Model comparison

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GLM 5.1

Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)

Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic) and GLM 5.1 (Z.ai), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

anthropic logoClaude Haiku 4.5z-ai logoGLM 5.1
ProviderAnthropicZ.ai
Input (per 1M tokens)¥184.8¥250.18
Output (per 1M tokens)¥924¥786.28
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥647¥643
Context window200,000 tokens204,800 tokens
Release date10/15/20254/7/2026
Input modalitiesimage, texttext
Arena · overall#129 · ELO 1,413#41 · ELO 1,466
Arena · Japanese#112 · ELO 1,357#49 · ELO 1,430
Arena · coding#95 · ELO 1,480#36 · ELO 1,514

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, GLM 5.1: ¥786.28 per 1M output tokens, 15% less than Claude Haiku 4.5.
  • On the Overall arena board, GLM 5.1 ranks higher (#41; Claude Haiku 4.5 is #129).
  • On the Japanese arena board, GLM 5.1 ranks higher (#49; Claude Haiku 4.5 is #112).
  • On the Coding arena board, GLM 5.1 ranks higher (#36; Claude Haiku 4.5 is #95).
  • For long documents, GLM 5.1: a 204,800-token context window against 200,000 for Claude Haiku 4.5.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Claude Haiku 4.5

# Counting the 'r's in "strawberry" Let me go through each letter in the word "strawberry": 1. **s** - not an 'r' 2. **t** - not an 'r' 3. **r** - this is an 'r' ✓ (1st) 4. **a** - not an 'r' 5. **w** - not an 'r' 6. **b** - not an 'r' 7. **e** - not an 'r' 8. **r** - this is an 'r' ✓ (2nd) 9. **r** - this is an 'r' ✓ (3rd) 10. **y** - not an 'r' **Answer: There are 3 'r's in "strawberry"** The 'r's appear in positions 3, 8, and 9 of the word.
4.1s228 output tokens

GLM 5.1

There are **3** 'r's in the word "strawberry". Here is the step-by-step reasoning: 1. Let's break down the word "strawberry" letter by letter: s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y 2. Now, let's check each letter one by one to see if it is an 'r': - **s**: not an 'r' - **t**: not an 'r' - **r**: this is the 1st 'r' - **a**: not an 'r' - **w**: not an 'r' - **b**: not an 'r' - **e**: not an 'r' - **r**: this is the 2nd 'r' - **r**: this is the 3rd 'r' - **y**: not an 'r' 3. Counting them up, there are three 'r's in total (in the 3rd, 8th, and 9th positions).
7.3s565 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Claude Haiku 4.5

# TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') This error occurs because `users` is `undefined` when the component renders. You're trying to call `.map()` on `undefined`, which doesn't have that method. ## Common Causes 1. **Parent component didn't pass the `users` prop** 2. **Async data hasn't loaded yet** 3. **Props passed incorrectly** ## Solutions ### 1. **Provide a Default Value** (Recommended) ```javascript function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` ### 2. **Add a Conditional Check** ```javascript function UserList({ users }) { if (!users) { return <p>No users a…
3.9s671 output tokens

GLM 5.1

### What is causing the error? The error `TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')` means you are trying to call the `.map()` method on a variable that is `undefined`. In your code, the variable is `users`. When the `UserList` component renders, the `users` prop is `undefined`, so `undefined.map()` throws an error. ### Why is `users` undefined? This usually happens for one of two reasons: 1. **You forgot to pass the prop:** The parent component rendering `<UserList />` is not passing the `users` attribute (e.g., `<UserList />` instead of `<UserList users={myUsers} />`). 2. **Async Data Fetching:** You are fetching the users from an API. On the initial render, befor…
45.0s1680 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Claude Haiku 4.5

# Code Review and Improvements ## Issues Found 1. **Bare `except`** - Catches all exceptions, hiding bugs 2. **Imports inside function** - Should be at module level 3. **Redundant comparison** - `== True` is unnecessary 4. **No logging** - Hard to debug failures 5. **Magic numbers** - Hardcoded timeout and sleep values 6. **Inefficient retries** - Doesn't retry on 200 with parsing errors 7. **Poor variable names** - `r`, `i` are unclear 8. **No type hints** - Reduces code clarity ## Improved Version ```python import logging import requests import time from typing import Optional from requests.exceptions import RequestException logger = logging.getLogger(__name__) def get_data( url:…
5.7s988 output tokens

GLM 5.1

Here is a review of your function, broken down by areas for improvement, followed by a refactored version of the code. ### Key Areas for Improvement 1. **Imports Inside the Function:** Placing `import` statements inside a function is generally discouraged in Python. It slows down the function execution every time it is called, and it violates PEP 8 (the Python style guide). Imports should always be at the top of the module. 2. **Bare `except` Clause:** Using a bare `except:` catches *everything*, including `KeyboardInterrupt` and `SystemExit`, which makes it hard to terminate a hanging program. You should catch specific exceptions (like `requests.exceptions.RequestException`). 3. *…
70.3s2854 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or GLM 5.1?
Per 1M output tokens, Claude Haiku 4.5 is ¥924 and GLM 5.1 is ¥786.28 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so GLM 5.1 is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Claude Haiku 4.5 and GLM 5.1 compare?
Claude Haiku 4.5 takes 200,000 tokens; GLM 5.1 takes 204,800.
Which ranks higher, Claude Haiku 4.5 or GLM 5.1?
GLM 5.1 ranks higher on the public arena (Claude Haiku 4.5 #112, GLM 5.1 #49). Ranks move as the leaderboard updates.
Can I use Claude Haiku 4.5 and GLM 5.1 with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "anthropic-claude-haiku-4-5" or "glm-5.1" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Claude Haiku 4.5 and GLM 5.1 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Claude Haiku 4.5

More comparisons with GLM 5.1