Model comparison

GLM 5.2 vs GPT-6.1 Sol

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

GLM 5.2 (Z.ai) and GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

z-ai logoGLM 5.2openai logoGPT-6.1 Sol
ProviderZ.aiOpenAI
Input (per 1M tokens)¥235.2¥357.4
Output (per 1M tokens)¥739.2¥1,787
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥605¥1,251
Context window1,048,576 tokens1,050,000 tokens
Release date6/16/20269/29/2026
Input modalitiestextfile, image, text
Throughput (p50)——
Arena · overall#31 · ELO 1,476Unranked
Arena · Japanese#32 · ELO 1,456Unranked
Arena · coding#52 · ELO 1,512Unranked

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax.

Rankings: LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), CC BY 4.0, snapshot 2026-09-25; category names mapped and ratings rounded by FastMetal.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, GLM 5.2: ¥739.2 per 1M output tokens, 59% less than GPT-6.1 Sol.
  • For long documents, GPT-6.1 Sol: a 1,050,000-token context window against 1,048,576 for GLM 5.2.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

GLM 5.2

To count the number of 'r's in the word 'strawberry', let's look at the word letter by letter: 1. **s** - no 'r' 2. **t** - no 'r' 3. **r** - this is the 1st 'r' 4. **a** - no 'r' 5. **w** - no 'r' 6. **b** - no 'r' 7. **e** - no 'r' 8. **r** - this is the 2nd 'r' 9. **r** - this is the 3rd 'r' 10. **y** - no 'r' Total count: 3 There are **3** 'r's in the word 'strawberry'.
2.6s439 output tokens

GPT-6.1 Sol

“strawberry” is spelled **s-t-r-a-w-b-e-r-r-y**. The letter **r** appears at positions **3, 8, and 9**. So, there are **3 r’s** in “strawberry.”
2.8s88 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

GLM 5.2

The error `TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')` happens because the `users` prop being passed to your `UserList` component is currently `undefined`. When JavaScript tries to call `.map()` on `undefined`, it throws this error. Here are the best ways to fix this: ### Fix 1: Provide a default value (Recommended) You can provide a default empty array `[]` when destructuring the props. This ensures that even if `users` is not passed down, the `.map()` function will still have an array to iterate over (resulting in an empty list rather than a crash). ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</…
8.3s1006 output tokens

GPT-6.1 Sol

The error means **`users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders**. Calling `.map()` on `undefined` throws this error. This commonly happens when the parent doesn’t pass the `users` prop, or when data hasn’t finished loading yet. ### Fix: provide a default empty array ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => ( <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li> ))} </ul> ); } ``` This renders an empty list if `users` is omitted or `undefined`. It does **not** handle `null`. ### Check the parent component too Make sure it passes an array: ```jsx <UserList users={users} /> ``` If you’re fetching users asynchronously, initialize the stat…
5.8s306 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

GLM 5.2

Here is a review of your Python function, broken down by readability, performance, and best practices, followed by a refactored version of the code. ### 1. Best Practices * **Move imports to the top:** Importing modules inside a function is generally discouraged. While Python caches imports, putting `import requests` and `import time` at the top of your file is the standard convention and improves readability. * **Avoid bare `except:` blocks:** Using a bare `except:` catches everything, including `KeyboardInterrupt` and `SystemExit`. This makes it hard to interrupt your program if it gets stuck in a loop. You should catch specific exceptions, such as `requests.exceptions.RequestException` (…
10.9s2061 output tokens

GPT-6.1 Sol

The function is short, but its main weakness is that it hides failures: a network error, invalid JSON, and a genuinely empty result all return `[]`. ### Suggested improvements - **Move imports to module scope.** This is conventional and makes dependencies visible. Repeated imports are cached, so the performance benefit is minor. - **Avoid bare `except:`.** It catches everything, including `KeyboardInterrupt` and `SystemExit`, and can hide programming errors. - **Handle HTTP errors explicitly.** `raise_for_status()` provides useful exceptions. Retry transient failures such as timeouts, connection errors, HTTP 429, and HTTP 5xx—not permanent errors such as HTTP 404. - **Don’t sleep after the…
19.0s1094 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.2 or GPT-6.1 Sol?
Per 1M output tokens, GLM 5.2 is ¥739.2 and GPT-6.1 Sol is ¥1,787 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so GLM 5.2 is cheaper.
How do the context windows of GLM 5.2 and GPT-6.1 Sol compare?
GLM 5.2 takes 1,048,576 tokens; GPT-6.1 Sol takes 1,050,000.
Can I use GLM 5.2 and GPT-6.1 Sol with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "glm-5.2" or "gpt-6.1-sol" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call GLM 5.2 and GPT-6.1 Sol from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with GLM 5.2

More comparisons with GPT-6.1 Sol