Model comparison

GPT-4.1 Nano vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

GPT-4.1 Nano (OpenAI) and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (Qwen), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

openai logoGPT-4.1 Nanoqwen logoQwen3.8 2.4T A95B
ProviderOpenAIQwen
Input (per 1M tokens)¥17.87¥351.83
Output (per 1M tokens)¥71.48¥1,055.5
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥54¥880
Context window1,047,576 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Release date4/14/20258/12/2026
Input modalitiesimage, text, filetext
Throughput (p50)
Arena · overall#243 · ELO 1,322Unranked
Arena · Japanese#195 · ELO 1,234Unranked
Arena · coding#226 · ELO 1,374Unranked

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, GPT-4.1 Nano: ¥71.48 per 1M output tokens, 93% less than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B.
  • For long documents, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: a 1,048,576-token context window against 1,047,576 for GPT-4.1 Nano.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

GPT-4.1 Nano

Let's analyze the word "strawberry" step by step to count the number of 'r's. 1. Write down the word: **strawberry** 2. Examine each letter one by one: - s: no - t: no - r: yes (first 'r') - a: no - w: no - b: no - e: no - r: yes (second 'r') - r: yes (third 'r') - y: no 3. Counting the 'r's found: - First 'r' (at position 3) - Second 'r' (at position 8) - Third 'r' (at position 9) So, there are **3** 'r's in "strawberry." **Final answer: 3**
2.0s183 output tokens

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

To count the number of **“r”**s in **“strawberry”**, spell it out letter by letter: **s t r a w b e r r y** Now check each letter: 1. s — not r 2. t — not r 3. r — yes, count 1 4. a — not r 5. w — not r 6. b — not r 7. e — not r 8. r — yes, count 2 9. r — yes, count 3 10. y — not r So there are **3** “r”s in **strawberry**.
1.3s203 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

GPT-4.1 Nano

The error: ``` TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') ``` indicates that `users` is `undefined` at the time your `UserList` component is rendering, and you're trying to call `map` on it. ### Why is this happening? In React, if a prop (`users` in this case) is not provided or is undefined, trying to do `users.map(...)` causes this error. This can happen if: - The parent component does not pass `users`. - `users` might be `null` or `undefined` initially, especially if data fetching is involved. ### How to fix it **Option 1: Provide a default value for `users`** Ensure that `users` defaults to an empty array if it is not provided: ```jsx function UserList({ users…
4.3s514 output tokens

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

The error happens because `users` is `undefined` when React tries to render this line: ```js {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} ``` JavaScript cannot call `.map()` on `undefined`. In your component: ```js function UserList({ users }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` React expects `users` to be an array, but something is rendering `<UserList />` without providing a valid `users` prop. --- ## Common causes ### 1. The parent component is not passing `users` For example: ```js <UserList /> ``` Instead of: ```js <UserList users={users} /> ``` --- ### 2. The data has not loaded yet If `users…
10.9s1318 output tokens

Professional Email

Write a professional email to a client explaining that the project delivery will be delayed by two weeks due to unexpected technical challenges discovered during integration testing. The tone should be apologetic but con…

GPT-4.1 Nano

Subject: Update on Project Delivery Timeline Dear [Client's Name], I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to inform you about a development regarding the timeline for the delivery of your project. During our recent integration testing phase, we encountered some unforeseen technical challenges that require additional resolution time. While our team is actively working to address these issues, this will unfortunately result in a delay of approximately two weeks to ensure the delivery meets our high standards of quality and performance. We sincerely apologize for any inconvenience this may cause and want to assure you that we are taking specific mitigation steps to minimize the de…
1.9s248 output tokens

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Subject: Updated Project Timeline – Revised Delivery Date Dear [Client Name], I hope this message finds you well. I’m writing to provide an important update regarding the delivery timeline for [Project Name]. During our recent integration testing phase, we identified several unexpected technical challenges that require additional resolution to ensure the final deliverable meets the quality and performance standards we committed to. After carefully reviewing the scope of these items with our technical team, we have determined that the project delivery will need to be extended by two weeks. I sincerely apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. Please be assured that we are taking imm…
4.6s449 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 Nano or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
Per 1M output tokens, GPT-4.1 Nano is ¥71.48 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is ¥1,055.5 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so GPT-4.1 Nano is cheaper.
How do the context windows of GPT-4.1 Nano and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B compare?
GPT-4.1 Nano takes 1,047,576 tokens; Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B takes 1,048,576.
Can I use GPT-4.1 Nano and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "gpt-4.1-nano" or "qwen3.8-2.4t-a95b" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call GPT-4.1 Nano and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with GPT-4.1 Nano

More comparisons with Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B