Fugu Max vs Grok 4.5
Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)
Fugu Max (Sakana AI) and Grok 4.5 (xAI), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.
Specs and pricing
| Fugu Max |  Grok 4.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Sakana AI | xAI |
| Input (per 1M tokens) | ¥357.4 | ¥357.4 |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | ¥1,072.2 | ¥1,072.2 |
| Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls) | ¥894 | ¥894 |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 500,000 tokens |
| Release date | 9/11/2026 | 7/8/2026 |
| Input modalities | text, image, file | text, image, file |
| Throughput (p50) | — | — |
| Arena · overall | Unranked | #42 · ELO 1,468 |
| Arena · Japanese | Unranked | #37 · ELO 1,443 |
| Arena · coding | Unranked | #33 · ELO 1,518 |
Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.
Which should you pick?
- Output pricing is identical (¥1,072.2 per 1M tokens).
- For long documents, Fugu Max: a 1,000,000-token context window against 500,000 for Grok 4.5.
- If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.
Real answers to the same prompts
Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.
Fugu Max
The word **“strawberry”** has **3** letters **“r”**.
Step by step:
1. Write the word: **s t r a w b e r r y**
2. Check each letter:
- s — no
- t — no
- **r** — yes, 1st
- a — no
- w — no
- b — no
- e — no
- **r** — yes, 2nd
- **r** — yes, 3rd
- y — no
So, the total number of **‘r’s** in **“strawberry”** is **3**.
3.7s261 output tokens
Grok 4.5
The word "strawberry" is spelled as follows:
**s-t-r-a-w-b-e-r-r-y**
- Position 1: **s**
- Position 2: **t**
- Position 3: **r** ← (1st "r")
- Position 4: **a**
- Position 5: **w**
- Position 6: **b**
- Position 7: **e**
- Position 8: **r** ← (2nd "r")
- Position 9: **r** ← (3rd "r")
- Position 10: **y**
There are **3** occurrences of the letter "r".
6.5s350 output tokens
Debug This Error
I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…
Fugu Max
The error means `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so `users.map(...)` throws:
```js
function UserList({ users }) {
// if `users` is not passed, this is undefined
return (
<ul>
{users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)}
</ul>
);
}
```
Common causes:
1. Parent renders `<UserList />` without the `users` prop.
2. State is initialized as `undefined`:
```js
const [users, setUsers] = useState();
```
3. Async data hasn’t loaded yet, but the component already renders.
4. The API returned something unexpected, e.g. `undefined`, an object, or an error response.
## Fixes
### 1. Default the prop to an empty array
```jsx
function UserList({ use…
10.6s1293 output tokens
Grok 4.5
The error occurs because `users` is `undefined` when the component renders, so calling `.map()` on it fails.
This commonly happens when:
- The parent component doesn’t pass a `users` prop at all
- The data is loaded asynchronously and is still `undefined` on the first render
- The prop is accidentally set to `undefined`/`null` instead of an array
### Fixes
**1. Default to an empty array (simplest)**
```js
function UserList({ users = [] }) {
return (
<ul>
{users.map(user => (
<li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>
))}
</ul>
);
}
```
**2. Optional chaining (also fine)**
```js
function UserList({ users }) {
return (
<ul>
{users?.map(user => (…
7.9s507 output tokens
Code Review
Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…
Fugu Max
Here’s a review with concrete improvements.
## Main issues
1. **Bare `except:`**
- Catches everything, including `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, and programming errors.
- Catch `requests.RequestException` instead, plus `ValueError` for JSON parsing if needed.
2. **Retries everything, including non-retryable errors**
- A `404` or `401` will be retried even though retrying will not help.
- Retry only transient failures: network errors, `429`, and `5xx`.
3. **Fixed 2-second sleep**
- No exponential backoff. Repeated retries can hammer the server.
- Use exponential backoff, optionally with jitter.
4. **Silent failure**
- Returning `[]` after all retries makes it hard…
24.7s3795 output tokens
Grok 4.5
## Code Review: `get_data`
### Issues
| Area | Problem |
|------|---------|
| **Imports** | `requests` / `time` inside the function — re-imported on every call; belong at module level |
| **Exceptions** | Bare `except:` swallows `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, and hides bugs |
| **Boolean check** | `item["active"] == True` is unidiomatic; truthiness is enough |
| **Loop** | Manual `for` + `append` can be a list comprehension |
| **Retries** | Sleeps on non-200 but never logs or distinguishes failure modes; unused loop variable `i` |
| **Robustness** | No guard for non-list JSON, missing keys (`KeyError`), or invalid JSON |
| **API** | Magic numbers (`timeout=10`, `sleep=2`); no docstrin…
25.3s1363 output tokens
Frequently asked questions
- Which is cheaper, Fugu Max or Grok 4.5?
- Both are ¥1,072.2 per 1M output tokens on FastMetal (yen, before tax).
- How do the context windows of Fugu Max and Grok 4.5 compare?
- Fugu Max takes 1,000,000 tokens; Grok 4.5 takes 500,000.
- Can I use Fugu Max and Grok 4.5 with the same API key?
- Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "fugu-max" or "grok-4.5" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.
Try both on one API key
Create an account and add credit to call Fugu Max and Grok 4.5 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.