Fugu Max vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)
Fugu Max (Sakana AI) and MiMo-V2.6-Flash (Xiaomi), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.
Specs and pricing
| Fugu Max | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Sakana AI | Xiaomi |
| Input (per 1M tokens) | ¥357.4 | ¥25.02 |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | ¥1,072.2 | ¥50.04 |
| Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls) | ¥894 | ¥50 |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Release date | 9/11/2026 | 9/21/2026 |
| Input modalities | text, image, file | text, image, video, audio |
| Throughput (p50) | — | — |
| Arena · overall | Unranked | Unranked |
| Arena · Japanese | Unranked | Unranked |
| Arena · coding | Unranked | Unranked |
Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.
Which should you pick?
- On price, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: ¥50.04 per 1M output tokens, 95% less than Fugu Max.
- For long documents, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: a 1,048,576-token context window against 1,000,000 for Fugu Max.
- If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.
Real answers to the same prompts
Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.
Fugu Max
The word **“strawberry”** has **3** letters **“r”**.
Step by step:
1. Write the word: **s t r a w b e r r y**
2. Check each letter:
- s — no
- t — no
- **r** — yes, 1st
- a — no
- w — no
- b — no
- e — no
- **r** — yes, 2nd
- **r** — yes, 3rd
- y — no
So, the total number of **‘r’s** in **“strawberry”** is **3**.
3.7s261 output tokens
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
## Counting the 'r's in 'strawberry'
**Step 1: Write out each letter of the word individually:**
`s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y`
**Step 2: Go through each letter one by one and check if it's an 'r':**
| Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? | Running Count |
|----------|--------|------------|---------------|
| 1 | s | ❌ | 0 |
| 2 | t | ❌ | 0 |
| 3 | **r** | ✅ | **1** |
| 4 | a | ❌ | 1 |
| 5 | w | ❌ | 1 |
| 6 | b | ❌ | 1 |
| 7 | e | ❌ | 1 |
| 8 | **r** | ✅ | **2** |
| 9 | **r** | ✅ | **3** |
| 10 | y | ❌ | 3 |
**Answer: There are 3 'r's in 'strawberry'.** 🍓
The first 'r' appears at position 3 (after "st"), and the remaining two are the double 'rr' near the end of the word.
6.5s379 output tokens
Debug This Error
I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…
Fugu Max
The error means `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so `users.map(...)` throws:
```js
function UserList({ users }) {
// if `users` is not passed, this is undefined
return (
<ul>
{users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)}
</ul>
);
}
```
Common causes:
1. Parent renders `<UserList />` without the `users` prop.
2. State is initialized as `undefined`:
```js
const [users, setUsers] = useState();
```
3. Async data hasn’t loaded yet, but the component already renders.
4. The API returned something unexpected, e.g. `undefined`, an object, or an error response.
## Fixes
### 1. Default the prop to an empty array
```jsx
function UserList({ use…
10.6s1293 output tokens
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
## Cause of the Error
The error occurs because the `users` prop is `undefined` when the component first renders. When you try to call `.map()` on `undefined`, it throws:
```
TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')
```
This typically happens when:
1. The **parent component** hasn't passed `users` yet (e.g., data is still loading from an API)
2. The prop name **doesn't match** between parent and child
3. The prop is **intentionally optional** but used unconditionally
## Fixes
### 1. Default parameter value (simplest fix)
Set a default value for `users` so it's always an array:
```js
function UserList({ users = [] }) {
return (
<ul>
{users.map(user =>…
7.6s547 output tokens
Code Review
Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…
Fugu Max
Here’s a review with concrete improvements.
## Main issues
1. **Bare `except:`**
- Catches everything, including `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, and programming errors.
- Catch `requests.RequestException` instead, plus `ValueError` for JSON parsing if needed.
2. **Retries everything, including non-retryable errors**
- A `404` or `401` will be retried even though retrying will not help.
- Retry only transient failures: network errors, `429`, and `5xx`.
3. **Fixed 2-second sleep**
- No exponential backoff. Repeated retries can hammer the server.
- Use exponential backoff, optionally with jitter.
4. **Silent failure**
- Returning `[]` after all retries makes it hard…
24.7s3795 output tokens
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
# Code Review: `get_data`
## Issues Identified
| Category | Issue |
|----------|-------|
| **Readability** | Imports inside function, vague names (`i`, `r`), no docstring/type hints |
| **Performance** | Manual loop instead of list comprehension, no `requests.Session` (no connection reuse) |
| **Best Practices** | Bare `except`, `== True`, silent failures, no backoff, no error propagation |
---
## Improved Version
```python
import time
import logging
import requests
from typing import Optional
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
def get_data(
url: str,
retries: int = 3,
timeout: float = 10,
backoff_factor: float = 2.0,
) -> Optional[list[dict]]:
"""
Fetch dat…
18.9s1208 output tokens
Frequently asked questions
- Which is cheaper, Fugu Max or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
- Per 1M output tokens, Fugu Max is ¥1,072.2 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is ¥50.04 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper.
- How do the context windows of Fugu Max and MiMo-V2.6-Flash compare?
- Fugu Max takes 1,000,000 tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Flash takes 1,048,576.
- Can I use Fugu Max and MiMo-V2.6-Flash with the same API key?
- Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "fugu-max" or "mimo-v2.6-flash" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.
Try both on one API key
Create an account and add credit to call Fugu Max and MiMo-V2.6-Flash from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.