Model comparison

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Inkling

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic) and Inkling (Thinking Machines), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

anthropic logoClaude Opus 5.5Inkling
ProviderAnthropicThinking Machines
Input (per 1M tokens)¥692.4¥178.7
Output (per 1M tokens)¥3,462¥723.74
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥2,423¥541
Context window1,000,000 tokens524,288 tokens
Release date9/22/20267/17/2026
Input modalitiestext, image, filetext, image, audio
Throughput (p50)
Arena · overallUnranked#85 · ELO 1,440
Arena · JapaneseUnranked#63 · ELO 1,415
Arena · codingUnranked#78 · ELO 1,492

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, Inkling: ¥723.74 per 1M output tokens, 79% less than Claude Opus 5.5.
  • For long documents, Claude Opus 5.5: a 1,000,000-token context window against 524,288 for Inkling.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Claude Opus 5.5

# Counting 'r's in "strawberry" **Step 1: Spell out the word letter by letter.** | Position | Letter | |----------|--------| | 1 | s | | 2 | t | | 3 | **r** ← | | 4 | a | | 5 | w | | 6 | b | | 7 | e | | 8 | **r** ← | | 9 | **r** ← | | 10 | y | **Step 2: Mark each 'r'.** - Position 3: the "r" in "st**r**aw" - Positions 8 and 9: the double "rr" in "be**rr**y" **Step 3: Add them up.** 1 (in "straw") + 2 (in "berry") = **3** **Answer: There are 3 'r's in "strawberry."** A common mistake is to count only 2, because the double "rr" in "berry" can be read as a single sound. Breaking the word into its parts, "straw" + "berry," makes all three easy to see.
5.4s376 output tokens

Inkling

Let's break down the word **"strawberry"** letter by letter: 1. **s** 2. **t** 3. **r** ← (1st 'r') 4. **a** 5. **w** 6. **b** 7. **e** 8. **r** ← (2nd 'r') 9. **r** ← (3rd 'r') 10. **y** So the spelling is: s-t-**r**-a-w-b-e-**r**-**r**-y Counting them up: - One 'r' in "str" (the 3rd letter) - Two 'r's in "berry" (the 8th and 9th letters) **Total: 3 'r's** in "strawberry".**
2.4s417 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Claude Opus 5.5

## What's causing it The error means `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so `users.map(...)` fails. The component itself is fine. The problem is the value it receives from its parent. Common reasons: 1. **Async data hasn't loaded yet.** This is the most common cause. The parent fetches users from an API, and on the first render the state is still `undefined`: ```jsx const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // undefined on first render useEffect(() => { fetch('/api/users').then(r => r.json()).then(setUsers); }, []); return <UserList users={users} />; // crashes before fetch completes ``` 2. **The prop isn't being passed**, or has a different name: ```js…
10.9s1040 output tokens

Inkling

The error occurs because `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so `users.map` fails. This usually happens when: - The parent doesn't pass the prop (`<UserList />` instead of `<UserList users={...} />`) - Data is still loading (e.g., API hasn't returned yet) ## Quick Fix Provide a default empty array so `.map` always has an array to work with: ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` Alternatively, guard against undefined explicitly: ```jsx function UserList({ users }) { if (!users) return null; // or a loading state return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={…
4.9s585 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Claude Opus 5.5

# Code Review: `get_data` The function works in the happy path, but it has several issues that can hide bugs, waste time, and make failures hard to diagnose. ## Issues ### 🔴 Correctness and Reliability **1. The bare `except:` is the most serious problem.** It catches everything, including `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, and bugs in your own code. For example, if an item is missing the `"name"` key, the resulting `KeyError` gets swallowed and the request is retried as if it were a network error. The same happens with invalid JSON. Catch only the exceptions you expect, such as `requests.ConnectionError` and `requests.Timeout`. **2. Failure is indistinguishable from "no results."** Ret…
33.5s4023 output tokens

Inkling

Here is a review with an improved version followed by explanations. ### Issues in the original - **Imports inside the function**: Re-importing on every call is inefficient. - **Bare `except:`**: Catches `SystemExit`, `KeyboardInterrupt`, etc. - **Silent failures**: No logging; errors disappear. - **Magic numbers**: `10`, `2`, `200` are hard-coded. - **Data validation missing**: Assumes `data` is a list and every item has `"active"`, `"name"`, and `"id"` (will crash with `KeyError`). - **Performance**: Uses `.append()` in a loop instead of a list comprehension. - **Ambiguous return**: `[]` means both "success with no results" and "total failure". ### Improved version ```python import loggi…
54.1s5649 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or Inkling?
Per 1M output tokens, Claude Opus 5.5 is ¥3,462 and Inkling is ¥723.74 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so Inkling is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Claude Opus 5.5 and Inkling compare?
Claude Opus 5.5 takes 1,000,000 tokens; Inkling takes 524,288.
Can I use Claude Opus 5.5 and Inkling with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "anthropic-claude-opus-5-5" or "inkling" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Claude Opus 5.5 and Inkling from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Claude Opus 5.5

More comparisons with Inkling