Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs MiniMax M3

Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Anthropic) and MiniMax M3 (MiniMax), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

anthropic logoClaude Sonnet 4.6minimax logoMiniMax M3
ProviderAnthropicMiniMax
Input (per 1M tokens)¥554.4¥53.61
Output (per 1M tokens)¥2,772¥214.44
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥1,940¥161
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Release date2/17/20265/31/2026
Input modalitiestext, imagetext, image, video
Arena · overall#32 · ELO 1,472#78 · ELO 1,442
Arena · Japanese#41 · ELO 1,438#73 · ELO 1,402
Arena · coding#14 · ELO 1,528#64 · ELO 1,499

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, MiniMax M3: ¥214.44 per 1M output tokens, 92% less than Claude Sonnet 4.6.
  • On the Overall arena board, Claude Sonnet 4.6 ranks higher (#32; MiniMax M3 is #78).
  • On the Japanese arena board, Claude Sonnet 4.6 ranks higher (#41; MiniMax M3 is #73).
  • On the Coding arena board, Claude Sonnet 4.6 ranks higher (#14; MiniMax M3 is #64).
  • For long documents, MiniMax M3: a 1,048,576-token context window against 1,000,000 for Claude Sonnet 4.6.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

## Counting the letter 'r' in 'strawberry' Let me go through the word letter by letter: | Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? | |----------|--------|------------| | 1 | s | No | | 2 | t | No | | 3 | r | ✅ Yes | | 4 | a | No | | 5 | w | No | | 6 | b | No | | 7 | e | No | | 8 | r | ✅ Yes | | 9 | r | ✅ Yes | | 10 | y | No | ## Result There are **3 r's** in 'strawberry'.
2.2s181 output tokens

MiniMax M3

# Counting 'r's in "strawberry" Let me go through the word letter by letter: **s** - t - **r** - a - w - b - e - **r** - **r** - y | Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? | |----------|--------|------------| | 1 | s | No | | 2 | t | No | | 3 | **r** | ✓ (1st) | | 4 | a | No | | 5 | w | No | | 6 | b | No | | 7 | e | No | | 8 | **r** | ✓ (2nd) | | 9 | **r** | ✓ (3rd) | | 10 | y | No | ## Answer: **3** The word "strawberry" contains **three 'r's** — one at position 3, and two consecutive 'r's at positions 8 and 9.
25.6s455 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Claude Sonnet 4.6

## Problem Analysis The error occurs because `users` is `undefined` when the component renders. You're calling `.map()` on `undefined`, which throws a `TypeError`. **Common causes:** - The prop isn't passed by the parent component - Data is still loading asynchronously when the component first renders - The parent passes `undefined` or a misspelled prop name --- ## Solutions ### Option 1: Default Parameter Value (Simplest Fix) ```javascript function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` This assigns an empty array if `users` is `undefined`, so `.map()` always has an array to work with. --- ###…
9.4s798 output tokens

MiniMax M3

# Error Analysis The error `Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')` tells you that **`users` is `undefined`** when your component runs. JavaScript can't call `.map()` on `undefined`, so it throws this error. The component itself is fine syntactically — the problem is that the `users` prop isn't being passed, or hasn't loaded yet. ## Common Causes **1. The prop isn't passed at all:** ```jsx <UserList /> // No users prop → users is undefined ``` **2. Data is still loading (async fetch):** ```jsx const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // undefined initially ``` **3. API returns undefined:** ```jsx const { data } = await fetch('/api/users').then(r => r.json()); setUsers(data);…
32.8s710 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Claude Sonnet 4.6

## Code Review and Improvements ### Issues Identified 1. **Imports inside function** – should be at module level 2. **Bare `except`** – catches everything including `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit` 3. **`== True` comparison** – not Pythonic 4. **No logging/error visibility** – silent failures make debugging hard 5. **Magic numbers** – hardcoded `2`, `10` with no explanation 6. **No distinction between retriable/non-retriable errors** – e.g., 404 should not be retried 7. **Inefficient list building** – list comprehension is cleaner 8. **No exponential backoff** – fixed sleep is naive for real-world retry logic 9. **Missing type hints and docstring** --- ### Improved Version ```python im…
14.4s1099 output tokens

MiniMax M3

## Code Review This function works for the happy path, but it has several issues around error handling, retries, and readability. Here's a breakdown. ### 🐛 Bugs & Correctness Issues | # | Issue | Why It Matters | |---|-------|----------------| | 1 | `except:` with no exception type | Swallows `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, and *everything else* (typos, `MemoryError`). You lose visibility into real failures. | | 2 | Retries on every non‑200, including `4xx` | A `404` or `401` will never succeed by retrying — it just wastes time and rate-limit budget. | | 3 | `if item["active"] == True` | Both linters (PEP 8 E712) and Python idiom prefer `if item["active"]:`. | | 4 | `item["active"]` (…
33.4s3977 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or MiniMax M3?
Per 1M output tokens, Claude Sonnet 4.6 is ¥2,772 and MiniMax M3 is ¥214.44 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so MiniMax M3 is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Claude Sonnet 4.6 and MiniMax M3 compare?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 takes 1,000,000 tokens; MiniMax M3 takes 1,048,576.
Which ranks higher, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or MiniMax M3?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 ranks higher on the public arena (Claude Sonnet 4.6 #41, MiniMax M3 #73). Ranks move as the leaderboard updates.
Can I use Claude Sonnet 4.6 and MiniMax M3 with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "anthropic-claude-sonnet-4-6" or "minimax-m3" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Claude Sonnet 4.6 and MiniMax M3 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Claude Sonnet 4.6

More comparisons with MiniMax M3