Model comparison

Ember-1 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

Ember-1 (Fireworks) and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (Qwen), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

Ember-1qwen logoQwen3.8 2.4T A95B
ProviderFireworksQwen
Input (per 1M tokens)¥536.1¥351.83
Output (per 1M tokens)¥2,680.5¥1,055.5
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥1,876¥880
Context window1,048,576 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Release date9/24/20268/12/2026
Input modalitiestext, imagetext
Throughput (p50)——
Arena · overallUnrankedUnranked
Arena · JapaneseUnrankedUnranked
Arena · codingUnrankedUnranked

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: ¥1,055.5 per 1M output tokens, 61% less than Ember-1.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Ember-1

# Counting the 'r's in "strawberry" **Step 1: Write out the word letter by letter** s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y **Step 2: Examine each letter one at a time** | Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? | |----------|--------|------------| | 1 | s | No | | 2 | t | No | | 3 | r | ✅ Yes (1) | | 4 | a | No | | 5 | w | No | | 6 | b | No | | 7 | e | No | | 8 | r | ✅ Yes (2) | | 9 | r | ✅ Yes (3) | | 10 | y | No | **Step 3: Verify by splitting the word into parts** - "straw" → contains **1** r - "berry" → contains **2** r's - Total: 1 + 2 = **3** ## Answer The word "strawberry" contains **3** r's.
8.2s482 output tokens

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

To count the number of **“r”**s in **“strawberry”**, spell it out letter by letter: **s t r a w b e r r y** Now check each letter: 1. s — not r 2. t — not r 3. r — yes, count 1 4. a — not r 5. w — not r 6. b — not r 7. e — not r 8. r — yes, count 2 9. r — yes, count 3 10. y — not r So there are **3** “r”s in **strawberry**.
1.3s203 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Ember-1

## The Cause The error means `users` is `undefined` when the component renders, so calling `.map()` on it fails. The component itself is fine — the problem is that the `users` prop isn't being provided (or isn't ready yet). The most common reasons this happens: 1. **Async data hasn't loaded yet** — the parent fetches users from an API, and the component renders before the fetch completes: ```jsx const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // undefined initially! ``` 2. **The prop isn't passed or is misspelled** in the parent: ```jsx <UserList user={users} /> // typo: should be "users" ``` 3. **Wrong data shape** — e.g., passing the whole response object instead of `response…
18.2s960 output tokens

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

The error happens because `users` is `undefined` when React tries to render this line: ```js {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} ``` JavaScript cannot call `.map()` on `undefined`. In your component: ```js function UserList({ users }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` React expects `users` to be an array, but something is rendering `<UserList />` without providing a valid `users` prop. --- ## Common causes ### 1. The parent component is not passing `users` For example: ```js <UserList /> ``` Instead of: ```js <UserList users={users} /> ``` --- ### 2. The data has not loaded yet If `users…
10.9s1318 output tokens

Professional Email

Write a professional email to a client explaining that the project delivery will be delayed by two weeks due to unexpected technical challenges discovered during integration testing. The tone should be apologetic but con…

Ember-1

**Subject: Project [Project Name] – Revised Delivery Timeline** Dear [Client Name], I'm writing to inform you that the delivery of [Project Name] will be delayed by two weeks, with a revised completion date of [New Date] instead of [Original Date]. During integration testing this week, our team uncovered unexpected technical challenges related to [brief description, e.g., data synchronization between the legacy system and new platform]. These issues were not visible in earlier testing phases and only emerged when the full system components were connected. Rather than deliver a product that doesn't meet our quality standards—or yours—we made the decision to address these issues properly be…
17.3s944 output tokens

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Subject: Updated Project Timeline – Revised Delivery Date Dear [Client Name], I hope this message finds you well. I’m writing to provide an important update regarding the delivery timeline for [Project Name]. During our recent integration testing phase, we identified several unexpected technical challenges that require additional resolution to ensure the final deliverable meets the quality and performance standards we committed to. After carefully reviewing the scope of these items with our technical team, we have determined that the project delivery will need to be extended by two weeks. I sincerely apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. Please be assured that we are taking imm…
4.6s449 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Ember-1 or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
Per 1M output tokens, Ember-1 is ¥2,680.5 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is ¥1,055.5 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Ember-1 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B compare?
Ember-1 takes 1,048,576 tokens; Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B takes 1,048,576.
Can I use Ember-1 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "ember-1" or "qwen3.8-2.4t-a95b" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Ember-1 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Ember-1

More comparisons with Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B