Model comparison

GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Grok 4.5

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

GLM 5.3 FlashX (Z.ai) and Grok 4.5 (xAI), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

z-ai logoGLM 5.3 FlashXx-ai logoGrok 4.5
ProviderZ.aixAI
Input (per 1M tokens)¥66.12¥357.4
Output (per 1M tokens)¥223.38¥1,072.2
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥178¥894
Context window1,048,576 tokens500,000 tokens
Release date9/18/20267/8/2026
Input modalitiestext, image, videotext, image, file
Throughput (p50)
Arena · overallUnranked#42 · ELO 1,468
Arena · JapaneseUnranked#37 · ELO 1,443
Arena · codingUnranked#33 · ELO 1,518

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, GLM 5.3 FlashX: ¥223.38 per 1M output tokens, 79% less than Grok 4.5.
  • For long documents, GLM 5.3 FlashX: a 1,048,576-token context window against 500,000 for Grok 4.5.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

GLM 5.3 FlashX

# Counting 'r's in "strawberry" **Step 1: Write out each letter with its position** | Position | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |----------|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|----| | Letter | s | t | r | a | w | b | e | r | r | y | **Step 2: Check each letter one by one** - Position 1: **s** → not an 'r' - Position 2: **t** → not an 'r' - Position 3: **r** → ✅ 'r' found (count: 1) - Position 4: **a** → not an 'r' - Position 5: **w** → not an 'r' - Position 6: **b** → not an 'r' - Position 7: **e** → not an 'r' - Position 8: **r** → ✅ 'r' found (count: 2) - Position 9: **r** → ✅ 'r' found (count: 3) - Position 10: **y** → not an 'r' **Step 3: Tally the results** The 'r's a…
4.1s549 output tokens

Grok 4.5

The word "strawberry" is spelled as follows: **s-t-r-a-w-b-e-r-r-y** - Position 1: **s** - Position 2: **t** - Position 3: **r** ← (1st "r") - Position 4: **a** - Position 5: **w** - Position 6: **b** - Position 7: **e** - Position 8: **r** ← (2nd "r") - Position 9: **r** ← (3rd "r") - Position 10: **y** There are **3** occurrences of the letter "r".
6.5s350 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

GLM 5.3 FlashX

## What's Happening The error means `users` is `undefined` at the time `UserList` renders. You're calling `.map()` on `undefined`, which JavaScript doesn't allow. This almost always happens for one of these reasons: 1. **The parent isn't passing the prop** — `<UserList />` with no `users` prop 2. **Data hasn't loaded yet** — you're fetching asynchronously, so the first render happens before the data arrives 3. **Prop name mismatch** — e.g., passing `user` but reading `users` 4. **Parent state initialized to `undefined`** — e.g., `useState()` instead of `useState([])` ## Fixes ### Option 1: Default parameter (simplest) ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul>…
6.8s934 output tokens

Grok 4.5

The error occurs because `users` is `undefined` when the component renders, so calling `.map()` on it fails. This commonly happens when: - The parent component doesn’t pass a `users` prop at all - The data is loaded asynchronously and is still `undefined` on the first render - The prop is accidentally set to `undefined`/`null` instead of an array ### Fixes **1. Default to an empty array (simplest)** ```js function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => ( <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li> ))} </ul> ); } ``` **2. Optional chaining (also fine)** ```js function UserList({ users }) { return ( <ul> {users?.map(user => (…
7.9s507 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

GLM 5.3 FlashX

# Code Review The function works, but there are several issues worth addressing — including one subtle bug caused by the bare `except`. ## Correctness issues (most important) 1. **Bare `except:` is dangerous and masks a bug.** It catches *everything*, including `KeyboardInterrupt` and `SystemExit` (so Ctrl+C during a retry sleep is swallowed). Worse: because your data-processing loop sits inside the `try`, a `KeyError` from a malformed item is treated as a network failure — triggering a pointless re-download of the URL and silently discarding the real error. Catch only `requests.RequestException` (and `ValueError` for JSON decode failures). 2. **Silent failure.** Returning `[]` on error…
36.9s5836 output tokens

Grok 4.5

## Code Review: `get_data` ### Issues | Area | Problem | |------|---------| | **Imports** | `requests` / `time` inside the function — re-imported on every call; belong at module level | | **Exceptions** | Bare `except:` swallows `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, and hides bugs | | **Boolean check** | `item["active"] == True` is unidiomatic; truthiness is enough | | **Loop** | Manual `for` + `append` can be a list comprehension | | **Retries** | Sleeps on non-200 but never logs or distinguishes failure modes; unused loop variable `i` | | **Robustness** | No guard for non-list JSON, missing keys (`KeyError`), or invalid JSON | | **API** | Magic numbers (`timeout=10`, `sleep=2`); no docstrin…
25.3s1363 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 FlashX or Grok 4.5?
Per 1M output tokens, GLM 5.3 FlashX is ¥223.38 and Grok 4.5 is ¥1,072.2 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so GLM 5.3 FlashX is cheaper.
How do the context windows of GLM 5.3 FlashX and Grok 4.5 compare?
GLM 5.3 FlashX takes 1,048,576 tokens; Grok 4.5 takes 500,000.
Can I use GLM 5.3 FlashX and Grok 4.5 with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "glm-5.3-flashx" or "grok-4.5" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call GLM 5.3 FlashX and Grok 4.5 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with GLM 5.3 FlashX

More comparisons with Grok 4.5