Model comparison

Fugu Max vs GLM 4.7

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

Fugu Max (Sakana AI) and GLM 4.7 (Z.ai), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

Fugu Maxz-ai logoGLM 4.7
ProviderSakana AIZ.ai
Input (per 1M tokens)¥357.4¥107.22
Output (per 1M tokens)¥1,072.2¥393.14
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥894¥304
Context window1,000,000 tokens202,752 tokens
Release date9/11/202612/22/2025
Input modalitiestext, image, filetext
Throughput (p50)
Arena · overallUnranked#83 · ELO 1,442
Arena · JapaneseUnrankedUnranked
Arena · codingUnranked#91 · ELO 1,485

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, GLM 4.7: ¥393.14 per 1M output tokens, 63% less than Fugu Max.
  • For long documents, Fugu Max: a 1,000,000-token context window against 202,752 for GLM 4.7.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Fugu Max

The word **“strawberry”** has **3** letters **“r”**. Step by step: 1. Write the word: **s t r a w b e r r y** 2. Check each letter: - s — no - t — no - **r** — yes, 1st - a — no - w — no - b — no - e — no - **r** — yes, 2nd - **r** — yes, 3rd - y — no So, the total number of **‘r’s** in **“strawberry”** is **3**.
3.7s261 output tokens

GLM 4.7

There are **3** "r"s in "strawberry". Here is the step-by-step reasoning: 1. **Break down the word into individual letters:** s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y 2. **Identify the position of each 'r':** * The 3rd letter is **r**. * The 8th letter is **r**. * The 9th letter is **r**. 3. **Count the total occurrences:** 1 + 1 + 1 = 3.
23.3s685 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Fugu Max

The error means `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so `users.map(...)` throws: ```js function UserList({ users }) { // if `users` is not passed, this is undefined return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` Common causes: 1. Parent renders `<UserList />` without the `users` prop. 2. State is initialized as `undefined`: ```js const [users, setUsers] = useState(); ``` 3. Async data hasn’t loaded yet, but the component already renders. 4. The API returned something unexpected, e.g. `undefined`, an object, or an error response. ## Fixes ### 1. Default the prop to an empty array ```jsx function UserList({ use…
10.6s1293 output tokens

GLM 4.7

### The Cause The error `TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')` means that the variable `users` is `undefined` when the component tries to render. In React, this typically happens for one of two reasons: 1. The **Parent Component** is not passing the `users` prop to `UserList`. 2. The **Parent Component** passed the prop, but the data hasn't loaded yet (e.g., an API call is still pending), so the value is initially `undefined`. Since `undefined` does not have a `.map()` method, the application crashes. --- ### How to Fix It There are two main ways to fix this: handling it inside the `UserList` component (defensive coding) or fixing the parent component passing…
42.0s1384 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Fugu Max

Here’s a review with concrete improvements. ## Main issues 1. **Bare `except:`** - Catches everything, including `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, and programming errors. - Catch `requests.RequestException` instead, plus `ValueError` for JSON parsing if needed. 2. **Retries everything, including non-retryable errors** - A `404` or `401` will be retried even though retrying will not help. - Retry only transient failures: network errors, `429`, and `5xx`. 3. **Fixed 2-second sleep** - No exponential backoff. Repeated retries can hammer the server. - Use exponential backoff, optionally with jitter. 4. **Silent failure** - Returning `[]` after all retries makes it hard…
24.7s3795 output tokens

GLM 4.7

Here is a review of your function with suggestions for improving readability, performance, and best practices, followed by a refactored version of the code. ### Code Review 1. **Import Placement:** You import `requests` and `time` inside the function. Imports should generally be placed at the top of the file so they are loaded once when the module starts, rather than every time the function is called. 2. **Bare `except:`:** You used `except:` without specifying an exception type. This is dangerous because it catches *everything*, including `KeyboardInterrupt` (Ctrl+C) and `SystemExit`, preventing your program from terminating when needed. You should specifically catch `requests.exception…
24.5s2951 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Fugu Max or GLM 4.7?
Per 1M output tokens, Fugu Max is ¥1,072.2 and GLM 4.7 is ¥393.14 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so GLM 4.7 is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Fugu Max and GLM 4.7 compare?
Fugu Max takes 1,000,000 tokens; GLM 4.7 takes 202,752.
Can I use Fugu Max and GLM 4.7 with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "fugu-max" or "glm-4.7" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Fugu Max and GLM 4.7 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Fugu Max

More comparisons with GLM 4.7