Model comparison

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro

Pricing, context window and real answers (October 2026)

Claude Opus 4.6 (Anthropic) and Kimi K3.1 Pro (Moonshot), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

anthropic logoClaude Opus 4.6moonshotai logoKimi K3.1 Pro
ProviderAnthropicMoonshot
Input (per 1M tokens)$5.42$2.11
Output (per 1M tokens)$26.77$10.55
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)$18.80$7.39
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Release date2/4/202610/23/2026
Input modalitiestext, imagetext, image, video
Throughput (p50)146 tokens/s (n=27)—
Arena · overall#8 · ELO 1,497Unranked
Arena · Japanese#17 · ELO 1,484Unranked
Arena · coding#5 · ELO 1,547Unranked

Prices are FastMetal's rates, before tax.

Rankings: LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), CC BY 4.0, snapshot 2026-10-22; category names mapped and ratings rounded by FastMetal.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, Kimi K3.1 Pro: $10.55 per 1M output tokens, 61% less than Claude Opus 4.6.
  • For long documents, Kimi K3.1 Pro: a 1,048,576-token context window against 1,000,000 for Claude Opus 4.6.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Claude Opus 4.6

I need to count the number of 'r's in the word 'strawberry'. Let me go through it letter by letter. **s** - not an r **t** - not an r **r** - this is an r ✓ (count: 1) **a** - not an r **w** - not an r **b** - not an r **e** - not an r **r** - this is an r ✓ (count: 2) **r** - this is an r ✓ (count: 3) **y** - not an r There are **3** r's in 'strawberry'.
3.2s158 output tokens

Kimi K3.1 Pro

There are **3** ‘r’s in **“strawberry.”** 1. Write out each letter: **s – t – r – a – w – b – e – r – r – y** 2. Locate the ‘r’s: positions **3, 8, and 9**. 3. Count them: **1 + 1 + 1 = 3**.
11.3s

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Claude Opus 4.6

# Understanding the Error The error `Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')` means that **`users` is `undefined`** when the component renders. You're trying to call `.map()` on a value that doesn't exist yet. This typically happens when: - The parent component doesn't pass the `users` prop - The data is being fetched asynchronously and hasn't loaded yet - The prop name is misspelled ## Solutions ### 1. Add a Default Parameter Value (Simplest Fix) ```javascript function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` ### 2. Add a Guard with Optional Chaining ```javascript function UserList({…
10.5s599 output tokens

Kimi K3.1 Pro

## What's causing the error The error means `users` is `undefined` when the component renders, and you can't call `.map()` on `undefined`. The component itself is fine — the problem is that whatever renders `<UserList />` either isn't passing the prop, or is passing a value that isn't an array yet. The most common cause is **async data fetching**: the parent renders `UserList` before the data has loaded. ```jsx function App() { const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // ❌ undefined on first render useEffect(() => { fetch('/api/users') .then(res => res.json()) .then(setUsers); }, []); return <UserList users={users} />; // users is undefined here initially } ``` On…
36.3s

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Claude Opus 4.6

# Code Review: `get_data` Function ## Original Issues Identified 1. **Imports inside function** – reduces clarity and adds per-call overhead 2. **Bare `except`** – catches everything including `KeyboardInterrupt` and `SystemExit` 3. **`== True` comparison** – non-Pythonic 4. **Manual list building** – could use a list comprehension 5. **No logging** – failures happen silently 6. **No response validation** – assumes JSON is always a list of dicts with specific keys 7. **Magic numbers** – `timeout=10`, `sleep(2)` unexplained 8. **Vague function/variable names** – `r`, `data`, `get_data` --- ## Improved Version ```python import logging import time from typing import Any import requests fr…
19.9s1223 output tokens

Kimi K3.1 Pro

The timeout and bounded retry loop are good starting points. The biggest issue is that failures—and even programming errors—are silently converted into retries and then `[]`. ### Suggested improvements - **Avoid bare `except:`**. It catches `KeyboardInterrupt`, `KeyError`, JSON/schema errors, and other bugs. Retry only expected transient network failures; let malformed responses fail visibly. - **Use a deliberate retry policy**. Retrying `401`, `403`, or `404` usually wastes time. Retry only transient statuses, use exponential backoff, and avoid sleeping after the final attempt. - **Do not use `[]` for both failure and no results**. Prefer raising the final exception so callers can disting…
560.2s

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or Kimi K3.1 Pro?
Per 1M output tokens, Claude Opus 4.6 is $26.77 and Kimi K3.1 Pro is $10.55 on FastMetal (US dollars, before tax), so Kimi K3.1 Pro is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Claude Opus 4.6 and Kimi K3.1 Pro compare?
Claude Opus 4.6 takes 1,000,000 tokens; Kimi K3.1 Pro takes 1,048,576.
Can I use Claude Opus 4.6 and Kimi K3.1 Pro with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "anthropic-claude-opus-4-6" or "kimi-k3.1-pro" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Claude Opus 4.6 and Kimi K3.1 Pro from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Claude Opus 4.6

More comparisons with Kimi K3.1 Pro