Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-6 Sol

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Anthropic) and GPT-6 Sol (OpenAI), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

anthropic logoClaude Sonnet 4.6openai logoGPT-6 Sol
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input (per 1M tokens)¥554.4¥357.4
Output (per 1M tokens)¥2,772¥1,787
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥1,940¥1,251
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,050,000 tokens
Release date2/17/20269/22/2026
Input modalitiestext, imagefile, image, text
Throughput (p50)
Arena · overall#37 · ELO 1,473Unranked
Arena · Japanese#43 · ELO 1,437Unranked
Arena · coding#16 · ELO 1,528Unranked

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, GPT-6 Sol: ¥1,787 per 1M output tokens, 36% less than Claude Sonnet 4.6.
  • For long documents, GPT-6 Sol: a 1,050,000-token context window against 1,000,000 for Claude Sonnet 4.6.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

## Counting the letter 'r' in 'strawberry' Let me go through the word letter by letter: | Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? | |----------|--------|------------| | 1 | s | No | | 2 | t | No | | 3 | r | ✅ Yes | | 4 | a | No | | 5 | w | No | | 6 | b | No | | 7 | e | No | | 8 | r | ✅ Yes | | 9 | r | ✅ Yes | | 10 | y | No | ## Result There are **3 r's** in 'strawberry'.
2.2s181 output tokens

GPT-6 Sol

“Strawberry” is spelled **s-t-r-a-w-b-e-r-r-y**. There’s one **r** near the beginning and two near the end, for a total of **3**.
2.7s76 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Claude Sonnet 4.6

## Problem Analysis The error occurs because `users` is `undefined` when the component renders. You're calling `.map()` on `undefined`, which throws a `TypeError`. **Common causes:** - The prop isn't passed by the parent component - Data is still loading asynchronously when the component first renders - The parent passes `undefined` or a misspelled prop name --- ## Solutions ### Option 1: Default Parameter Value (Simplest Fix) ```javascript function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` This assigns an empty array if `users` is `undefined`, so `.map()` always has an array to work with. --- ###…
9.4s798 output tokens

GPT-6 Sol

`users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so calling `users.map(...)` throws the error. The component needs an array, but its parent may not be passing `users`, or the data may not have loaded yet. You can default it to an empty array: ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` Also check the parent component to make sure it passes an array: ```jsx <UserList users={users} /> ``` If `users` comes from an API, initialize its state as `[]` or show a loading state until the data arrives.
2.2s161 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Claude Sonnet 4.6

## Code Review and Improvements ### Issues Identified 1. **Imports inside function** – should be at module level 2. **Bare `except`** – catches everything including `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit` 3. **`== True` comparison** – not Pythonic 4. **No logging/error visibility** – silent failures make debugging hard 5. **Magic numbers** – hardcoded `2`, `10` with no explanation 6. **No distinction between retriable/non-retriable errors** – e.g., 404 should not be retried 7. **Inefficient list building** – list comprehension is cleaner 8. **No exponential backoff** – fixed sleep is naive for real-world retry logic 9. **Missing type hints and docstring** --- ### Improved Version ```python im…
14.4s1099 output tokens

GPT-6 Sol

The main issues are the bare `except`, which hides errors such as malformed JSON, and retrying every non-200 response, including client errors that usually won’t improve with another attempt. The function also sleeps after its final attempt. ```python import time import requests def get_data(url, retries=3): if retries < 1: raise ValueError("retries must be at least 1") for attempt in range(retries): try: response = requests.get(url, timeout=10) except requests.RequestException: if attempt == retries - 1: raise else: # Retry rate limits and server errors, but not other client errors.…
10.3s814 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GPT-6 Sol?
Per 1M output tokens, Claude Sonnet 4.6 is ¥2,772 and GPT-6 Sol is ¥1,787 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so GPT-6 Sol is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT-6 Sol compare?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 takes 1,000,000 tokens; GPT-6 Sol takes 1,050,000.
Can I use Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT-6 Sol with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "anthropic-claude-sonnet-4-6" or "gpt-6-sol" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT-6 Sol from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Claude Sonnet 4.6

More comparisons with GPT-6 Sol