Model comparison

GPT-4.1 Nano vs Muse Glimmer 30B

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

GPT-4.1 Nano (OpenAI) and Muse Glimmer 30B (Meta), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

openai logoGPT-4.1 Nanometa logoMuse Glimmer 30B
ProviderOpenAIMeta
Input (per 1M tokens)¥17.87¥58.8
Output (per 1M tokens)¥71.48¥252
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥54¥185
Context window1,047,576 tokens131,072 tokens
Release date4/14/20258/10/2026
Input modalitiesimage, text, filetext, image
Throughput (p50)
Arena · overall#243 · ELO 1,322Unranked
Arena · Japanese#195 · ELO 1,234Unranked
Arena · coding#226 · ELO 1,374Unranked

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, GPT-4.1 Nano: ¥71.48 per 1M output tokens, 72% less than Muse Glimmer 30B.
  • For long documents, GPT-4.1 Nano: a 1,047,576-token context window against 131,072 for Muse Glimmer 30B.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

GPT-4.1 Nano

Let's analyze the word "strawberry" step by step to count the number of 'r's. 1. Write down the word: **strawberry** 2. Examine each letter one by one: - s: no - t: no - r: yes (first 'r') - a: no - w: no - b: no - e: no - r: yes (second 'r') - r: yes (third 'r') - y: no 3. Counting the 'r's found: - First 'r' (at position 3) - Second 'r' (at position 8) - Third 'r' (at position 9) So, there are **3** 'r's in "strawberry." **Final answer: 3**
2.0s183 output tokens

Muse Glimmer 30B

The word is 10 letters long. Scanning left to right: 1. **s** - not r 2. **t** - not r 3. **r** - 1st r 4. **a** - not r 5. **w** - not r 6. **b** - not r 7. **e** - not r 8. **r** - 2nd r 9. **r** - 3rd r 10. **y** - not r `s t r a w b e r r y` There is one r in `str-`, and a double `rr` in `-berry`. Total = 1 + 2 = 3 r's.
8.0s614 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

GPT-4.1 Nano

The error: ``` TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') ``` indicates that `users` is `undefined` at the time your `UserList` component is rendering, and you're trying to call `map` on it. ### Why is this happening? In React, if a prop (`users` in this case) is not provided or is undefined, trying to do `users.map(...)` causes this error. This can happen if: - The parent component does not pass `users`. - `users` might be `null` or `undefined` initially, especially if data fetching is involved. ### How to fix it **Option 1: Provide a default value for `users`** Ensure that `users` defaults to an empty array if it is not provided: ```jsx function UserList({ users…
4.3s514 output tokens

Muse Glimmer 30B

The error is exactly what it says: you're trying to call `.map` on `users`, but `users` is `undefined` at render time. ```js {users.map(user => ...)} ^^^^^^ ``` `Cannot read properties of undefined [reading 'map']` means `users` was never defined / passed in, so `users.map` throws. This happens very commonly with React components that receive async data. The parent renders `UserList` before the data has loaded, so the prop is `undefined` / `null` on the first render. ### Fix it by guarding the prop **1. Default parameter to an empty array - simplest** ```js function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul>…
5.6s888 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

GPT-4.1 Nano

Here's a review and an improved version of your function: ### Key improvements: 1. **Move imports to the top**: Imports should generally be at the top of the file, not inside functions. 2. **Specify exception types**: Catch specific exceptions rather than a generic `except`. 3. **Use context managers if needed**: Not necessary here, but good to consider. 4. **Avoid repeated code**: The sleep statement is the same whether there is a request exception or a non-200 status. 5. **Simplify filtering**: Use list comprehensions for clarity. 6. **Improve variable names**: For readability. 7. **Add optional headers or parameters** if needed (not required here). 8. **Optional:** Add more descriptive e…
3.4s391 output tokens

Muse Glimmer 30B

The function works but it mixes concerns and hides errors. Here are the main issues: **Readability** * Imports inside the function. `import requests` and `import time` should be at module level. * Bare `except:` catches `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit` and masks bugs. * Unused loop variable `i` and vague names `r`, `data`. * No docstring / type hints, so the contract is unclear. * `if item["active"] == True:` is redundant and will raise `KeyError` if the key is missing. **Correctness / Best practices** * `except:` should be `except requests.RequestException`. JSON parsing can also fail. * Check `r.status_code == 200` is too narrow. Use `raise_for_status` / `r.ok` for any 2xx. * Fixed 2 se…
12.0s1795 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 Nano or Muse Glimmer 30B?
Per 1M output tokens, GPT-4.1 Nano is ¥71.48 and Muse Glimmer 30B is ¥252 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so GPT-4.1 Nano is cheaper.
How do the context windows of GPT-4.1 Nano and Muse Glimmer 30B compare?
GPT-4.1 Nano takes 1,047,576 tokens; Muse Glimmer 30B takes 131,072.
Can I use GPT-4.1 Nano and Muse Glimmer 30B with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "gpt-4.1-nano" or "muse-glimmer-30b" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call GPT-4.1 Nano and Muse Glimmer 30B from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with GPT-4.1 Nano

More comparisons with Muse Glimmer 30B