Model comparison

GLM 5.3 Flash vs Grok 4.7

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

GLM 5.3 Flash (Z.ai) and Grok 4.7 (xAI), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

z-ai logoGLM 5.3 Flashx-ai logoGrok 4.7
ProviderZ.aixAI
Input (per 1M tokens)¥26.81¥276.2
Output (per 1M tokens)¥89.35¥828.6
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥71¥691
Context window1,310,720 tokens500,000 tokens
Release date8/26/20269/21/2026
Input modalitiestext, image, videotext, image, file
Throughput (p50)
Arena · overall#29 · ELO 1,475Unranked
Arena · Japanese#51 · ELO 1,427Unranked
Arena · coding#20 · ELO 1,525Unranked

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, GLM 5.3 Flash: ¥89.35 per 1M output tokens, 89% less than Grok 4.7.
  • For long documents, GLM 5.3 Flash: a 1,310,720-token context window against 500,000 for Grok 4.7.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

GLM 5.3 Flash

# Counting 'r's in 'strawberry' **Step 1: Write out the word letter by letter** s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y **Step 2: Check each letter one at a time** | Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? | |----------|--------|-----------| | 1 | s | No | | 2 | t | No | | 3 | r | **Yes! (1)** | | 4 | a | No | | 5 | w | No | | 6 | b | No | | 7 | e | No | | 8 | r | **Yes! (2)** | | 9 | r | **Yes! (3)** | | 10 | y | No | **Step 3: Add up the matches** The 'r's appear at positions 3, 8, and 9. ## Answer: There are **3** 'r's in "strawberry" 🍓
7.2s449 output tokens

Grok 4.7

The word "strawberry" consists of the letters S-T-R-A-W-B-E-R-R-Y. - The 3rd letter is R. - The 8th letter is R. - The 9th letter is R. This gives a total of 3 R's.
4.7s299 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

GLM 5.3 Flash

## What's happening The error means the `users` prop is `undefined` at the time `UserList` renders. Since you can't call `.map()` on `undefined`, JavaScript throws the TypeError. This usually happens for one of these reasons: 1. **The parent isn't passing the prop** — rendering `<UserList />` without `users`, or with a typo'd prop name like `user={users}`. 2. **Data hasn't loaded yet** — the parent fetches data asynchronously and its state starts as `undefined`: ```jsx const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // undefined until fetch resolves! return <UserList users={users} />; ``` 3. **API response shape mismatch** — the array is nested, e.g., you need `response.data.users` inst…
31.3s1639 output tokens

Grok 4.7

The error happens because `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so calling `.map` on it fails. That usually means the parent rendered `<UserList />` (or `<UserList users={undefined} />`) before data was loaded, or the prop name doesn’t match. **Fix it in the component** so it tolerates a missing list: ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` Or guard the call: ```jsx function UserList({ users }) { return ( <ul> {(users ?? []).map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` **Also check the parent** so you pass an array once data exists: `…
12.8s393 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

GLM 5.3 Flash

Solid foundation — you're already passing an explicit `timeout` and implementing retries, which many people skip. Here's a breakdown by category: ## Correctness & robustness (most important) - **Bare `except:`** catches *everything*, including `KeyboardInterrupt` and `SystemExit`, and silently discards the error. Catch specific exceptions: `requests.RequestException` for network issues, `ValueError` for invalid JSON. - **Retrying non-retryable failures**: a 401/403/404 will never succeed on retry, so you're sleeping 6 seconds for nothing. Only retry transient errors (5xx, 429, timeouts/connection errors). - **`item["active"]` raises `KeyError`** on malformed data. Use `item.get("active")`…
116.1s6185 output tokens

Grok 4.7

## Review The function works for the happy path, but it hides failures, retries the wrong errors, and is harder to read and debug than it needs to be. ### Issues 1. **Imports inside the function** — move them to module level unless you have a strong reason (circular imports, optional dependency). 2. **Bare `except`** — swallows `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, and programming bugs. Catch specific exceptions. 3. **Retries non-retryable failures** — 4xx (except maybe 429) will not succeed on retry. Network errors and 5xx are the usual candidates. 4. **Sleeps after the last attempt** — wastes up to 2 seconds before returning `[]`. 5. **Unused loop variable** and vague names (`r`, `i`). 6.…
22.3s1525 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Grok 4.7?
Per 1M output tokens, GLM 5.3 Flash is ¥89.35 and Grok 4.7 is ¥828.6 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so GLM 5.3 Flash is cheaper.
How do the context windows of GLM 5.3 Flash and Grok 4.7 compare?
GLM 5.3 Flash takes 1,310,720 tokens; Grok 4.7 takes 500,000.
Can I use GLM 5.3 Flash and Grok 4.7 with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "glm-5.3-flash" or "grok-4.7" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call GLM 5.3 Flash and Grok 4.7 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with GLM 5.3 Flash

More comparisons with Grok 4.7