Model comparison

Fugu Max vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

Fugu Max (Sakana AI) and Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

Fugu Maxgoogle logoGemini 3.7 Flash
ProviderSakana AIGoogle
Input (per 1M tokens)¥357.4¥134.03
Output (per 1M tokens)¥1,072.2¥670.13
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥894¥469
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Release date9/11/20268/13/2026
Input modalitiestext, image, filetext, image, video, file, audio
Throughput (p50)
Arena · overallUnranked#12 · ELO 1,490
Arena · JapaneseUnrankedUnranked
Arena · codingUnranked#26 · ELO 1,521

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, Gemini 3.7 Flash: ¥670.13 per 1M output tokens, 37% less than Fugu Max.
  • For long documents, Gemini 3.7 Flash: a 1,048,576-token context window against 1,000,000 for Fugu Max.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Fugu Max

The word **“strawberry”** has **3** letters **“r”**. Step by step: 1. Write the word: **s t r a w b e r r y** 2. Check each letter: - s — no - t — no - **r** — yes, 1st - a — no - w — no - b — no - e — no - **r** — yes, 2nd - **r** — yes, 3rd - y — no So, the total number of **‘r’s** in **“strawberry”** is **3**.
3.7s261 output tokens

Gemini 3.7 Flash

There are **3** 'r's in the word "strawberry". ### Step-by-step reasoning: 1. **Break down the word into individual letters:** * 1st letter: **s** * 2nd letter: **t** * 3rd letter: **r** *(1st 'r')* * 4th letter: **a** * 5th letter: **w** * 6th letter: **b** * 7th letter: **e** * 8th letter: **r** *(2nd 'r')* * 9th letter: **r** *(3rd 'r')* * 10th letter: **y** 2. **Identify the positions of 'r':** * The 3rd letter is an **r** (in "st**r**aw"). * The 8th letter is an **r** (in "be**r**ry"). * The 9th letter is an **r** (in "ber**r**y"). 3. **Total count:** 1 + 1 + 1 = **3**.
4.5s530 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Fugu Max

The error means `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so `users.map(...)` throws: ```js function UserList({ users }) { // if `users` is not passed, this is undefined return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` Common causes: 1. Parent renders `<UserList />` without the `users` prop. 2. State is initialized as `undefined`: ```js const [users, setUsers] = useState(); ``` 3. Async data hasn’t loaded yet, but the component already renders. 4. The API returned something unexpected, e.g. `undefined`, an object, or an error response. ## Fixes ### 1. Default the prop to an empty array ```jsx function UserList({ use…
10.6s1293 output tokens

Gemini 3.7 Flash

### Why This Error Happens This error occurs because the `users` prop is `undefined` when the component renders. Since `map` is an Array method, calling `undefined.map()` causes JavaScript to throw a `TypeError`. This usually happens when: 1. Data is being fetched asynchronously (e.g., via `fetch` or `axios`), and the component renders **before** the data has arrived. 2. The parent component forgot to pass the `users` prop (`<UserList />`). 3. The initial state in the parent component was initialized as `undefined` (e.g., `const [users, setUsers] = useState()`). --- ### How to Fix It Here are the best ways to fix it, depending on your use case: #### Solution 1: Default Parameter (Recom…
9.9s1355 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Fugu Max

Here’s a review with concrete improvements. ## Main issues 1. **Bare `except:`** - Catches everything, including `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, and programming errors. - Catch `requests.RequestException` instead, plus `ValueError` for JSON parsing if needed. 2. **Retries everything, including non-retryable errors** - A `404` or `401` will be retried even though retrying will not help. - Retry only transient failures: network errors, `429`, and `5xx`. 3. **Fixed 2-second sleep** - No exponential backoff. Repeated retries can hammer the server. - Use exponential backoff, optionally with jitter. 4. **Silent failure** - Returning `[]` after all retries makes it hard…
24.7s3795 output tokens

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Here is a detailed review of your function, followed by refactored versions. --- ### Key Issues & Areas for Improvement 1. **Imports inside the function (PEP 8):** Imports should be placed at the top of the file, not inside a function, to avoid repeated import overhead and improve readability. 2. **Bare `except:` clause (Anti-pattern):** Catching everything with `except:` intercepts `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, and memory errors, making debugging difficult. Catch specific exceptions like `requests.RequestException` and `ValueError` (for JSON decoding). 3. **Retrying on non-retryable errors:** A status code like `404 Not Found` or `401 Unauthorized` will never succeed on a…
13.2s2117 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Fugu Max or Gemini 3.7 Flash?
Per 1M output tokens, Fugu Max is ¥1,072.2 and Gemini 3.7 Flash is ¥670.13 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so Gemini 3.7 Flash is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Fugu Max and Gemini 3.7 Flash compare?
Fugu Max takes 1,000,000 tokens; Gemini 3.7 Flash takes 1,048,576.
Can I use Fugu Max and Gemini 3.7 Flash with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "fugu-max" or "gemini-3.7-flash" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Fugu Max and Gemini 3.7 Flash from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Fugu Max

More comparisons with Gemini 3.7 Flash