Model comparison

GPT-4.1 Nano vs Grok 4.7

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

GPT-4.1 Nano (OpenAI) and Grok 4.7 (xAI), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

openai logoGPT-4.1 Nanox-ai logoGrok 4.7
ProviderOpenAIxAI
Input (per 1M tokens)¥17.87¥276.2
Output (per 1M tokens)¥71.48¥828.6
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥54¥691
Context window1,047,576 tokens500,000 tokens
Release date4/14/20259/21/2026
Input modalitiesimage, text, filetext, image, file
Throughput (p50)
Arena · overall#243 · ELO 1,322Unranked
Arena · Japanese#195 · ELO 1,234Unranked
Arena · coding#226 · ELO 1,374Unranked

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, GPT-4.1 Nano: ¥71.48 per 1M output tokens, 91% less than Grok 4.7.
  • For long documents, GPT-4.1 Nano: a 1,047,576-token context window against 500,000 for Grok 4.7.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

GPT-4.1 Nano

Let's analyze the word "strawberry" step by step to count the number of 'r's. 1. Write down the word: **strawberry** 2. Examine each letter one by one: - s: no - t: no - r: yes (first 'r') - a: no - w: no - b: no - e: no - r: yes (second 'r') - r: yes (third 'r') - y: no 3. Counting the 'r's found: - First 'r' (at position 3) - Second 'r' (at position 8) - Third 'r' (at position 9) So, there are **3** 'r's in "strawberry." **Final answer: 3**
2.0s183 output tokens

Grok 4.7

The word "strawberry" consists of the letters S-T-R-A-W-B-E-R-R-Y. - The 3rd letter is R. - The 8th letter is R. - The 9th letter is R. This gives a total of 3 R's.
4.7s299 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

GPT-4.1 Nano

The error: ``` TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') ``` indicates that `users` is `undefined` at the time your `UserList` component is rendering, and you're trying to call `map` on it. ### Why is this happening? In React, if a prop (`users` in this case) is not provided or is undefined, trying to do `users.map(...)` causes this error. This can happen if: - The parent component does not pass `users`. - `users` might be `null` or `undefined` initially, especially if data fetching is involved. ### How to fix it **Option 1: Provide a default value for `users`** Ensure that `users` defaults to an empty array if it is not provided: ```jsx function UserList({ users…
4.3s514 output tokens

Grok 4.7

The error happens because `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so calling `.map` on it fails. That usually means the parent rendered `<UserList />` (or `<UserList users={undefined} />`) before data was loaded, or the prop name doesn’t match. **Fix it in the component** so it tolerates a missing list: ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` Or guard the call: ```jsx function UserList({ users }) { return ( <ul> {(users ?? []).map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` **Also check the parent** so you pass an array once data exists: `…
12.8s393 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

GPT-4.1 Nano

Here's a review and an improved version of your function: ### Key improvements: 1. **Move imports to the top**: Imports should generally be at the top of the file, not inside functions. 2. **Specify exception types**: Catch specific exceptions rather than a generic `except`. 3. **Use context managers if needed**: Not necessary here, but good to consider. 4. **Avoid repeated code**: The sleep statement is the same whether there is a request exception or a non-200 status. 5. **Simplify filtering**: Use list comprehensions for clarity. 6. **Improve variable names**: For readability. 7. **Add optional headers or parameters** if needed (not required here). 8. **Optional:** Add more descriptive e…
3.4s391 output tokens

Grok 4.7

## Review The function works for the happy path, but it hides failures, retries the wrong errors, and is harder to read and debug than it needs to be. ### Issues 1. **Imports inside the function** — move them to module level unless you have a strong reason (circular imports, optional dependency). 2. **Bare `except`** — swallows `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, and programming bugs. Catch specific exceptions. 3. **Retries non-retryable failures** — 4xx (except maybe 429) will not succeed on retry. Network errors and 5xx are the usual candidates. 4. **Sleeps after the last attempt** — wastes up to 2 seconds before returning `[]`. 5. **Unused loop variable** and vague names (`r`, `i`). 6.…
22.3s1525 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 Nano or Grok 4.7?
Per 1M output tokens, GPT-4.1 Nano is ¥71.48 and Grok 4.7 is ¥828.6 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so GPT-4.1 Nano is cheaper.
How do the context windows of GPT-4.1 Nano and Grok 4.7 compare?
GPT-4.1 Nano takes 1,047,576 tokens; Grok 4.7 takes 500,000.
Can I use GPT-4.1 Nano and Grok 4.7 with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "gpt-4.1-nano" or "grok-4.7" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call GPT-4.1 Nano and Grok 4.7 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with GPT-4.1 Nano

More comparisons with Grok 4.7