Model comparison

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs MiMo-V2.5

Pricing, context window and real answers (October 2026)

Claude Haiku 5.5 (Anthropic) and MiMo-V2.5 (Xiaomi), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

anthropic logoClaude Haiku 5.5MiMo-V2.5
ProviderAnthropicXiaomi
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.1055$0.1477
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.5275$0.2954
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)$0.3693$0.2954
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,050,000 tokens
Release date10/7/20264/22/2026
Input modalitiestext, image, filetext, audio, image, video
Throughput (p50)—77 tokens/s (n=24)
Arena · overallUnranked#107 · ELO 1,434
Arena · JapaneseUnranked#148 · ELO 1,320
Arena · codingUnranked#91 · ELO 1,491

Prices are FastMetal's rates, before tax.

Rankings: LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), CC BY 4.0, snapshot 2026-10-02; category names mapped and ratings rounded by FastMetal.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, MiMo-V2.5: $0.2954 per 1M output tokens, 44% less than Claude Haiku 5.5.
  • For long documents, MiMo-V2.5: a 1,050,000-token context window against 1,000,000 for Claude Haiku 5.5.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Claude Haiku 5.5

There are **3** r's in "strawberry." 1. **Spell out the word:** s, t, r, a, w, b, e, r, r, y 2. **Go through each letter and count the r's:** - Position 3: **r** (count = 1) - Position 8: **r** (count = 2) - Position 9: **r** (count = 3) 3. **Check the rest:** s, t, a, w, b, e, and y are not r's. Total: **3**
2.4s200 output tokens

MiMo-V2.5

# Counting the 'r's in 'strawberry' Let me spell the word out letter by letter: | Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? | |----------|--------|------------| | 1 | **s** | ❌ | | 2 | **t** | ❌ | | 3 | **r** | ✅ (1) | | 4 | **a** | ❌ | | 5 | **w** | ❌ | | 6 | **b** | ❌ | | 7 | **e** | ❌ | | 8 | **r** | ✅ (2) | | 9 | **r** | ✅ (3) | | 10 | **y** | ❌ | ## Answer: **3** 'r's The three r's are found at positions **3**, **8**, and **9** in the word.
14.9s313 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Claude Haiku 5.5

The error means `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so `.map` is called on nothing. The component destructures the `users` prop, but the parent didn't pass it, or passed `undefined`. ## Common causes **1. The parent doesn't pass the prop, or uses a different name** ```jsx <UserList /> // users is undefined <UserList user={users} /> // wrong name: "user" instead of "users" ``` **2. The data hasn't loaded yet (most common with fetched data)** ```jsx function App() { const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // undefined initially useEffect(() => { fetch('/api/users').then(r => r.json()).then(setUsers); }, []); return <UserList users={users} />;…
5.1s888 output tokens

MiMo-V2.5

This error occurs because your `users` prop is `undefined` when the component tries to call `.map()` on it. This usually happens when: 1. The parent component doesn't pass a `users` prop 2. The `users` data is still loading (asynchronous operation) 3. There's a typo in the prop name when passing from parent ## How to Fix It ### 1. Add Default Props or Prop Validation Add a default value for the `users` prop: ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } // Or with PropTypes import PropTypes from 'prop-types'; function UserList({ users }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key…
11.2s808 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Claude Haiku 5.5

## Issues **Correctness and robustness** 1. **Bare `except:`** catches everything, including `KeyboardInterrupt` and `SystemExit`, so Ctrl+C may not stop the program. Catch specific exceptions: `requests.RequestException` for network problems and `ValueError` for invalid JSON. 2. **Retries non-retryable errors.** A 404 or 401 won't succeed on retry, so retrying wastes time. Only retry transient failures such as 429, 5xx, timeouts, and connection errors. 3. **Sleeps after the final attempt.** The loop sleeps even when no retry follows. 4. **Fixed sleep with no backoff.** Exponential backoff is the standard approach for retries. 5. **Silent failure.** Every failure returns `[]` with no loggin…
18.1s4096 output tokens

MiMo-V2.5

# Code Review: `get_data` Function ## Issues Identified | Category | Issue | Severity | |----------|-------|----------| | Style | Imports inside function body | Medium | | Reliability | Bare `except` catches `KeyboardInterrupt`/`SystemExit` | High | | Reliability | Silent failures — no logging | Medium | | Readability | `== True` comparison (redundant) | Low | | Readability | No docstring or type hints | Medium | | Performance | Could use list comprehension | Low | | Robustness | No exponential backoff on retries | Medium | | Robustness | `r.json()` can fail silently under bare except | High | | Style | Uninformative variable names (`r`, `i`) | Low | | Config | Magic numbers hardcoded (`ti…
33.6s1854 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or MiMo-V2.5?
Per 1M output tokens, Claude Haiku 5.5 is $0.5275 and MiMo-V2.5 is $0.2954 on FastMetal (US dollars, before tax), so MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Claude Haiku 5.5 and MiMo-V2.5 compare?
Claude Haiku 5.5 takes 1,000,000 tokens; MiMo-V2.5 takes 1,050,000.
Can I use Claude Haiku 5.5 and MiMo-V2.5 with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "anthropic-claude-haiku-5-5" or "mimo-v2.5" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Claude Haiku 5.5 and MiMo-V2.5 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Claude Haiku 5.5

More comparisons with MiMo-V2.5