Model comparison

GLM 5.2 vs Muse Spark 1.2

Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)

GLM 5.2 (Z.ai) and Muse Spark 1.2 (Meta), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

z-ai logoGLM 5.2meta logoMuse Spark 1.2
ProviderZ.aiMeta
Input (per 1M tokens)¥250.18¥219.9
Output (per 1M tokens)¥786.28¥747.65
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥643¥594
Context window1,048,576 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Release date6/16/20268/5/2026
Input modalitiestexttext, image, video, file, audio
Arena · overall#33 · ELO 1,472#4 · ELO 1,498
Arena · Japanese#26 · ELO 1,458Unranked
Arena · coding#48 · ELO 1,508#7 · ELO 1,533

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, Muse Spark 1.2: ¥747.65 per 1M output tokens, 5% less than GLM 5.2.
  • On the Overall arena board, Muse Spark 1.2 ranks higher (#4; GLM 5.2 is #33).
  • On the Coding arena board, Muse Spark 1.2 ranks higher (#7; GLM 5.2 is #48).
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

GLM 5.2

To count the number of 'r's in the word 'strawberry', let's look at the word letter by letter: 1. **s** - no 'r' 2. **t** - no 'r' 3. **r** - this is the 1st 'r' 4. **a** - no 'r' 5. **w** - no 'r' 6. **b** - no 'r' 7. **e** - no 'r' 8. **r** - this is the 2nd 'r' 9. **r** - this is the 3rd 'r' 10. **y** - no 'r' Total count: 3 There are **3** 'r's in the word 'strawberry'.
2.6s439 output tokens

Muse Spark 1.2

There are **3** 'r's in "strawberry". Here is my reasoning step by step: 1. Write out the word and its spelling: **s-t-r-a-w-b-e-r-r-y** 2. Go through each letter one by one and check if it is an 'r': * 1. s - not an 'r' -> count = 0 * 2. t - not an 'r' -> count = 0 * 3. **r** - yes, it's an 'r' -> count = 1 * 4. a - not an 'r' -> count = 1 * 5. w - not an 'r' -> count = 1 * 6. b - not an 'r' -> count = 1 * 7. e - not an 'r' -> count = 1 * 8. **r** - yes, it's an 'r' -> count = 2 * 9. **r** - yes, it's an 'r' -> count = 3 * 10. y - not an 'r' -> count = 3 3. Final total = **3**.
13.3s1123 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

GLM 5.2

The error `TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')` happens because the `users` prop being passed to your `UserList` component is currently `undefined`. When JavaScript tries to call `.map()` on `undefined`, it throws this error. Here are the best ways to fix this: ### Fix 1: Provide a default value (Recommended) You can provide a default empty array `[]` when destructuring the props. This ensures that even if `users` is not passed down, the `.map()` function will still have an array to iterate over (resulting in an empty list rather than a crash). ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</…
8.3s1006 output tokens

Muse Spark 1.2

This error means `users` is `undefined` when the component tries to render. You are calling `.map()` on `users` at line 12, but `.map()` only exists on arrays. If `users` is `undefined` or `null`, JavaScript throws: `Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')`. This usually happens for 2 reasons: 1. You didn't pass the `users` prop to the component: `<UserList />` 2. Your data is async and `users` is `undefined` on the first render. For example: `const [users, setUsers] = useState()` without an initial value, and the data hasn't been fetched yet. ### Fix it You need to guarantee `users` is always an array before you call `.map()`. #### 1. Best Fix: Give it a default value U…
7.6s1142 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

GLM 5.2

Here is a review of your Python function, broken down by readability, performance, and best practices, followed by a refactored version of the code. ### 1. Best Practices * **Move imports to the top:** Importing modules inside a function is generally discouraged. While Python caches imports, putting `import requests` and `import time` at the top of your file is the standard convention and improves readability. * **Avoid bare `except:` blocks:** Using a bare `except:` catches everything, including `KeyboardInterrupt` and `SystemExit`. This makes it hard to interrupt your program if it gets stuck in a loop. You should catch specific exceptions, such as `requests.exceptions.RequestException` (…
10.9s2061 output tokens

Muse Spark 1.2

Here is a review of your function with a refactored, production-ready version: ### Issues in the Current Version #### 1. Readability 1. **Generic name:** `get_data` tells nothing about what it does. `get_active_items` is better. 2. **Imports inside function:** `import requests, time` should be at the top of the file. It's slower and violates PEP 8. 3. **Magic numbers:** `200`, `10`, `2` have no context. 4. **Verbose loop:** Manual `for` loop + `append` can be replaced with a list comprehension. 5. **No documentation/typing:** No docstring, no type hints, so callers don't know what it expects or returns. 6. **`== True` is redundant:** `if item["active"] == True:` should be `if item["a…
11.8s2278 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.2 or Muse Spark 1.2?
Per 1M output tokens, GLM 5.2 is ¥786.28 and Muse Spark 1.2 is ¥747.65 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so Muse Spark 1.2 is cheaper.
How do the context windows of GLM 5.2 and Muse Spark 1.2 compare?
GLM 5.2 takes 1,048,576 tokens; Muse Spark 1.2 takes 1,048,576.
Which ranks higher, GLM 5.2 or Muse Spark 1.2?
Muse Spark 1.2 ranks higher on the public arena (GLM 5.2 #26, Muse Spark 1.2 #4). Ranks move as the leaderboard updates.
Can I use GLM 5.2 and Muse Spark 1.2 with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "glm-5.2" or "muse-spark-1.2" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call GLM 5.2 and Muse Spark 1.2 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with GLM 5.2

More comparisons with Muse Spark 1.2