Model comparison

Fugu Max vs GLM 5.2

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

Fugu Max (Sakana AI) and GLM 5.2 (Z.ai), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

Fugu Maxz-ai logoGLM 5.2
ProviderSakana AIZ.ai
Input (per 1M tokens)¥357.4¥235.2
Output (per 1M tokens)¥1,072.2¥739.2
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥894¥605
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Release date9/11/20266/16/2026
Input modalitiestext, image, filetext
Throughput (p50)
Arena · overallUnranked#38 · ELO 1,472
Arena · JapaneseUnranked#28 · ELO 1,452
Arena · codingUnranked#48 · ELO 1,510

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, GLM 5.2: ¥739.2 per 1M output tokens, 31% less than Fugu Max.
  • For long documents, GLM 5.2: a 1,048,576-token context window against 1,000,000 for Fugu Max.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Fugu Max

The word **“strawberry”** has **3** letters **“r”**. Step by step: 1. Write the word: **s t r a w b e r r y** 2. Check each letter: - s — no - t — no - **r** — yes, 1st - a — no - w — no - b — no - e — no - **r** — yes, 2nd - **r** — yes, 3rd - y — no So, the total number of **‘r’s** in **“strawberry”** is **3**.
3.7s261 output tokens

GLM 5.2

To count the number of 'r's in the word 'strawberry', let's look at the word letter by letter: 1. **s** - no 'r' 2. **t** - no 'r' 3. **r** - this is the 1st 'r' 4. **a** - no 'r' 5. **w** - no 'r' 6. **b** - no 'r' 7. **e** - no 'r' 8. **r** - this is the 2nd 'r' 9. **r** - this is the 3rd 'r' 10. **y** - no 'r' Total count: 3 There are **3** 'r's in the word 'strawberry'.
2.6s439 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Fugu Max

The error means `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so `users.map(...)` throws: ```js function UserList({ users }) { // if `users` is not passed, this is undefined return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` Common causes: 1. Parent renders `<UserList />` without the `users` prop. 2. State is initialized as `undefined`: ```js const [users, setUsers] = useState(); ``` 3. Async data hasn’t loaded yet, but the component already renders. 4. The API returned something unexpected, e.g. `undefined`, an object, or an error response. ## Fixes ### 1. Default the prop to an empty array ```jsx function UserList({ use…
10.6s1293 output tokens

GLM 5.2

The error `TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')` happens because the `users` prop being passed to your `UserList` component is currently `undefined`. When JavaScript tries to call `.map()` on `undefined`, it throws this error. Here are the best ways to fix this: ### Fix 1: Provide a default value (Recommended) You can provide a default empty array `[]` when destructuring the props. This ensures that even if `users` is not passed down, the `.map()` function will still have an array to iterate over (resulting in an empty list rather than a crash). ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</…
8.3s1006 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Fugu Max

Here’s a review with concrete improvements. ## Main issues 1. **Bare `except:`** - Catches everything, including `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, and programming errors. - Catch `requests.RequestException` instead, plus `ValueError` for JSON parsing if needed. 2. **Retries everything, including non-retryable errors** - A `404` or `401` will be retried even though retrying will not help. - Retry only transient failures: network errors, `429`, and `5xx`. 3. **Fixed 2-second sleep** - No exponential backoff. Repeated retries can hammer the server. - Use exponential backoff, optionally with jitter. 4. **Silent failure** - Returning `[]` after all retries makes it hard…
24.7s3795 output tokens

GLM 5.2

Here is a review of your Python function, broken down by readability, performance, and best practices, followed by a refactored version of the code. ### 1. Best Practices * **Move imports to the top:** Importing modules inside a function is generally discouraged. While Python caches imports, putting `import requests` and `import time` at the top of your file is the standard convention and improves readability. * **Avoid bare `except:` blocks:** Using a bare `except:` catches everything, including `KeyboardInterrupt` and `SystemExit`. This makes it hard to interrupt your program if it gets stuck in a loop. You should catch specific exceptions, such as `requests.exceptions.RequestException` (…
10.9s2061 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Fugu Max or GLM 5.2?
Per 1M output tokens, Fugu Max is ¥1,072.2 and GLM 5.2 is ¥739.2 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so GLM 5.2 is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Fugu Max and GLM 5.2 compare?
Fugu Max takes 1,000,000 tokens; GLM 5.2 takes 1,048,576.
Can I use Fugu Max and GLM 5.2 with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "fugu-max" or "glm-5.2" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Fugu Max and GLM 5.2 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Fugu Max

More comparisons with GLM 5.2