4.4s718 output tokens

GPT-5 Mini

Thanks — this is a nice simple function, but it can be improved in several ways: move imports to module scope, avoid broad except:, use connection pooling (Session) for performance, use specific exception types, add logging and docstring, avoid comparing to True, use list comprehensions, validate JSON shape, and implement backoff (or use urllib3 Retry). Below are two improved alternatives and a short rationale for the changes. 1) A simple, clear improvement (small changes, explicit errors, backoff + jitter) - Moves imports to top-level - Uses requests.Session for connection pooling - Catches specific exceptions (requests.RequestException, ValueError) - Uses list comprehension and item.get(…
13.6s1702 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 Nano or GPT-5 Mini?
Per 1M output tokens, GPT-5.4 Nano is ¥223.38 and GPT-5 Mini is ¥357.4 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so GPT-5.4 Nano is cheaper.
How do the context windows of GPT-5.4 Nano and GPT-5 Mini compare?
GPT-5.4 Nano takes 400,000 tokens; GPT-5 Mini takes 400,000.
Which ranks higher, GPT-5.4 Nano or GPT-5 Mini?
GPT-5.4 Nano ranks higher on the public arena (GPT-5.4 Nano #107, GPT-5 Mini #109). Ranks move as the leaderboard updates.
Can I use GPT-5.4 Nano and GPT-5 Mini with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "gpt-5.4-nano" or "gpt-5-mini" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call GPT-5.4 Nano and GPT-5 Mini from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with GPT-5.4 Nano

More comparisons with GPT-5 Mini