Model comparison

GPT-4o-mini vs Kimi K3

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

GPT-4o-mini (OpenAI) and Kimi K3 (Moonshot), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

openai logoGPT-4o-minimoonshotai logoKimi K3
ProviderOpenAIMoonshot
Input (per 1M tokens)¥26.81¥504
Output (per 1M tokens)¥107.22¥2,520
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥80¥1,764
Context window128,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Release date7/18/20247/16/2026
Input modalitiestext, image, filetext, image
Throughput (p50)
Arena · overall#251 · ELO 1,318#17 · ELO 1,485
Arena · Japanese#187 · ELO 1,250#2 · ELO 1,511
Arena · coding#259 · ELO 1,348#7 · ELO 1,538

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, GPT-4o-mini: ¥107.22 per 1M output tokens, 96% less than Kimi K3.
  • On the Overall arena board, Kimi K3 ranks higher (#17; GPT-4o-mini is #251).
  • On the Japanese arena board, Kimi K3 ranks higher (#2; GPT-4o-mini is #187).
  • On the Coding arena board, Kimi K3 ranks higher (#7; GPT-4o-mini is #259).
  • For long documents, Kimi K3: a 1,048,576-token context window against 128,000 for GPT-4o-mini.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

GPT-4o-mini

To count the number of 'r's in the word "strawberry," we can follow these steps: 1. **Identify the word**: We have the word "strawberry." 2. **Break down the letters**: Let's write out the letters in the word: - s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y 3. **Locate the 'r's**: Now, we need to look for the letter 'r' among these letters. - In the list of letters, we can see: - The first 'r' is in the 3rd position. - The second 'r' is in the 8th position. - The third 'r' is in the 9th position. 4. **Count the occurrences**: We check each position we identified: - There are three occurrences of 'r' in the word "strawberry." 5. **Conclusion**:…
2.1s239 output tokens

Kimi K3

# Counting the 'r's in "strawberry" **Step 1: Write out each letter with its position** | Position | Letter | |----------|--------| | 1 | s | | 2 | t | | 3 | **r** ✓ | | 4 | a | | 5 | w | | 6 | b | | 7 | e | | 8 | **r** ✓ | | 9 | **r** ✓ | | 10 | y | **Step 2: Identify each 'r'** - Position 3: the 'r' in "st**r**" - Position 8: the first 'r' in "be**r**ry" - Position 9: the second 'r' in "ber**r**y" **Step 3: Verify by splitting the word** "Strawberry" = "straw" + "berry" - "straw" contains **1** r - "berry" contains **2** r's **Answer: There are 3 r's in "strawberry."** 🍓
12.2s594 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

GPT-4o-mini

The error you're encountering, `TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')`, indicates that the `users` prop is `undefined` when you try to call the `map` method on it. In your `UserList` component, you're attempting to use `users.map(...)`, but if the `users` prop is not provided or is `undefined`, this will throw an error. ### Fixing the Error 1. **Default Props**: You can set a default value for the `users` prop to prevent the error when it is `undefined`. ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { // Default to an empty array return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ```…
5.0s511 output tokens

Kimi K3

## What's causing it The error means `users` is `undefined` when the component renders — `.map()` only exists on arrays, so calling it on `undefined` throws. Your component code is fine; the problem is **upstream**: whatever renders `<UserList />` isn't passing a valid array. The most common culprit is **async data fetching with uninitialized state** in the parent: ```jsx function App() { const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // ← undefined! useEffect(() => { fetch('/api/users') .then(res => res.json()) .then(setUsers); }, []); return <UserList users={users} />; // undefined on first render } ``` The component renders *before* the fetch resolves, so `users` is `…
47.5s1756 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

GPT-4o-mini

Your Python function, `get_data`, essentially performs a GET request, handles retries on failure, and processes the response JSON to return a filtered list of dictionaries. Below, I've highlighted several improvements regarding readability, performance, and best practices: 1. **Avoid blanket exceptions**: It’s best practice to specify which exceptions you expect, allowing for better debugging and error handling. 2. **Use `requests` built-in exception handling**: Handle specific requests exceptions, such as `requests.exceptions.RequestException`. 3. **Improve condition checks**: Check for `item['active']` directly instead of comparing to `True`, which is more Pythonic. 4. **Use `time.sl…
8.8s628 output tokens

Kimi K3

This works, but there are several issues worth addressing. Here's a breakdown, followed by an improved version. ## Issues ### Correctness & best practices 1. **Bare `except:`** — catches *everything*, including `KeyboardInterrupt` and programming bugs like `KeyError` on a malformed item (which then get pointlessly retried). Catch `requests.RequestException` specifically. 2. **Silent failures** — errors are swallowed with no logging, and returning `[]` makes "API is down" indistinguishable from "no active items." At minimum, log; ideally, raise after the final attempt. 3. **Retrying non-retryable errors** — a 400/401/404 will never succeed on retry, but the code sleeps and retries anyway. O…
57.6s8060 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o-mini or Kimi K3?
Per 1M output tokens, GPT-4o-mini is ¥107.22 and Kimi K3 is ¥2,520 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so GPT-4o-mini is cheaper.
How do the context windows of GPT-4o-mini and Kimi K3 compare?
GPT-4o-mini takes 128,000 tokens; Kimi K3 takes 1,048,576.
Which ranks higher, GPT-4o-mini or Kimi K3?
Kimi K3 ranks higher on the public arena (GPT-4o-mini #187, Kimi K3 #2). Ranks move as the leaderboard updates.
Can I use GPT-4o-mini and Kimi K3 with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "gpt-4o-mini" or "kimi-k3" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call GPT-4o-mini and Kimi K3 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with GPT-4o-mini

More comparisons with Kimi K3