Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-6 Luna

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Anthropic) and GPT-6 Luna (OpenAI), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

anthropic logoClaude Sonnet 4.6openai logoGPT-6 Luna
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input (per 1M tokens)¥554.4¥17.87
Output (per 1M tokens)¥2,772¥89.35
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥1,940¥63
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,050,000 tokens
Release date2/17/20269/22/2026
Input modalitiestext, imagefile, image, text
Throughput (p50)
Arena · overall#37 · ELO 1,473Unranked
Arena · Japanese#43 · ELO 1,437Unranked
Arena · coding#16 · ELO 1,528Unranked

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, GPT-6 Luna: ¥89.35 per 1M output tokens, 97% less than Claude Sonnet 4.6.
  • For long documents, GPT-6 Luna: a 1,050,000-token context window against 1,000,000 for Claude Sonnet 4.6.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

## Counting the letter 'r' in 'strawberry' Let me go through the word letter by letter: | Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? | |----------|--------|------------| | 1 | s | No | | 2 | t | No | | 3 | r | ✅ Yes | | 4 | a | No | | 5 | w | No | | 6 | b | No | | 7 | e | No | | 8 | r | ✅ Yes | | 9 | r | ✅ Yes | | 10 | y | No | ## Result There are **3 r's** in 'strawberry'.
2.2s181 output tokens

GPT-6 Luna

In **“strawberry”**, the letter **r** appears at positions 3, 8, and 9. So there are **3** “r”s.
2.7s94 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Claude Sonnet 4.6

## Problem Analysis The error occurs because `users` is `undefined` when the component renders. You're calling `.map()` on `undefined`, which throws a `TypeError`. **Common causes:** - The prop isn't passed by the parent component - Data is still loading asynchronously when the component first renders - The parent passes `undefined` or a misspelled prop name --- ## Solutions ### Option 1: Default Parameter Value (Simplest Fix) ```javascript function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` This assigns an empty array if `users` is `undefined`, so `.map()` always has an array to work with. --- ###…
9.4s798 output tokens

GPT-6 Luna

`users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so calling `users.map(...)` throws. This often happens because the parent didn’t pass the prop or because data hasn’t loaded yet. If an empty list is acceptable until the data arrives, provide a default: ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => ( <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li> ))} </ul> ); } ``` Also check that the parent passes `users`: ```jsx <UserList users={users} /> ``` If `users` is loaded asynchronously, initialize it as an array: ```jsx const [users, setUsers] = useState([]); ``` If `null` is also possible, normalize it before mapping, for example `(users ?? […
3.8s289 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Claude Sonnet 4.6

## Code Review and Improvements ### Issues Identified 1. **Imports inside function** – should be at module level 2. **Bare `except`** – catches everything including `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit` 3. **`== True` comparison** – not Pythonic 4. **No logging/error visibility** – silent failures make debugging hard 5. **Magic numbers** – hardcoded `2`, `10` with no explanation 6. **No distinction between retriable/non-retriable errors** – e.g., 404 should not be retried 7. **Inefficient list building** – list comprehension is cleaner 8. **No exponential backoff** – fixed sleep is naive for real-world retry logic 9. **Missing type hints and docstring** --- ### Improved Version ```python im…
14.4s1099 output tokens

GPT-6 Luna

Key improvements: - Move imports to module scope. - Catch `requests.RequestException` instead of using a bare `except`; the current handler can hide programming errors as well as network failures. - Call `raise_for_status()` so unsuccessful HTTP responses are handled explicitly. - Use a list comprehension instead of building the result manually. - Replace `item["active"] == True` with `item.get("active") is True` if the field is expected to be the Boolean `True`. - Add backoff between attempts. A fixed two-second delay can make retries slower than necessary. - Decide whether failures should raise an exception or return `[]`. Returning `[]` makes a failed request indistinguishable from a suc…
16.5s1713 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GPT-6 Luna?
Per 1M output tokens, Claude Sonnet 4.6 is ¥2,772 and GPT-6 Luna is ¥89.35 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so GPT-6 Luna is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT-6 Luna compare?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 takes 1,000,000 tokens; GPT-6 Luna takes 1,050,000.
Can I use Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT-6 Luna with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "anthropic-claude-sonnet-4-6" or "gpt-6-luna" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT-6 Luna from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Claude Sonnet 4.6

More comparisons with GPT-6 Luna