Model comparison

GPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-6 Luna

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

GPT-4.1 Nano (OpenAI) and GPT-6 Luna (OpenAI), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

openai logoGPT-4.1 Nanoopenai logoGPT-6 Luna
ProviderOpenAIOpenAI
Input (per 1M tokens)¥17.87¥17.87
Output (per 1M tokens)¥71.48¥89.35
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥54¥63
Context window1,047,576 tokens1,050,000 tokens
Release date4/14/20259/22/2026
Input modalitiesimage, text, filefile, image, text
Throughput (p50)
Arena · overall#243 · ELO 1,322Unranked
Arena · Japanese#195 · ELO 1,234Unranked
Arena · coding#226 · ELO 1,374Unranked

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, GPT-4.1 Nano: ¥71.48 per 1M output tokens, 20% less than GPT-6 Luna.
  • For long documents, GPT-6 Luna: a 1,050,000-token context window against 1,047,576 for GPT-4.1 Nano.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

GPT-4.1 Nano

Let's analyze the word "strawberry" step by step to count the number of 'r's. 1. Write down the word: **strawberry** 2. Examine each letter one by one: - s: no - t: no - r: yes (first 'r') - a: no - w: no - b: no - e: no - r: yes (second 'r') - r: yes (third 'r') - y: no 3. Counting the 'r's found: - First 'r' (at position 3) - Second 'r' (at position 8) - Third 'r' (at position 9) So, there are **3** 'r's in "strawberry." **Final answer: 3**
2.0s183 output tokens

GPT-6 Luna

In **“strawberry”**, the letter **r** appears at positions 3, 8, and 9. So there are **3** “r”s.
2.7s94 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

GPT-4.1 Nano

The error: ``` TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') ``` indicates that `users` is `undefined` at the time your `UserList` component is rendering, and you're trying to call `map` on it. ### Why is this happening? In React, if a prop (`users` in this case) is not provided or is undefined, trying to do `users.map(...)` causes this error. This can happen if: - The parent component does not pass `users`. - `users` might be `null` or `undefined` initially, especially if data fetching is involved. ### How to fix it **Option 1: Provide a default value for `users`** Ensure that `users` defaults to an empty array if it is not provided: ```jsx function UserList({ users…
4.3s514 output tokens

GPT-6 Luna

`users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so calling `users.map(...)` throws. This often happens because the parent didn’t pass the prop or because data hasn’t loaded yet. If an empty list is acceptable until the data arrives, provide a default: ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => ( <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li> ))} </ul> ); } ``` Also check that the parent passes `users`: ```jsx <UserList users={users} /> ``` If `users` is loaded asynchronously, initialize it as an array: ```jsx const [users, setUsers] = useState([]); ``` If `null` is also possible, normalize it before mapping, for example `(users ?? […
3.8s289 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

GPT-4.1 Nano

Here's a review and an improved version of your function: ### Key improvements: 1. **Move imports to the top**: Imports should generally be at the top of the file, not inside functions. 2. **Specify exception types**: Catch specific exceptions rather than a generic `except`. 3. **Use context managers if needed**: Not necessary here, but good to consider. 4. **Avoid repeated code**: The sleep statement is the same whether there is a request exception or a non-200 status. 5. **Simplify filtering**: Use list comprehensions for clarity. 6. **Improve variable names**: For readability. 7. **Add optional headers or parameters** if needed (not required here). 8. **Optional:** Add more descriptive e…
3.4s391 output tokens

GPT-6 Luna

Key improvements: - Move imports to module scope. - Catch `requests.RequestException` instead of using a bare `except`; the current handler can hide programming errors as well as network failures. - Call `raise_for_status()` so unsuccessful HTTP responses are handled explicitly. - Use a list comprehension instead of building the result manually. - Replace `item["active"] == True` with `item.get("active") is True` if the field is expected to be the Boolean `True`. - Add backoff between attempts. A fixed two-second delay can make retries slower than necessary. - Decide whether failures should raise an exception or return `[]`. Returning `[]` makes a failed request indistinguishable from a suc…
16.5s1713 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 Nano or GPT-6 Luna?
Per 1M output tokens, GPT-4.1 Nano is ¥71.48 and GPT-6 Luna is ¥89.35 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so GPT-4.1 Nano is cheaper.
How do the context windows of GPT-4.1 Nano and GPT-6 Luna compare?
GPT-4.1 Nano takes 1,047,576 tokens; GPT-6 Luna takes 1,050,000.
Can I use GPT-4.1 Nano and GPT-6 Luna with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "gpt-4.1-nano" or "gpt-6-luna" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call GPT-4.1 Nano and GPT-6 Luna from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with GPT-4.1 Nano

More comparisons with GPT-6 Luna