Model comparison

GPT-4o-mini vs Grok 4.5

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

GPT-4o-mini (OpenAI) and Grok 4.5 (xAI), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

openai logoGPT-4o-minix-ai logoGrok 4.5
ProviderOpenAIxAI
Input (per 1M tokens)¥26.81¥357.4
Output (per 1M tokens)¥107.22¥1,072.2
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥80¥894
Context window128,000 tokens500,000 tokens
Release date7/18/20247/8/2026
Input modalitiestext, image, filetext, image, file
Throughput (p50)
Arena · overall#251 · ELO 1,318#42 · ELO 1,468
Arena · Japanese#187 · ELO 1,250#37 · ELO 1,443
Arena · coding#259 · ELO 1,348#33 · ELO 1,518

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, GPT-4o-mini: ¥107.22 per 1M output tokens, 90% less than Grok 4.5.
  • On the Overall arena board, Grok 4.5 ranks higher (#42; GPT-4o-mini is #251).
  • On the Japanese arena board, Grok 4.5 ranks higher (#37; GPT-4o-mini is #187).
  • On the Coding arena board, Grok 4.5 ranks higher (#33; GPT-4o-mini is #259).
  • For long documents, Grok 4.5: a 500,000-token context window against 128,000 for GPT-4o-mini.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

GPT-4o-mini

To count the number of 'r's in the word "strawberry," we can follow these steps: 1. **Identify the word**: We have the word "strawberry." 2. **Break down the letters**: Let's write out the letters in the word: - s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y 3. **Locate the 'r's**: Now, we need to look for the letter 'r' among these letters. - In the list of letters, we can see: - The first 'r' is in the 3rd position. - The second 'r' is in the 8th position. - The third 'r' is in the 9th position. 4. **Count the occurrences**: We check each position we identified: - There are three occurrences of 'r' in the word "strawberry." 5. **Conclusion**:…
2.1s239 output tokens

Grok 4.5

The word "strawberry" is spelled as follows: **s-t-r-a-w-b-e-r-r-y** - Position 1: **s** - Position 2: **t** - Position 3: **r** ← (1st "r") - Position 4: **a** - Position 5: **w** - Position 6: **b** - Position 7: **e** - Position 8: **r** ← (2nd "r") - Position 9: **r** ← (3rd "r") - Position 10: **y** There are **3** occurrences of the letter "r".
6.5s350 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

GPT-4o-mini

The error you're encountering, `TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')`, indicates that the `users` prop is `undefined` when you try to call the `map` method on it. In your `UserList` component, you're attempting to use `users.map(...)`, but if the `users` prop is not provided or is `undefined`, this will throw an error. ### Fixing the Error 1. **Default Props**: You can set a default value for the `users` prop to prevent the error when it is `undefined`. ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { // Default to an empty array return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ```…
5.0s511 output tokens

Grok 4.5

The error occurs because `users` is `undefined` when the component renders, so calling `.map()` on it fails. This commonly happens when: - The parent component doesn’t pass a `users` prop at all - The data is loaded asynchronously and is still `undefined` on the first render - The prop is accidentally set to `undefined`/`null` instead of an array ### Fixes **1. Default to an empty array (simplest)** ```js function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => ( <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li> ))} </ul> ); } ``` **2. Optional chaining (also fine)** ```js function UserList({ users }) { return ( <ul> {users?.map(user => (…
7.9s507 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

GPT-4o-mini

Your Python function, `get_data`, essentially performs a GET request, handles retries on failure, and processes the response JSON to return a filtered list of dictionaries. Below, I've highlighted several improvements regarding readability, performance, and best practices: 1. **Avoid blanket exceptions**: It’s best practice to specify which exceptions you expect, allowing for better debugging and error handling. 2. **Use `requests` built-in exception handling**: Handle specific requests exceptions, such as `requests.exceptions.RequestException`. 3. **Improve condition checks**: Check for `item['active']` directly instead of comparing to `True`, which is more Pythonic. 4. **Use `time.sl…
8.8s628 output tokens

Grok 4.5

## Code Review: `get_data` ### Issues | Area | Problem | |------|---------| | **Imports** | `requests` / `time` inside the function — re-imported on every call; belong at module level | | **Exceptions** | Bare `except:` swallows `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, and hides bugs | | **Boolean check** | `item["active"] == True` is unidiomatic; truthiness is enough | | **Loop** | Manual `for` + `append` can be a list comprehension | | **Retries** | Sleeps on non-200 but never logs or distinguishes failure modes; unused loop variable `i` | | **Robustness** | No guard for non-list JSON, missing keys (`KeyError`), or invalid JSON | | **API** | Magic numbers (`timeout=10`, `sleep=2`); no docstrin…
25.3s1363 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o-mini or Grok 4.5?
Per 1M output tokens, GPT-4o-mini is ¥107.22 and Grok 4.5 is ¥1,072.2 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so GPT-4o-mini is cheaper.
How do the context windows of GPT-4o-mini and Grok 4.5 compare?
GPT-4o-mini takes 128,000 tokens; Grok 4.5 takes 500,000.
Which ranks higher, GPT-4o-mini or Grok 4.5?
Grok 4.5 ranks higher on the public arena (GPT-4o-mini #187, Grok 4.5 #37). Ranks move as the leaderboard updates.
Can I use GPT-4o-mini and Grok 4.5 with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "gpt-4o-mini" or "grok-4.5" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call GPT-4o-mini and Grok 4.5 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with GPT-4o-mini

More comparisons with Grok 4.5