Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Grok 4.7

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Anthropic) and Grok 4.7 (xAI), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

anthropic logoClaude Sonnet 4.6x-ai logoGrok 4.7
ProviderAnthropicxAI
Input (per 1M tokens)¥554.4¥276.2
Output (per 1M tokens)¥2,772¥828.6
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥1,940¥691
Context window1,000,000 tokens500,000 tokens
Release date2/17/20269/21/2026
Input modalitiestext, imagetext, image, file
Throughput (p50)
Arena · overall#37 · ELO 1,473Unranked
Arena · Japanese#43 · ELO 1,437Unranked
Arena · coding#16 · ELO 1,528Unranked

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, Grok 4.7: ¥828.6 per 1M output tokens, 70% less than Claude Sonnet 4.6.
  • For long documents, Claude Sonnet 4.6: a 1,000,000-token context window against 500,000 for Grok 4.7.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

## Counting the letter 'r' in 'strawberry' Let me go through the word letter by letter: | Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? | |----------|--------|------------| | 1 | s | No | | 2 | t | No | | 3 | r | ✅ Yes | | 4 | a | No | | 5 | w | No | | 6 | b | No | | 7 | e | No | | 8 | r | ✅ Yes | | 9 | r | ✅ Yes | | 10 | y | No | ## Result There are **3 r's** in 'strawberry'.
2.2s181 output tokens

Grok 4.7

The word "strawberry" consists of the letters S-T-R-A-W-B-E-R-R-Y. - The 3rd letter is R. - The 8th letter is R. - The 9th letter is R. This gives a total of 3 R's.
4.7s299 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Claude Sonnet 4.6

## Problem Analysis The error occurs because `users` is `undefined` when the component renders. You're calling `.map()` on `undefined`, which throws a `TypeError`. **Common causes:** - The prop isn't passed by the parent component - Data is still loading asynchronously when the component first renders - The parent passes `undefined` or a misspelled prop name --- ## Solutions ### Option 1: Default Parameter Value (Simplest Fix) ```javascript function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` This assigns an empty array if `users` is `undefined`, so `.map()` always has an array to work with. --- ###…
9.4s798 output tokens

Grok 4.7

The error happens because `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so calling `.map` on it fails. That usually means the parent rendered `<UserList />` (or `<UserList users={undefined} />`) before data was loaded, or the prop name doesn’t match. **Fix it in the component** so it tolerates a missing list: ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` Or guard the call: ```jsx function UserList({ users }) { return ( <ul> {(users ?? []).map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` **Also check the parent** so you pass an array once data exists: `…
12.8s393 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Claude Sonnet 4.6

## Code Review and Improvements ### Issues Identified 1. **Imports inside function** – should be at module level 2. **Bare `except`** – catches everything including `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit` 3. **`== True` comparison** – not Pythonic 4. **No logging/error visibility** – silent failures make debugging hard 5. **Magic numbers** – hardcoded `2`, `10` with no explanation 6. **No distinction between retriable/non-retriable errors** – e.g., 404 should not be retried 7. **Inefficient list building** – list comprehension is cleaner 8. **No exponential backoff** – fixed sleep is naive for real-world retry logic 9. **Missing type hints and docstring** --- ### Improved Version ```python im…
14.4s1099 output tokens

Grok 4.7

## Review The function works for the happy path, but it hides failures, retries the wrong errors, and is harder to read and debug than it needs to be. ### Issues 1. **Imports inside the function** — move them to module level unless you have a strong reason (circular imports, optional dependency). 2. **Bare `except`** — swallows `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, and programming bugs. Catch specific exceptions. 3. **Retries non-retryable failures** — 4xx (except maybe 429) will not succeed on retry. Network errors and 5xx are the usual candidates. 4. **Sleeps after the last attempt** — wastes up to 2 seconds before returning `[]`. 5. **Unused loop variable** and vague names (`r`, `i`). 6.…
22.3s1525 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Grok 4.7?
Per 1M output tokens, Claude Sonnet 4.6 is ¥2,772 and Grok 4.7 is ¥828.6 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so Grok 4.7 is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Grok 4.7 compare?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 takes 1,000,000 tokens; Grok 4.7 takes 500,000.
Can I use Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Grok 4.7 with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "anthropic-claude-sonnet-4-6" or "grok-4.7" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Grok 4.7 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Claude Sonnet 4.6

More comparisons with Grok 4.7