Model comparison

Fugu Max vs GLM 5.1

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

Fugu Max (Sakana AI) and GLM 5.1 (Z.ai), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

Fugu Maxz-ai logoGLM 5.1
ProviderSakana AIZ.ai
Input (per 1M tokens)¥357.4¥250.18
Output (per 1M tokens)¥1,072.2¥786.28
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥894¥643
Context window1,000,000 tokens204,800 tokens
Release date9/11/20264/7/2026
Input modalitiestext, image, filetext
Throughput (p50)
Arena · overallUnranked#47 · ELO 1,466
Arena · JapaneseUnranked#46 · ELO 1,434
Arena · codingUnranked#45 · ELO 1,513

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, GLM 5.1: ¥786.28 per 1M output tokens, 27% less than Fugu Max.
  • For long documents, Fugu Max: a 1,000,000-token context window against 204,800 for GLM 5.1.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Fugu Max

The word **“strawberry”** has **3** letters **“r”**. Step by step: 1. Write the word: **s t r a w b e r r y** 2. Check each letter: - s — no - t — no - **r** — yes, 1st - a — no - w — no - b — no - e — no - **r** — yes, 2nd - **r** — yes, 3rd - y — no So, the total number of **‘r’s** in **“strawberry”** is **3**.
3.7s261 output tokens

GLM 5.1

There are **3** 'r's in the word "strawberry". Here is the step-by-step reasoning: 1. Let's break down the word "strawberry" letter by letter: s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y 2. Now, let's check each letter one by one to see if it is an 'r': - **s**: not an 'r' - **t**: not an 'r' - **r**: this is the 1st 'r' - **a**: not an 'r' - **w**: not an 'r' - **b**: not an 'r' - **e**: not an 'r' - **r**: this is the 2nd 'r' - **r**: this is the 3rd 'r' - **y**: not an 'r' 3. Counting them up, there are three 'r's in total (in the 3rd, 8th, and 9th positions).
7.3s565 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Fugu Max

The error means `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so `users.map(...)` throws: ```js function UserList({ users }) { // if `users` is not passed, this is undefined return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` Common causes: 1. Parent renders `<UserList />` without the `users` prop. 2. State is initialized as `undefined`: ```js const [users, setUsers] = useState(); ``` 3. Async data hasn’t loaded yet, but the component already renders. 4. The API returned something unexpected, e.g. `undefined`, an object, or an error response. ## Fixes ### 1. Default the prop to an empty array ```jsx function UserList({ use…
10.6s1293 output tokens

GLM 5.1

### What is causing the error? The error `TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')` means you are trying to call the `.map()` method on a variable that is `undefined`. In your code, the variable is `users`. When the `UserList` component renders, the `users` prop is `undefined`, so `undefined.map()` throws an error. ### Why is `users` undefined? This usually happens for one of two reasons: 1. **You forgot to pass the prop:** The parent component rendering `<UserList />` is not passing the `users` attribute (e.g., `<UserList />` instead of `<UserList users={myUsers} />`). 2. **Async Data Fetching:** You are fetching the users from an API. On the initial render, befor…
45.0s1680 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Fugu Max

Here’s a review with concrete improvements. ## Main issues 1. **Bare `except:`** - Catches everything, including `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, and programming errors. - Catch `requests.RequestException` instead, plus `ValueError` for JSON parsing if needed. 2. **Retries everything, including non-retryable errors** - A `404` or `401` will be retried even though retrying will not help. - Retry only transient failures: network errors, `429`, and `5xx`. 3. **Fixed 2-second sleep** - No exponential backoff. Repeated retries can hammer the server. - Use exponential backoff, optionally with jitter. 4. **Silent failure** - Returning `[]` after all retries makes it hard…
24.7s3795 output tokens

GLM 5.1

Here is a review of your function, broken down by areas for improvement, followed by a refactored version of the code. ### Key Areas for Improvement 1. **Imports Inside the Function:** Placing `import` statements inside a function is generally discouraged in Python. It slows down the function execution every time it is called, and it violates PEP 8 (the Python style guide). Imports should always be at the top of the module. 2. **Bare `except` Clause:** Using a bare `except:` catches *everything*, including `KeyboardInterrupt` and `SystemExit`, which makes it hard to terminate a hanging program. You should catch specific exceptions (like `requests.exceptions.RequestException`). 3. *…
70.3s2854 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Fugu Max or GLM 5.1?
Per 1M output tokens, Fugu Max is ¥1,072.2 and GLM 5.1 is ¥786.28 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so GLM 5.1 is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Fugu Max and GLM 5.1 compare?
Fugu Max takes 1,000,000 tokens; GLM 5.1 takes 204,800.
Can I use Fugu Max and GLM 5.1 with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "fugu-max" or "glm-5.1" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Fugu Max and GLM 5.1 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Fugu Max

More comparisons with GLM 5.1