Model comparison

Ember-1 vs Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

Ember-1 (Fireworks) and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct (Meta), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

Ember-1meta-llama logoLlama 3.1 8B Instruct
ProviderFireworksMeta
Input (per 1M tokens)¥536.1¥8.94
Output (per 1M tokens)¥2,680.5¥14.3
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥1,876¥16
Context window1,048,576 tokens131,072 tokens
Release date9/24/20267/23/2024
Input modalitiestext, imagetext
Throughput (p50)——
Arena · overallUnranked#329 · ELO 1,211
Arena · JapaneseUnranked#243 · ELO 1,087
Arena · codingUnranked#323 · ELO 1,260

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct: ¥14.3 per 1M output tokens, 99% less than Ember-1.
  • For long documents, Ember-1: a 1,048,576-token context window against 131,072 for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Ember-1

# Counting the 'r's in "strawberry" **Step 1: Write out the word letter by letter** s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y **Step 2: Examine each letter one at a time** | Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? | |----------|--------|------------| | 1 | s | No | | 2 | t | No | | 3 | r | ✅ Yes (1) | | 4 | a | No | | 5 | w | No | | 6 | b | No | | 7 | e | No | | 8 | r | ✅ Yes (2) | | 9 | r | ✅ Yes (3) | | 10 | y | No | **Step 3: Verify by splitting the word into parts** - "straw" → contains **1** r - "berry" → contains **2** r's - Total: 1 + 2 = **3** ## Answer The word "strawberry" contains **3** r's.
8.2s482 output tokens

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

To count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry', I will break down the word into its individual letters and examine each one. Here's the step-by-step process: 1. The word 'strawberry' consists of the following letters: s-t-r-a-w-b-e-r-r-y. 2. I will start by counting the letters that are not 'r'. The word has 1 's', 1 't', 1 'a', 1 'w', 1 'b', 1 'e', 1 'y'. 3. Next, I will count the number of 'r's. The word has 2 'r's, one of which is part of the letter combination 'rr'. Therefore, there are 2 'r's in the word 'strawberry'.
9.7s169 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Ember-1

## The Cause The error means `users` is `undefined` when the component renders, so calling `.map()` on it fails. The component itself is fine — the problem is that the `users` prop isn't being provided (or isn't ready yet). The most common reasons this happens: 1. **Async data hasn't loaded yet** — the parent fetches users from an API, and the component renders before the fetch completes: ```jsx const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // undefined initially! ``` 2. **The prop isn't passed or is misspelled** in the parent: ```jsx <UserList user={users} /> // typo: should be "users" ``` 3. **Wrong data shape** — e.g., passing the whole response object instead of `response…
18.2s960 output tokens

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

The error `TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')` typically occurs when you're trying to access a property (in this case, `map`) on an object that is `undefined`. In your case, the `users` prop passed to the `UserList` component is `undefined`. This is likely because the parent component that renders `UserList` is not passing the `users` prop, or the prop is not being properly initialized. To fix this error, you can add a simple check to ensure that `users` is not `undefined` before trying to call `map` on it: ```javascript function UserList({ users }) { if (!users) return null; // or return a default message, e.g. "No users found" return ( <ul> {us…
7.9s292 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Ember-1

# Code Review ## Bugs and correctness issues - **Bare `except:`** catches *everything* — including `KeyboardInterrupt` and, critically, `KeyError` from `item["active"]`. A malformed item in the response would be misinterpreted as a network failure, wasting all your retries on a data problem that retrying can't fix. - **Retrying all non-200 statuses** — a 404 or 401 will never succeed on retry. Only transient errors (connection failures, timeouts, 429, 5xx) are worth retrying. - **Wasted sleep on the final attempt** — the loop sleeps 2 seconds even after the last failure, before returning `[]`. - **Ambiguous return value** — `[]` means both "request failed" and "no active items." Callers ca…
95.0s5356 output tokens

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Here are some suggestions for improving the function's readability, performance, and best practices: **Readability Improvements** 1. **Function name**: Consider renaming `get_data` to `fetch_active_items` to better reflect its purpose. 2. **Variable naming**: Use more descriptive variable names, such as `response` instead of `r`, and `active_items` instead of `result`. 3. **Code organization**: Break up the function into smaller, more focused sections. This will improve readability and make it easier to understand the logic. 4. **Type hints**: Add type hints for function parameters and return types to make the code more self-documenting. **Performance Improvements** 1. **Use a more effic…
29.7s533 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Ember-1 or Llama 3.1 8B Instruct?
Per 1M output tokens, Ember-1 is ¥2,680.5 and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is ¥14.3 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Ember-1 and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct compare?
Ember-1 takes 1,048,576 tokens; Llama 3.1 8B Instruct takes 131,072.
Can I use Ember-1 and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "ember-1" or "llama-3.1-8b-instruct" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Ember-1 and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Ember-1

More comparisons with Llama 3.1 8B Instruct